The Virginian-Pilot
©
Urban planners and promoters of light rail often cite the 52-mile MAX light-rail system in Portland, Ore., for generating several billion dollars of real estate development around its stations since it began operating in 1986.
In Charlotte, N.C., where the 9.6-mile Lynx light-rail system opened in 2007, development has been more restrained, though that may be a reflection of the economy.
Developers aren’t clamoring to propose new projects, given the abundance of homes, condominiums and apartments on the market; low demand for any commercial space; and difficulty in obtaining financing.
Still, the economy hasn’t stopped local politicians, planners and economic development officials from pinning hopes for new development and economic renewal on Hampton Roads Transit’s 7.4-mile Tide “starter” light-rail line in Norfolk, scheduled to open in the spring.
“During this lull in the economy, it’s now probably the best time to put in the infrastructure for the type of development we’d like to see in the future,” said Warren Harris, Virginia Beach’s economic development director.
About 100 government officials and business people gathered in Norfolk recently for a forum hosted by the local chapter of the Urban Land Institute to discuss strategies for promoting development projects that maximize use of the nascent light-rail system.
Norfolk officials long have touted the benefits of “transit-oriented” developments. They cite recent projects such as the Wells Fargo Center office building in downtown Norfolk, the nearby Belmont at Freemason apartment building and other projects as examples of how developers can take advantage of the city’s 11 light-rail stations.
Recently, Virginia Beach officials have jumped on board, identifying eight sections of the city to be redeveloped with an emphasis on high-density, compact structures. Six of its “strategic growth areas” are along the old freight rail line that some city officials are pushing to use to extend the Tide light-rail system to near the Oceanfront.
The Tide initially will run from the regional medical center at Colley and Brambleton avenues in Norfolk, through downtown, past Harbor Park and parallel to Interstate 264 out to Newtown Road. An extension into Virginia Beach would be a straight shot from there along the same right of way.
Beach economic development officials hope the identified areas will give them a jump-start on pushing developers toward high-density projects that take advantage of light rail in the event it’s extended to the city.
“The decision has been for our future development to cluster in these strategic growth areas,” Harris said. “For us it means moving into an urban development pattern, where we’ll see more vertical development, more structured parking.”
Planning officials already have created master plans for areas at current light-rail stops, such as the transportation hub planned for the area around Harbor Park. Those master plans, the officials say, will provide a road map to allow them to maximize the integration of commercial and residential buildings with light-rail stations.
The Newtown Road area of Virginia Beach is poised to take advantage of light-rail development, even if an extension into the city is years away, Harris said.
The Tide’s eastern terminus is at the border of the two cities.
“Everyone agrees that it is still today probably the best location in all of Hampton Roads for development,” Harris said. “It’s close to Virginia Beach, close to Norfolk, close to interstates.”
For some developers, light rail itself can be a lure, said Chuck Rigney, an assistant director in Norfolk’s development department.
“Regions with light-rail systems are much more likely to attract the company-headquarters-type opportunities like what we’re trying to attract in Hampton Roads,” he said.
Plans for a light-rail station near York Street in Norfolk were key to Kotarides Developers’ decision to build the Belmont at Freemason apartment complex at the corner of York and Duke streets, said Pete A. Kotarides, a partner in the Virginia Beach-based firm.
“The parcel was really narrow. It wasn’t an easy site to work with,” Kotarides said. “Because light rail was there, it was worth the effort. If it was just some random site, we probably would have been a lot less interested. Having light rail there moved that location to the top of the list.”
For other developers, however, it might take a little convincing to build on tighter parcels and in denser buildings, said Debra Campbell, the planning director for Charlotte.
“I don’t want to say, 'Build it and they will come,’ ” said Campbell, speaking at the Urban Land Institute forum two weeks ago. “I will say, ' Build it, court, and if your courtship is good, they will come.’ ”
Charlotte has had success, Campbell said, in attracting several residential developments near light-rail stations. However, the city has had a tougher time luring office projects to those areas, she said.
The question of whether to build near light rail hinges on more than the line itself, said Michael Barrett, CEO of Virginia Beach-based developer Runnymede Corp.
“Just because you have a light-rail line coming within a half-mile of your property doesn’t mean you can throw up any multi-use building and it’ll be a success,” Barrett said. “No one factor ever determines whether a real estate project will be a success, but having access to light rail and roads increases the chances of success.”
Economic development officials have other arguments for trying to lure transit-oriented developments, he suggested.
“There is a good reason that the old suburban model doesn’t work,” Barrett said. “On one hand, we’ve seen the suburban 'McMansions’ fall in popularity. The market for those has fallen apart. The second issue is that younger people increasingly seem to prefer closer urban neighborhoods.”
Harris, Virginia Beach’s development director, doesn’t expect all developers in Hampton Roads to catch on right away.
“I think it’s been more of an education process to bring about a shift in a developer mindset,” he said. “There’s still a mentality around for more of a suburban development scheme rather than an urban scheme.”
Harris said successful high-density developments like Town Center in Virginia Beach help economic officials make the argument to developers.
“We can point to that as such a positive thing for those involved,” he said. “Although it may cost more, it’s greater density. So you’re going to get more product on the same piece of property.”
Josh Brown, (757) 446-2318, josh.brown@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
urban planner NOT
Yes , we critics have never been anywhere...Although this critic has. And besides living in virginia beach am currently working in Europe and our company works with transportation officals here in Europe. Need I say more.
