The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
Gov. Bob McDonnell's proposal to privatize liquor sales could yield less money for the state than expected due to overly optimistic assumptions, a new analysis by the General Assembly's auditing unit finds.
The report by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission indicates the McDonnell administration may have overestimated how much could be raised through the sale of wholesale and retail licenses and the liquidation of real estate held by the state Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
While the JLARC review raises questions about the financial model on which the privatization plan is based, it could end up as an academic exercise. Already facing significant opposition, the governor recently hired an outside consultant to evaluate ways to end Virginia's liquor monopoly, so his plan may change before he takes it to the General Assembly in January.
Tucker Martin, a spokesman for McDonnell, said that while the JLARC review "is based on one plan, the administration is considering multiple privatization models and proposals."
During his 2009 campaign, McDonnell called for ending Virginia's role in liquor sales. He designated it a key review item for his government reform commission, and his administration developed the plan this year. Plans to take up privatization at a special session of the General Assembly were shelved when it became apparent that support for the concept remained soft, particularly among Senate Democratic leaders who vowed to defeat it.
The current proposal calls for the auction of 1,000 retail licenses and the sale of wholesale licenses and various state liquor assets. Together, those sales are expected to generate a one-time windfall of about $450 million for the state. That money would be deposited into an account to help fund road projects.
In its most recent form, the plan leaves the state about $47 million short of the annual proceeds generated under the current system.
The JLARC report says the administration's revenue assumptions may be too low in some cases.
However, the report devotes more attention to factors that could keep the state from meeting its revenue projections, including a failure to sell all retail licenses, the purchase of licenses for less than anticipated, and the effects of financing costs on smaller retailers' license bids.
Wholesale license sales could fall far short of the $161 million McDonnell expects them to generate, the report says, pegging the figure at closer to $76 million.
Other factors that could alter the economics of the plan are the accuracy of the administration's markup calculations and the impact of wholesale and retail price markups on the market.
The report concludes that price increases could harm sales and that the plan "may overstate" the growth in liquor sales Virginia could experience under a privatized system if consumers buy here instead of in Maryland or Washington.
State Sen. Edward Houck, D-Spotsylvania, requested the report.
Democrats have argued that the plan will deprive the state of millions it receives under the current system and will lead to an explosion of stores beyond the 332 Virginia now operates. The release of the JLARC study seemed to stoke that criticism.
"This study confirms what we already knew - the governor's plan to privatize ABC won't generate the revenue we need to fix our crumbling transportation system," House Minority Leader Ward Armstrong, D-Henry, said in a statement. "After nearly a year of trying to salvage this bad idea, it's time for Bob McDonnell to stop wasting time and taxpayer money and put together a real strategy to grow our economy, improve education and bring our infrastructure into the 21st Century."
Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Let's think this through people
Monopolies are illegal.
Virginia has a monopoly on liquor.
Get it now?
Hmmm. A state commission..
composed of state government employees, issues a report that the government represents the best deal for the state! Gee, I'm stunned. I'm sure this will be fodder for yet another one sided editorial from the Pilot harping the benefits of state monopoly for the enlargement of the state's coffers. This, mind you, after lecturing us that 'riverboat gambling' should be rejected regardless of how much revenue that might generate! Hypocrisy, anyone?
You can bet Gov Mc D's....
got a hand in shooting down the allowing of the Devil's gambling games on the river. Why else do you think they want out of the business of selling the Devil's drink?
Uncle Pat has little McD wrapped around his finger. Kind of creepy like the high ups in the Catholic Church and the Pope debating about whether condoms should be promoted to prevent AIDS instead of doing what is scientifically and financially sound...
Like use a condom to help prevent the spread of aids and keep control over a money making industry that (irrespective of individual opinion over whether it is moral or immoral)is here to stay and should at least benefit the people in some way if only in generating revenue.
There is a reason the founding fathers wanted freedom of religion but seperation of church and state.
I haven't heard..
what the Governor's position is on gambling. However, the Pilot's editorial board, which certainly isn't a friend to conservative or Republican views, doesn't want gambling either, as recent editorials from them attest to. The editorial board doesn't appear to have a problem with the state Lottery, and they absolutely adore the state's monopoly on that "Devils'd drink" as you put it, but the chance that 'investors' as they put it might actually make a profit from the risks and investments they make just can't be allowed!
Time for a Transportation Plan
I don't think anyone ever really believed McDonnell's sale of liquor stores was more than fairy dust. We see one financial gimmick after the other with this crowd that opposes taxes while promising the world on everything else. If they are against tax increases, they need to man-up and also say they will do nothing to build roads, repair bridges, or fund transit.
government monopoly + communism
I can't believe anyone in the U.S. would want to keep this as is. I goes against the very fabric of what this country was built on. Less government involvement in the lives of the people. This is no different than communism plain and simple. The state should never have been in this business or any business for that matter. If you agree with how the ABC is currently organized you by default are supporting a communist organization. Government should not run/own/operate a business at all.
How long has Virginia regulated the sale of alcohol?
Oh,only about 75 years and strangely we haven't become a Communist State yet.Fearmongering is item one on page one of the corporate public relations play book to manipulate public opinion.
Corporations spend millions to PR groups to research public reation to certain phrases and develop slogans such as "Government take over of Health Care". Then they dissiminate these slogans and manipulated facts and figures to the media, politicians and other mediums to illicit knee jerk reactions from the uneducated who have never learned to critically think for themselves.
Universal health care if far cheaper and far more effective than privately managed (rationed) health care and the rest of the industrialized world has it and doesn't want to lose it. But the Corporate Spin Machine has convinced uneducated Americans that it is bad
and they rely on the ineffectiveness of short handed news media to do the ivestigative work to reveal the facts.
Seeing how the government is doing..
such a fine job, in your opinion, handling all aspects of liquor sales here, why stop at that? Why shouldn't the state government be handling all sales of food? There's big money in that! How about clothes? We all need them. Have you been able to get thru life without the government handling those and any other items for you? There is an apparatus in place that already handles the sale of wine and beer. Why can't they handle liquor as well? A purchaser has to be 21 regardless of what they buy, and where. Why is the state government the ONLY entity that capable of dealing with that!
BEWARE!!!
If you want to see how privatized liquore sales works, look at Prince Georges County, Maryland. As part of a federal probe, the county executive (similar to city manager) his wife, three cops and several liquor store owners were recently arrested on corruption and bribery charges related to liquor stores in that county. McDonnel needs to leave well enough alone. His plan will cost us in more ways than one.
Alcohol is for losers
Booze is for losers, keep it under state control. Don't let Pat Robertson McDonnell take Virginia back to the stone age.