69°
forecast

Audit: Norfolk officials knew of light-rail overruns, kept silent

Posted to: Light Rail News Norfolk Traffic - Transportation

NORFOLK

Several high-ranking city officials knew light-rail costs were skyrocketing as early as 2007 but failed to reveal the information in a timely manner, a state audit has found.

City Manager Regina V.K. Williams, former City Councilman W. Randy Wright and Assistant City Manager Stanley A. Stein knew about overruns and did not immediately divulge that information, the audit says.

All three denied this week that they intentionally withheld information. Wright and Williams said they delayed informing the council only once, in 2009, and that was for about a month. They were fearful that news of escalating expenses would jeopardize state money for the project, they said.

Councilman Paul R. Riddick, who chairs the Hampton Roads Transit board that is managing the light-rail project, said after reading the report, he believes Williams, Stein and Wright withheld vital information from the council.

"They were not forthcoming with the council. As a result, we've got a real mess," he said.

The Virginia Department of Transportation's inspector general conducted the audit, released this week, at the request of Hampton Roads Transit's new president because of concerns about cost overruns.

The state inspector general indicated that HRT officials intentionally misled federal, state and some city officials about the amount of the overruns, to the point of maintaining a second set of books.

HRT is constructing the city's 7.4-mile light-rail line, the biggest public works project in Norfolk's history. It is expected to open in May.

Originally slated to cost $232 million, the budget has ballooned to $338 million. It is being paid for with city, federal and state money. Norfolk is responsible for overruns.

Mayor Paul Fraim said he doesn't believe the council was misled.

"If they knew, what was their motivation not to tell us?" Fraim said. "They've never pulled a punch before, and I find it hard to believe they did in this case."

Williams is stepping down as city manager in January in part because of the light-rail costs. Stein will be the interim city manager. Wright, the driving force behind light rail, was defeated in May in part because of light rail's escalating budget.

The report based its findings partly on the e-mails of former HRT President and CEO Michael Townes, who was forced to resign in January.

In December 2007, Townes e-mailed Stein that contracts were coming in millions over budget, the audit says. Stein told Townes that Williams likely would inform the council either in a meeting or by a confidential memo.

"As you can imagine, we (read that at least I) am sensitive that we don't have newspaper accounts of overages so early into the project," Stein wrote.

The council was briefed on light rail in January 2008 and was told that changes due to requests from Norfolk State University would cause the project to go over budget. No firm figures were provided.

Williams had the final say on what information was revealed to the council and when, she and Stein have said.

The audit indicates that Williams knew weeks after that meeting that two light-rail contracts were a combined $24 million over the budget and did not report that to the council. Moreover, the audit indicates that in May 2008, Norfolk officials were told the project could be as much as $47 million over budget. Again, that information was not immediately divulged.

Williams said updates were often presented to the council in one-on-one conversations the auditor was not privy to.

The audit indicates that in a closed meeting in June 2008, the council was briefed on rising costs. The state obtained a copy of the presentation, in which the council was learned the project could be as much as $49 million over budget.

That private briefing had not been publicly disclosed. The Virginia Freedom of Information Act does not generally allow for budget updates in closed sessions.

In September 2008, after The Virginian-Pilot reported that city officials were frustrated that they had not received an updated budget from Townes, he sent an e-mail to an HRT staffer.

"Unfortunately we allowed ourselves to be set up by Stanley and Regina," he wrote. "They have had detailed estimates since April that have been updated regularly. We didn't provide 'all the back-up' which gave them the excuse they wanted to 'diss' us."

In another HRT e-mail from the same day, a staffer wrote: "In my opinion, this gives us the opening to lay it on the line about how and what info we have provided and has not been communicated to council."

Taxpayers did not learn about any cost overruns until December 2008, when The Pilot reported that light rail was running about $56 million over budget.

That figure was found in documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

Townes e-mailed Wright in February 2009, warning that changes requested by the city "have created additional unforeseen costs."

In May 2009, an exchange between Townes and an HRT staffer that was copied to Wright indicated that Stein did not yet want threats to the budget reported to the council.

Stein said that's true, but is was taken out of context.

"I did not want that to be reported, but only because HRT told us they did not yet have good numbers," he said. "The numbers kept changing, from week to week and sometimes from day to day. It was very frustrating."

In mid-2009, the audit says that Williams, Stein and Wright "were provided information regarding threats" to the light-rail budget that would eventually cause a second round of massive cost overruns. "Documents support that full disclosure of threats to the project... were not provided to all members of the Norfolk city council," it says.

Williams said she heard rumors about rising costs in 2009.

When she asked Townes, she said he repeatedly delayed giving her figures.

"I'm not going to the City Council to tell them I'm hearing a rumor," she said.

Wright said last year that he, Fraim and other city officials agreed to keep the costs a secret for about a month to allow the Commonwealth Transportation Board to approve $20 million in funding.

"All hell broke loose once the story about cost overruns ran," he said. "Had that happened before the meeting, the guys on the board would have run for cover.

"I was protecting my city. That $20 million would have come out of Norfolk's budget."

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

oh, so they agreed to mislead an agency

"Wright said last year that he, Fraim and other city officials agreed to keep the costs a secret for about a month to allow the Commonwealth Transportation Board to approve $20 million in funding."

Yeah. That's conspiracy and fraud. How many years would you or I serve for conspiracy and fraud??? 8? 10?

TOD Developer Mike Barrett from Light Rail Now speaks ....

Light Rail Now Talking Point #2: (shoot/discredit the messenger, distract the public away from HRT)

"Yes, the mob has spoken; guilty as charged, string them up. Sort of like the McCarthy hearings."

Don't address the facts revealed, attack the folks upset about the facts of HRT's corruption. Then claim all is well now ...

Light Rail Now Talking Point #3: (all is well now)

"...if there are remaining management issues, I believe they will be corrected and we will learn from them."

Light Rail Now Talking Point #4: (Light rail is a "need")

"...the need for the extension of the light rail system remains"

Need? For whom? Developers and special interest perhaps, not taxpayers or commuters.

VDOT is a "mob" according to Mike Barrett!

Light Rail Now leader Mike Barrett writes this:

"Yes, the mob has spoken; guilty as charged, string them up. Sort of like the McCarthy hearings."

But wait - isn't it true that VDOT wrote the report? Is VDOT a "mob" that is "Sort of like the McCarthy hearings"???

By a show of hands, who here believes that? Humm, let's see ... okay - ONE. Um Mike, you can put your hand down now, I already counted you.

Mob psychology

Yes, the mob has spoken; guilty as charged, string them up. Sort of like the McCarthy hearings. Of course, it would be smart to get the facts before responding to an "audit" based upon conversation, interviews, and speculation about motives, which are dutifully reported by the press. Frankly, those aren't facts, they are accusations. Of course, Shucet has already straightened HRT out quite effectively, and despite some cost overruns, the Norfolk system is still the cheapest in the country. That said, if there are remaining management issues, I believe they will be corrected and we will learn from them. That said, the need for the extension of the light rail system remains, and clearly, the City of Virginia Beach will not allow the same.

"Norfolk system still the cheapest in the country"

Undocumented comments. Seems we have had a lot to shovel out of the way with all the other brown stuff pushed our way to cover up the real mess.

Oh really?

So you don't think the IG report is true? Don't you think that HRT would be falling over themselves denying the 'accusations' of two sets of books, keep vital costs incurred from the feds? No Mike, we know you in there for damage control. I don't think you would use the same kid gloves if someone like Bob McDonnell 'should have known this' for failed to provide a means of oversite. Fact is Mike, the only people that 'need' light rail is you and your colleagues. The rest of us don't. Otherwise the properties and your investments stand to be 'de-railed'.

The Train has left the tracks

Well, the Grover Norquist anti-tax zealot boo birds of the moribund VBTA were right all along. The practice of unelected, appointed HR entities controlling taxpayers money has reared it's ugly head once again. Of course it will be asserted that the VBTA, Bill Howell, et..al and the Republican house of delegates are to blame for HRT's two sets of books because the truth was foretold that the light rail project for Norfolk and soon to be forced down the throats of VB was underbid, not worthy of federal funds, and too expensive. I will still lay odds that the majority on VB council will sternly warn HRT, smack them on the hands, and tell them not to be naughty again. Then give them another chance to shaft VB. Is it really worth it?

Q & A

Q: Is it really worth it?

A: No.

Agreed

Only time will tell if VB City Council will now listen to the boo-birds. I still believe council will find a way to excuse the behavior of HRT and the higher ups in Norfolk city government. There were too many campaign promises made and much donated money to let this TOD plan blow away in the wind. They'll find a way. The silence from the Light Rail Now crowd is deafening. I guess I'll stay tuned.

Oh, HENRY! Oh, MIKE!

We're waiting for you to come and tell us how wonderful Light Rail will be in Virginia Beach!?

We're still waiting for you to come and call the lies, two sets of accounting books and disinformation campaign waged by HRT has been nothing more than an "unfortunate incident" or some other euphemism to cover up fraud in government.

Won't you please tell us again how we're missing out on the future of transportation and how cool we'll all be once we have an over-priced train to carry us to and fro?

Remember folks-remember who supports and defends this project and insists on ramming it down the throat of VB taxpayers.

Remember and vote NO.

The only thing "light" about this deal is the feeling in your wallets.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    Traffic - Transportation rss feed   



Toolbox