Its the uninformed that dont get it light rail works
Amazing the neighsayers on Light Rail, I bet never have traveled beyond Hampton Roads. Their big trip is to richmond. Light Rail works in so many cases. I suggest any of the neysayers save the little coins and travel to portland. Its an amazing integrated system. ALl connected; and the side benefits are great, healthy communities, great integrated neighborhoods. LIght Rail has been successful in Charlotte, Houston, Denver, Salt Lake City (where they are already over capacity).Another, point, if any of you realize a tenet in urban planning that our planning schools teach is that it is imperative that investment in public infrastructure is key to bringing in private development. This is good practice.
Nice Assumption
But many people like myself have lived outside Hampton Roads. In places such as Northern VA, D.C., Maryland, and New York. Once again we hear wonderful praise about about Portland's rail system but looking at the numbers behind that wonderful magic train shows plenty. The operating revenues for 2009 were $123,ooo while operating expenses were $492,ooo for a loss of $369,ooo. 2010 was even better, operating expenses weighed in at $545,ooo with operating revenues a mere $130,ooo a difference of -$415,ooo. The truth is these systems sound great but come with heavy price tags. We continue to hear what ifs and could be but the numbers in pure form don't lie. You can spin it anyway you want but these systems are money pits and financial burdens.
Transit Oriented Development
I love when folks throw numbers around.If TOD was 10 times the investment we should have the greatest bus service to all points of Hampton Raods years ago. Fact is the results seem to never achieve the hype to get light rail through the process. Yes we do need mass transit for all the logical reasons. But the Norfolk /Virginiabeach light rail project is not an answer. Not even a good start. If we are REALLY trying to fix mass transit it would be easy to commit to a very high end well run bus system over the entire region very quickly( 12 months)with good service that reached everyone. I used to live on Shore Drive I could not even take the bus to the airport. After a 500 million Norfolk va beach light roil project I Still cant get to the airport.
Not the case
Actually no, that is not what the speakers at the ULI conference said. Busses are about transit, but they do not engender the investment by private developers because the routes can change on a whim. Only light rail and passenger rail have the land use and development potential to change and increase the value of new development. This has been the case in Denver, Dallas, San Jose, Charlotte, Dallas, and a host of others who have used light rail to stimulate economic development in their cities. A recent presentation by Stewart Schwartz to Envision Hampton Roads made the same case for the Northern Virginia area. Those cities that aspire to attract bright, young, urban professionals put rail/light rail and urban town settings in the mix.
Not About Public Transportation
Anyone who thinks light rail is about public transportation is kidding themselves. It is about public money being funneled into development projects at taxpayer expense. Of course under the umbrella of mass transit, global warming, economic development or any number of other templates. It is a way to funnel federal and local tax dollars into a project that a select few of our elected leaders have decided that they can push through even over the will of the local taxpayers with very dubious cost benefit numbers.Of course there are prize tokens to be had along the way as well. Just think of all the bio diesel or gas powered busses that could have beeen bought and run everywhere at the price of a short limited light rail line.
Correct
Actually yes, I agree that light rail is not really just about public transit; it is about values, and about land use, and about economic development. That is exactly what the presenter from Charlotte said. Of course, it does increase mobility and choices about lifestyle and how to get around an area. Of course, you imply that only light rail is subsidized, yet the costs to extend roads and interstates to far flung suburban locations is the classic example of subsidies changing land use patterns. Now, states around the nation are simply admitting that suburban development is not sustainable; McMansions on three acres on the fringe of the metropolitan area simply cost too much in public services. I agree; so does the market.
I agree that light rail is
I agree that light rail is not really just about public transit; it is about values. Uh, yea, let's talk about values Mike. In all of your newest developments, how many units (by percentage) have been targeted towards lower income people/section-8 residents?
and about land use Uh, yea, let's talk about land use-the rightful owners use of the land or, how YOU would do so much better with it if you could just find some means to take it from the owners hands and put it into yours?
and about economic development And THAT is the only reason you're interested in it-because in order to have economic development, you need a DEVELOPER like YOU!
It IS about choices Mike, so let's put it to a vote.
Or is you skeered?
Softball
Thanks for the softball. The chairman of Light Rail Now is an affordable housing advocate; why, because he sees the opportunity. Existing property owners within 1/2 mile radius will have the most opportunity to redevelop their property. But that is up to them based on their personal attitude toward enhancing the value of their property. Lastly, yes, light rail has an economic development component, and the resultant transit oriented development generally exceeds ten times the cost of the project. If the project costs $500 M, then the value of TOD over time exceeds $5 B. That is the increase in the commercial tax base, and one of the prime reasons cities pursue light rail in congested corridors and cxitizens support it.
again
How many of those developed properties are empty? Building something is one thing but filling them with tenants is another. Whose pocket is all that development going into? Again, the developers! Did the tax payer get a reduction of tax rates because of those amazing figures of development? No, not at all! If anything it was an excuse to raise property values near the line which again increases my taxes and as history shows a reduction in tax is rare. So now I have the tax increase for the light rail and then tax increase on property values. Either way, the tax payer foots the bill with the return to them being no where near their investment.
I wonder what the people in Charlotte think about the light rail verses what it costs them?