The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
Republican Scott Rigell's first public act after winning Tuesday's 2nd District election was to attack what he calls "a culture of privilege" that afflicts members of Congress to the detriment of taxpayers.
Rigell rolled out a 10-point proposal for scaling back congressional perks and privileges and vowed to adhere to it himself regardless of whether it becomes law.
Rigell acknowledged his proposals won't make steep cuts in federal spending but argue d they would signal to the public that lawmakers want to set a good example.
Congress has developed "a culture of privilege, a culture of unaccountability," he said. "This is true of both parties."
His plan calls for,
- Cutting congressional office budgets to 2008 levels, limiting government-sponsored direct mail to two pieces a year, and banning government-funded robo- calls.
- Replacing lawmakers' pensions with a matching fund account similar to a 401(k) plan.
- Serving a maximum of 12 years in Congress and pushing for a constitutional change to make the term limit mandatory.
- Banning all congressional travel paid for by lobbyists or foundations and limiting trips to "real official business."
- Publishing all congressional committee votes online.
- Banning members of Congress and their staff members from lobbying or working for a lobbyist for five years after they leave government.
- Requiring all legislation to cite its constitutional basis.
- Prohibiting the introduction by legislators of so-called earmarks - specific spending allocations - unless they are related to defense or national security.
- Voting "present" on any bills introduced to honor sports teams or similar groups until a balanced federal budget is approved.
- Naming future federal buildings only after individuals who have died in defense of the United States.
Early this year, Rigell, a car dealer and a first-time candidate, had been working with a handful of other GOP congressional candidates on a similar list of proposals. He had hoped to announce the plan last spring. But that effort was halted, his campaign said, after the plan was stolen by two GOP primary opponents.
In March, Rigell accused Ben Loyola and Scott Taylor of stealing and passing off as their own the multi part plan. They released their competing "Contract on Congress" - which in some cases was almost identical to the plan Rigell had been working for months - just before Rigell was to unveil his proposals.
At the time, Rigell's campaign staff provided The Virginian-Pilot with copies of e-mails and other documents showing how they developed the plan, nicknamed "The Big Idea." GOP congressional candidates in Indiana and Washington state confirmed they were involved.
Loyola and Taylor denied the accusation but in separate interviews could not offer details of how they developed their own plan or when they decided to make it public. Rigell defeated the two, as well as three other candidates in the June Republican primary.
In the months after the controversy, the three men set aside their differences. Loyola and Taylor were in the Westin Virginia Beach Town Center ballroom Tuesday night when Rigell celebrated his election win over U.S. Rep. Glenn Nye, a Democrat. Rigell thanked them for supporting his general election campaign.
Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Rigells First Vote
As his first official vote he sides with the.opposite of what he says. He voted that members of congress do not have to reveal whether they take the healthcare plan offered to congress. Reform the way things are done in government? I think not. It will be more of the same. Wonder what the real agenda is.
What is the constitutional
What is the constitutional basis for limiting lobbying by former members of Congress? To me, that goes against the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Overall, these are misguided at best, but hey, they'll resonate with people who don't understand the legislative process and think that we need more "regular folks" in Congress.
Do any of you remember when
Do any of you remember when or how you became interested in politics? Most of you had a personal issue that made you ask why. Other professional and a multitude of others. But wasn't it really a desire to see the right thing was done? I am guilty of despising car dealers, and not to any fault of my own, just my own experience. But if you look at his proposals, they are honorable and well intentioned. There is nothing here that is partisan. He appears at this time to be truly concerned. Can't we lay down our flags and stand behind these types of suggestions?
Jobs First: JFCOM and Two Aircraft Carrier= 33,000 Jobs
How about you worry about saving the 33,000 jobs that we will lose when JFCOM closes, the USS Enterprise is retired and a second carrier is moved to Florida from Norfolk.
That stuff on Rigell's list doesn't amount to a hill of beans. 33,000 jobs are at risk so how about getting to work...
JFCOM & TWO Aircraft Carriers JOBS FIRST
How about you worry about saving the 33,000 jobs that we will lose when JFCOM closes, the USS Enterprise is retired and a second carrier is moved to Florida from Norfolk.
That stuff on Rigell's list doesn't amount to a hill of beans. 33,000 jobs are at risk so how about getting to work...
Rigell is a businessman and
Rigell is a businessman and not a politician. He will find out the hard way when he gets to Washington that he can't do all the things he promises to do, and he found a way to sucker the people to vote for him.
Start with ending the wars.
Then how about stopping the presidential campaigning (regardless of party) for members of congress up for re-election? The millions of dollars it costs for Air Force One and a backup Air Force One, logistics, security, and the military for him to fly all over the country and overseas is unreasonable and it is still paid for by the taxpayer. It costs a small fortune for him just to go across town. No one begrudges the president a vacation or his security, but his job is at The White House. With secure communications, and video conferencing, there is no reason for him to travel that much.
Sorry Scott, but you don't have a prayer of getting any of those proposals passed. Your first term will be learning who not to aggrevate.
NIMBY perks for Virginia
Congratulations, Congressman-elect. My first note to you is to question why earmarks are bad, unless they are for your district? Your statement that defense is off the table is an example of that, isn't it. We are so wedded to the defense establishment here in Hampton Roads and in all Virginia that we must keep defense from being cut. Talk about "fat." Have you read yet that the Defense Department of all government departments is the only one not audited in the last ten years? You know the reason. Let's begin with it for saving and not cut livesaving programs like Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. Defense spending has nothing to do with security; we are already 10 times more armed than any other country on earth.
Strike one
In all due respect, your first initiative after election ought to reveal that you get it; that is, you will address the absolutely most important priorties of the electorate. Frankly, that is jobs, jobs, and jobs; just like you ran, Scott. So please, stop with the process changes that are simply eye candy, and get with our priorities. What will you advocate to create jobs as you cut expenditures? What policies will you advocate to reduce the deficit? What will you cut? How can you cut significant money if DoD is off the table? Strike one, Scott.
Grandstanding
Do you really think that a freshman representative is going to get this done? None of the 1994 "Contract on America" made through the House and the Speaker (Newt) was the one who sold it to the voters. It's political grandstanding.
Robocalls - if the system is in place already, its cheap to maintain. Annoying but cheap.
Five year limit on lobbying? For the state department it's only 2.
Do political think tanks count too?
Question to Scott: Do you support Palin for President?