70°
forecast

San Antonio crew faced obstacles, former leader testifies

Posted to: Military

NORFOLK

The first commander to take the first-in-its-class San Antonio on deployment testified Tuesday about the ship's shortfalls at the court-martial of his former executive officer.

At issue is the role Lt. Cmdr. Sean Kearns played in the small-boat mishap that resulted in the death of a crew member in February 2009. The vessel flipped over and Petty Officer 1st Class Theophilus Ansong was lost at sea.

Capt. Kurt Kastner had turned over command of the amphibious transport dock ship to Cmdr. Eric Cash about six weeks before.

Kearns served both Kastner and Cash as executive officer, or XO, the second-most-senior officer aboard.

Kastner told the six jurors that his 367-person crew conducted small-boat operations - lowering rigid-hull inflatable boats over the side of the ship to the water below - throughout the first four months of the deployment to the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden.

Although the 11-meter RHIB had experienced engine troubles throughout the deployment, Kastner said he had faith in an experienced deck crew.

"I absolutely had a deep bench in the deck department," Kastner said in response to a question from Kearns' defense attorney. "Deeper than any amphib I've ever been on."

That didn't mean Kastner was satisfied with conditions on the San Antonio, a new platform that experienced setbacks even before the Navy took possession of it.

Asked about training and readiness in the months before the deployment began in August 2008, Kastner said the ship lacked requisite training manuals and others weren't applicable because the San Antonio was too new.

The electronic curriculum that was loaded onto a few of the ship's computers was largely irrelevant, he said: It had been developed for the ship as it was designed years earlier - not as it had actually been built.

Despite those limitations, Kastner had high praise for his crew, in general, and Kearns in particular.

"Sean backed up every decision I made, whether it was right or wrong, and if it was really wrong, he stepped up and told me," he said.

"I would certainly put him as the best XO in the Iwo Jima strike group, and probably the best on the Norfolk waterfront. I ride a lot of ships, every ship on the East Coast, from Mayport to Maine," said Kastner, who now works as a senior engineering assessor for the Navy's Atlantic fleet.

Kastner testified that he did not require Kearns to be present during small-boat operations. That testimony contradicts the prosecution's contention during opening arguments Monday that Kearns should have been on the ship's bridge as the small boat was being lowered into the Gulf of Aden.

His defense attorneys are attempting to show that Kearns can't be guilty of negligence in training and supervising small-boat operations because there were no set guidelines for the San Antonio-class ships.

If convicted, Kearns faces a maximum punishment of three months confinement and forfeiture of pay.

Kearns could have opted for administrative punishment, but accepting a reprimand - as Cmdr. Cash did this spring - would have effectively ended his career. He chose to go to trial instead. It is expected to last all week.

Kate Wiltrout, (757) 446-2629, kate.wiltrout@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

It's the Navy Way

Having been around the Navy since 1954 I have come to realize that they never will try to change for the better. It's simply put someone to blame and lay the incident to rest. We are all aware of the shortcomings of the LPD-17 and no amount of blame placed upon any person is going to make her issues go away. Having seen the former CO and XO in action during perhaps the ships darkest time I pray for the charges against Mr. Kearns to be dropped with no action taken. If they are not it will be a dark day for the Navy and all she stands for.

Who should Pay

I think the ship builder should pay for everything that was not done right. If I were to go out and work on someones house, I would have to pay for anything that I may have done wrong. Why don't the ship builders pay for what they did wrong. We the tax payers paid for it once already.

Construction by Avondale was subpar

and then she was moved to Ingalls. So, yes there are/were construction issues with this ship. However all of that was compounded by Hurricane Katrina. Due to various reasons, Ingalls did not take the ship out to sea prior to Katrina. And, yes, this was a decision by Ingalls and not the Navy because Ingalls had not yet given the keys to the Navy. Therefore, this ship was pierside when the 20 foot (or greater) storm surge roared through Ingalls.

If you listen to rumors:

The rumor mill has this class of ship having so many shortcomings in design and construction that it is a wonder it floats. These ships come back in to Norfolk, even brand new, and spend more time at Moon or BAE (the old NorShipCo.) being repaired than they seem to spend at the Navy piers.

What were the incidents?

Shots were fired from the deck of the amphibious transport dock ship San Antonio one of four incidents that caught the attention of the Navy.

Where can I read the rest of the story?

The same either way

I'm also glad, as some have posted, he's not just taking one for the team.

The sad thing, is even if he wins (which I hope he will), his career will be impacted. He'll always be labeled as "The guy who beat the rap".

Here's hoping for a not guilty!

I wonder why the witch hunt?

I wonder why the witch hunt? Even on a ship with proper instruction manuals affixing blame to the XO is pretty far flung unless it can be shown that he required the operations outside of safe practices.

HIGHER UPS ARE TICKED OFF

because LCDR Kearns rejected the offer of NJP. Those would likely include Fleet Forces and PHIBRON FOUR. Perhaps the CO even bilged him during HIS NJP during which he got a punitive letter of reprimand. I'm confused as to why the XO was reading emails in his stateroom during small boat ops. And I'm even more confused as to why the EN1 boat engineer would not have put his life vest on correctly. So, the CO and XO are to blame for that young man's stupidity?

Where

do you think the XO should have been? The NAVY says he should have been on the bridge, but what would that have done? He still would not have known PO1 was not wearing his life jacket properly. Being on the bridge would not have prevented the lines getting tangled or the accident from happening. The CO said he did not require the XO on the bridge for small boat ops, so the XO was in his stateroom reading military email about transferring Marines to another ship, details of the Admiral & his staff leaving the ship and other ship operations(helo ops and other small boat ops).

I do agree that the higher ups are probably fuming over this, but they also had the power to drop the charges before the trial started.

GOOD QUESTION

I've been out of the Navy for a long time and was not a deck type so I don't really remember where any of our XOs were during small boat ops.

I haven't read the JAGMAN investigation so I don't know why charges were brought against the XO, but the mere fact of his refusal to accept NJP would be enough to annoy senior leadership. Someone signed off on the Article 32 and let the CM go forward and I'm guessing that someone was within the Fleet Forces Command structure. Lots of pressure from the dead sailor's family.

The testimony of the coxswain yesterday was telling - the engines on the boat wouldn't start. Isn't the pre-launch engine test the duty of the boat engineer?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features