69°
forecast

Two file suit after ouster in no-show employee scandal

Posted to: News Norfolk

NORFOLK

Saying they were scapegoats, two former employees of the Norfolk Community Services Board who were forced out in the scandal over a no-show worker have filed a defamation lawsuit against the board and its director.

They allege that Executive Director Maureen Womack and city attorneys know why Jill McGlone remained on paid leave for 12 years but have not revealed the reason to the public.

Anthony Crisp, former clinical services director, and Linda Berardi, former human resources officer, say in separate lawsuits that they have no knowledge of why it occurred.

Each is seeking as much as $500,000 in compensatory damages, plus as much as $350,000 in punitive damages against Womack, who announced at a news conference Sept. 3 that she had accepted resignations from Crisp and Berardi in connection with the investigation over why McGlone was paid.

Womack also said she had terminated Brenda Wise, director of administration; Laurie Paquin, executive assistant; and accepted the resignation of Suzanne Williams, chief financial officer. The action followed an investigation by her and the city attorney's office into why McGlone was not taken off a paid suspension that commenced in 1998 when she was accused of having a weapon on the board's property.

Findings were being turned over to police and the FBI, Womack said at the news conference.

The Community Services Board is a government agency with a $25 million budget to provide substance abuse and mental health services. Although employees work for the board and not the city, the board is legally represented by the office of Norfolk City Attorney Bernard A. Pishko.

Womack declined to comment on the suits Wednesday, and Pishko did not respond to an e-mail sent late in the afternoon. He has said the investigation by Womack and a deputy in his office did not yield an answer to why McGlone remained on the payroll.

Crisp, Berardi and Paquin, through attorneys, have said they did nothing wrong and had inquired about McGlone's status to supervisors.

In the lawsuit, Crisp and Berardi say Womack knew her statements about them were not correct.

"When Womack and other persons speaking on behalf of the NCSB made public comments criticizing and blaming Crisp and the other employees... there was a clear purpose - to shift blame," Crisp's lawsuit says.

They allege that the McGlone situation involves "Womack and others at the highest levels within the NCSB and City of Norfolk."

Crisp and Berardi say a cloud of suspicion hangs over them and they are unable to find jobs in their profession.

In interviews with The Virginian-Pilot in September, Berardi said she mentioned McGlone numerous times over several years to Wise, who had suspended McGlone. Crisp said Wise once told him it "would all be over soon."

Even a supervisor at city Human Resources inquired in February 2009 about why McGlone was still getting paid, according to an e-mail Berardi sent to Wise that day. McGlone remained on the payroll until Womack, who started at the board in February 2009, found out around late May of this year.

Patrick Wilson, (757) 222-3893, patrick.wilson@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

CSB Scandal

As I stated before, it does not surprise me, as all 40 CSBs do as they want. There is no real oversight from DBHDS, they all get slapped on the wrist. The Performance Contracts that they must adhere yearly is a joke. Only when people of Virginia become involved in government, will there be ay real changes. Americans are too complacent and we allow the few to rule for the many. It is past time for taxpayers to get involved so that our money can stop being wasted.

Ms. Womack did her job and did it well

Ms Womack took the actions we all knew that had to be taken; Fire the whole incompetent bunch. I hope we learned something here and if we discover a ghost employee in the future there should be jail time for those that didn't take the appropriate action. No good deed goes unpunished in Norfolk.

Smoking Gun

I'm still curious to know what the quid pro quo was for McGlone to be on the payroll for so long. Someone at the CSB must have been a compromised position to allow this to go on for so long.

no need for lawsuits

No need to get tied up with lawyers-just place them on administrative leave with pay.

There is nothing new here---

Just another day in the City of Entitlement where you really don't have to do your job nor take responsibility for what you do or don't do. You just have to show up --- once in awhile and make it look good. If you do get into trouble just play the race or gender card and everything will be just fine!

it warms my heart to know

No matter how they try to spin this stuff the cool aid just tastes bad to others too. Isn't Socialism wonderful? Won't it be swell when we are outright communist?

they want lawsuits?

These thieves want lawsuits? how about the taxpayers sue THESE TWO for the lost money AND their salaries over the period of the crime? How about we LOCK THEM UP for criminal negligence, betraying the public trust, grand larceny, fraud.....? No doubt they'll resurface on obama's inner staff..... they have the qualifications.

When the Norfolk City

When the Norfolk City Manager is set to walk off into the sunset with 213K plus, why shouldn't others file lawsuits to get financial reward, especially those who are possibly no more than scapegoats? Until the top tier corrects their criminal behavior, what's good for the goose will continue to be good for the gander. Those wrongfully harmed permanently is a completely separate issue from what the kingmakers are doing.

Did you not read this

Did you not read this article or any of the others pertaining to it? These people say they had nothing to do with the woman being paid for 12 years. They say they asked about this woman, and were told not to worry about it. In this country it is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around. They -at the moment- are not the thieves. They may have not made the best choice in ignoring the situation, but when your boss gives you an order, you follow it. And frankly, with the number of people who have quietly resigned over this issue, I tend to believe these two people may truly have had nothing to do with it.

Re: Did you not read this

I felt the same way when I read the post you were referring to. Basically, there are a few people who know why the employee was on paid leave for 12 years. Funny, I think that person now has an attorney to speak for them, right? Funny, how Congress has the time to call major league baseball players to ask them questions,but seems for 12 years no one asked the right questions in Norfolk or did they and that is why these two people were fired.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox