70°
forecast

Virginia governor taps analysts to study liquor options

Posted to: News State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

As he looks to salvage a plan to privatize state liquor operations, Gov. Bob McDonnell and his team are revisiting an approach that was discussed over the summer and hiring an outside consultant to analyze the state system.

The administration has engaged The PFM Group to "provide financial analysis regarding potential approaches" to the privatization of state Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control functions, a McDonnell spokeswoman said.

The contract with the consultant hadn't been signed as of Monday afternoon but work had commenced, according to officials who didn't disclose terms of the deal.

A report from the group is expected before the General Assembly convenes in January, when the governor will renew his call for removing Virginia from the business of directly selling distilled spirits.

McDonnell pitched the privatization idea as a gubernatorial candidate in 2009. This year, he highlighted it as a key item for review by his government reform commission as it focused on ways to streamline state operations.

An initial version of the proposal unveiled in September included plans to generate a onetime windfall of $450 million for transportation through the auction of 1,000 retail licenses, wholesale licenses and the sale of other state liquor assets.

That plan left the state about $20 million short of the annual proceeds generated under the current system, prompting an outcry from some Democratic lawmakers.

Those complaints intensified when the revenue shortfall more than doubled, to almost $47 million, in a plan modified to assuage some interest groups' concerns about the first blueprint.

Depriving the state of millions in a tight economy made that version of the plan an easy target for Democrats who already weren't favorably disposed to the idea.

Not long after, McDonnell scuttled plans to bring the General Assembly back to Richmond this year for a special legislative session to consider the liquor plan.

"We will privatize Virginia's ABC stores. The only question is one of timing," McDonnell said last month when he decided not to call a special session, adding that his administration will have ABC legislation ready "on the first day" of the upcoming regular session.

One idea that appears to be gaining support among stakeholders is a kind of partial privatization discussed over the summer but ultimately eschewed in favor of the plan unveiled in the fall.

Virginia would retain wholesale and distribution responsibilities under that format, and private retailers would sell distilled spirits on their shelves in exchange for a slice of the profits.

Some retailers were initially cool to that concept but have softened now that the process has slowed.

"There's a recognition of the political reality that something has to be different. And so this is clearly one of the options that should be explored," said Rob Shinn, a lobbyist representing large retailers that support privatization.

Some of those retailers would prefer flexibility in setting liquor prices, rather than have the state dictate them, if Virginia pursues that approach.

Other business interests are quietly monitoring current developments.

A spokeswoman for the Retail Alliance said the group remains concerned about access to a new distilled spirits marketplace for small merchants, while a spokesman for beer and wine distributors declined comment on the latest back-and-forth.

More forthcoming with his views is Senate Majority Leader Richard Saslaw, a Fairfax County Democrat, who deemed the current plan "even worse than the other one."

He remains convinced that privatizing liquor operations will lose money for the state and won't raise as much money for transportation as advertised.

On a separate track, the General Assembly's audit and oversight commission is completing a review of the McDonnell liquor plan. That report could be available by the end of the month.

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

gov. bob

will do the right thing for Virginia...we're in good hands!

I've said it before

It doesn't matter if the state loses money here. Government has no business being in business, much less monopolizing the entire market for a given product type. Liquor sales need to be privatized now!

Enforcement

Taking on a liquor license will enhance the risk to retailers in the event a careless, underaged employee sells liquor to a minor. How will they absorb that cost if it means that the store will be boycotted by one-stop shoppers until they get the license back?

Also, I wonder, who will make sure the dancing girls are prudently clad?

how much

How much is this 'Group' going to costs the taxpayers?

Give it up McDonnell, Virginia cannot afford to lose millions of revenue each year because of this stupid idea.

Consultants

"The details" were not revealed. Is he just buying the answers he wants? That's scary. Just how much of our tax money is going to PHM for this study so that McD can continue beating a dead horse?

Do We Really Need Another Study?

I’m all in favor of private vs. government ownership when possible but do we really need a study to tell us that the state would make more money keeping all the profits instead of just taking part of them through taxation?

Smoke and Mirrors?

Why are we still discussing this issue? Half a billion dollars is a drop in the bucket regarding what we need for our transportation issues. VDOT found more than that "in a drawer" and we see how it's changed our transportation situation. Where does the GOP believe the budget cuts to deal with the revenue shortfall will come from? Where will the revenue to beef up enforcement come from? How much are we paying this consultant to come out with a study of predetermined conclusions? Kind of like the Governor's recent committee on the same issue? Lets move on to really important issues.

Peter Principal in action

This represents the triumph of idelogly over good sense. With all the pressing issues facing this Commonwealth, the biggest of which is the cowardice of the House of Delegates to deal with one of the prime functions of government, that is, transportation, to waste another dime and more time on an issue about which few Virginians really care, since it works the way it is, reveals that Governor McDonnell has been promoted to his level of incompetence. That is, he has lost this issue, put it behind you, move on to other more important issues.

It is never good sense for

It is never good sense for government to confiscate business which rightfully belongs in the private sector, producing for and supporting private citizens. This practice is so commonplace now, across so many industries and businesses. Returning this potential to the people, if it is ever to occur, will be fought every step of the way by arguments such as yours.

Prove my point

Like I said, the triumph of ideology over common sense. Keep proving my point.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners