The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
Gary Crouse had been in the Navy just a few years the last time the government considered allowing gay men and women to openly serve in the military. This time around, he's retired and watching from the sidelines.
Crouse, 54, left the Navy in 2007 after 20 years as an electronics technician. Throughout his career, he didn't discuss being gay.
When he entered, being gay was forbidden. Then, in the early 1990s, President Bill Clinton tried to change the law and failed, leaving the military with a compromise known as "don't ask, don't tell."
"Maybe it's better it happens now," Crouse said Tuesday, the day the Pentagon released a report concluding that repealing the policy would have minimal impact on military readiness.
Crouse said the U.S. military should reflect the American tenet that all people are created equal.
"Just because you feel uncomfortable around some people doesn't mean you can discriminate against them," he said.
Crouse will speak this morning at a forum hosted by Human Rights Campaign at Five Points Community Farm Market in Norfolk. He'll be joined by two other veterans who favor repealing the policy: David Crandall of Norfolk, a straight man who retired from the Navy in 1983; and Aiden Vox of Richmond who was discharged from the Army under "don't ask, don't tell."
Crouse is new to public advocacy but said he feels called to share his experiences.
"As a gay veteran, it seems like it's my responsibility to help out as much as I can," he said.
Repealing the ban on openly gay service members would make the military stronger, he argued - partly because gay service members would be able to concentrate on doing their jobs without worrying about being outed and booted from the military.
"For those currently in, it will lift a really big burden off their shoulders," Crouse said.
He believes young sailors, like young people in general, are more tolerant of gays and lesbians in their midst.
"As a free society that reportedly is about individual rights, to ask somebody to hide who they are is ridiculous," Crouse said. "I think the younger people really don't care anymore who people are sleeping with, or love."
David Crandall has been out of the military for 27 years, but he's certain that the armed forces should finally acknowledge the service of gay and lesbian members already in the ranks.
"I think it's got to be done," said Crandall, a nuclear-trained machinist's mate who served on one surface ship and four submarines. "I'm against any kind of discrimination for any reason."
Crandall remembers the difficulties of integrating women onto ships. He served aboard a submarine tender that had 45 women assigned soon after the Navy allowed mixed-gender crews aboard support ships. He's still bothered by how badly they were treated, but he's proud that the military has been on what he called "the cutting edge" of integrating marginalized communities, including blacks and women.
He isn't worried about how gay and lesbian military members will be integrated into the ranks - they're already there.
"They've been serving forever," Crandall said.
Kate Wiltrout, (757) 446-2629, kate.wiltrout@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Senator McCain
Interesting that now that the results of the study show that the majority of service members are fine with homosexuals' serving openly, Senator McCain is now slamming the study itself as flawed. Before the results were in, he was all about waiting to see what it said before moving forward with the repeal of DADT. It would appear that he was willing to bet that the results would be in agreement with his views, and now that they aren't, instead of abiding by the study, he slams the study itself. Where was his critique of the study long before this? What a piece of work, huh?
Question: What happened to
Question: What happened to the service members that were pictured on the front page of the Virginian Pilot handcuffed to the fence in front of the White House? Did the Navy go to Captains Mast, and did the others face the same type of punishment for protesting in uniform?? Or has that changed too?? And also, by them doing that, it tells me that they are gay as well. Still something they shouldnt have done until this is finalized. What a shame and waste of service.
Not so....
Well, about protesting in uniform, yes, that's against the UCMJ. But as far as assuming someone is homosexual because they fight for the rights of homosexuals.....???? Were there no whites that fought alongside MLK Jr during the civil rights movement? In short, yes. I am 100% heterosexual and I am a 100% honorable veteran, and I support the repeal of DADT 100%. In fact, I'm going to law school next fall and if this is still an issue in 3 1/2 years, I'd be happy to represent any American citizen who is experiencing discrimination due to his or her sexual orientation. It's wrong....I'm sure there were bigots defending the Jim Crow laws 60 years ago, also.
I believe they had already
I believe they had already been discharged at the time the photo was taken.
As an aside,oarticipating in the demonstrationis not necessarily an admission of sexual orientation. Heterosexual present and former members of the military support dropping DADT also.
Passing this bill will not suddenly open the gates to gays
I*f this bill passes there will be no headlines about the first gay to enter the military. I know gays have been serving in the military at least since least the Vietnam era. There were gays in my unit, everyone knew, no one cared. All this bill will do is to stop any possible blackmail towards gay and let their partners have the same rights has non gays do. The surveys say there will be no real problems, public polls say the bill should be passed, most generals say the bill should be p0assed. Pass the danged bill.
Sick of this!
I am absolutely tired of this subject...the media, especially TV shows, and movies, attempt to cram this gay stuff down our throats and I'm not buying it...and not UNTIL a same sex gay couple can actually procreate another human being, it's just not the way nature intended it...plain and simple.
Heteros Using Birth Control
And I'm tired of all these heteros using birth control. I think that everytime you breeders have sex you should get pregnant. Take all women out of the workforce and the military and put them in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant. Oh, yeah and take away their right to vote and to be educated. Take away my multiple degrees and kill my children, because I'm no longer a breeder the way your G-d expects me to be. Stone me please!
So heterosexual couples in
So heterosexual couples in which the woman is unable to have children should not be permitted to be together? Perhaps we should just stone barren women since, according to your comment, "it's just not the way nature intended it."
Thank you!
Some people are so blinded by their own bigotry they don't see the failure in their own "logic". Reductum ad absurdum, plain and simple.
If we still lived by
If we still lived by nature's rules alone (where are these, by the way - love to read a copy), we'd still be living in mud huts and hunting small game with clubs and sharp rocks!
No cooking, either. Nature didn't intend for man to harness the power of fire.