71°
forecast

McDonnell asks state workers to pay 5 percent for pensions

Posted to: News State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Changes proposed to the state pension system by Gov. Bob McDonnell on Thursday would require government workers to contribute money toward their retirements as part of a strategy to keep the system financially sound.

In the governor's plan, thousands of government employees at agencies across the state - possibly including local school teachers - would be called on to contribute 5 percent of their pre tax salaries to their pensions starting next year. Before 2010, Virginia covered the state and employee share of retirement contributions as part of a deal with workers dating to 1983, when the state couldn't fund pay raises.

That changed this year when the General Assembly amended state law to require workers hired after July 1 to pay toward their pensions. McDonnell's new plan would hold old and new employees to the same standard going forward.

The announcement came a day before the governor plans to release his full budget amendments.

McDonnell said the state also would boost its pension contribution for employees by 2 percent and look to offset the new cost to workers by building a 3 percent pay raise into the budget for those employed before July 1 of this year.

Still, the net effect would be a 2 percent reduction in take-home pay for roughly 87,000 employees. Eligible Virginia employees received a 3 percent bonus this month, but they have gone without raises for several years.

The loss of pay could be temporarily mitigated by a 2 percent bonus McDonnell has proposed for workers next year; it is contingent on the state producing sufficient savings to fund it.

Those ideas weren't welcomed by the Virginia Governmental Employees Association on Thursday.

"We have deep concerns about his proposal to have current state employees begin contributing 5 percent of their salary to the retirement system," said VGEA executive director R. Ronald Jordan. "While the governor is attempting to keep employee salaries whole in the proposal, he relies on a potential pay bonus using year-end savings in the state budget to do so. The net affect is that without the bonus, state employees could face a pay cut amounting to a little over 2 percent."

McDonnell, who previously expressed opposition to changing the contributions, said adjustments are necessary to address a projected shortfall in the pension fund, which totals $17.6 billion, according to a recent report by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission.

"If I don't make these changes... we're going to have a broken system and the problems are only going to get worse," he said. "And so rather than put off for some other governor to fix this, I've looked the employees in the eyes, and been honest and said, 'There's no way this is going to get fixed without the employee paying something and the employer, the commonwealth, paying more.' "

Earlier this year, Virginia withheld a roughly $620 million investment to its pension fund to help balance the state budget. The state is scheduled to repay that obligation over 10 years.

In addition to state workers, local governments and some of their employees could feel the financial pinch of the governor's proposed changes.

As many as 130,000 public school teachers would receive a 2 percent bump in employer contribution to their pensions, a cost that would be split between Virginia and its localities. The local share of that is nearly $105 million.

Overall, McDonnell's revisions would pump about $311 million into the pension fund next year.

Changes made to the retirement system this year also gave local governments and school systems the ability to require new hires to contribute the 5 percent employee share, though few around the state did, according to Virginia Retirement System data.

In Hampton Roads, however, several cities exercised that authority.

Chesapeake, Portsmouth, Suffolk and Virginia Beach required new public employees to cover their share of pension costs, but the corresponding school divisions in those cities did not, according to the Virginia Retirement System.

Each of those localities has selected VRS as its retirement plan, while many of Norfolk's employees are part of a separate retirement system, the official added.

The governor's plan would permit localities to require employees and teachers to pay 5 percent toward their pensions, but only if the local government gives them a raise of at least 3 percent. All those costs would be borne by local governments.

If governments adopted that plan, local employees and teachers could lose some of their earnings, said Robley Jones of the Virginia Education Association, which recently asked the state to fund 3 percent raises for its members.

"Teachers get the short end of the stick, comparatively," Jones said.

School officials in Chesapeake, Norfolk and Virginia Beach said they are waiting to see firm numbers from the state before commenting on McDonnell's proposal.

But the prospect of making employees pay more toward their retirements in these economic times left Norfolk Sheriff Bob McCabe miffed.

"Our people haven't had a raise for three years, and are now being asked to take a 5 percent pay cut," he said. "Most of our people are making less than $30,000 per year. Honestly, I don't know how some of them are going to make it."

Pilot writers Aaron Applegate, Elisabeth Hulette, Harry Minium and Steven Vegh contributed to this report.

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

All of Us Work for Each Other

State employees pay taxes, especially this year on the supposed bonus received, at a rate exceeding 40% of the amount realized on this one-time dropping from the eagle. The mac-man should have really kept his pennies at home on this one and applied that minor stipend directly to the retirement fund to cover past snatchings for this project and that. Since state employees do pay taxes, in part, they pay themselves and other associates in the career paths chosen for the benefit of the Commonwealth. It is very likely that over 80% of the state's classified employees could do as good a job or even function better as state legislators than 110% of those already in office, including the macaca mac-man.

the bottom is getting ready to drop out on state pensions

One comment says WE need to look out for loyal public employees. Really? Most TAXPAYER funded state pension plans are on the brink of insolvency. Why should public employees not bear even a small percentage of the burden of something that benefits them? How is this not their problem too? How else do they propose we solve this? Oh wait, I know, the classic answer: raise TAXES. Most of US are already to the point where we cannot afford to pay MORE in taxes to accommodate YOUR retirement. This needed to be done a long time ago.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61H13X20100218

http://money.cnn.com/2010/06/16/news/economy/pension_fund_crisis.fortune/index.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/09/business/09pension.html

Need to look out for loyal employees

I understand budgets, financial planning, and that we have to look at ways of making things work. But asking employees to pay 5% of their pay towards retirement after working for the state for years is wrong. I am a 20 year state employee. Soon after I started state employees went 4 years or more without any pay raises. We will never be able to get the money lost from no pay raises back. State employees have been have gone without raises for the past 2 years and medical insurance has done nothing but gone up. Some of these state employees are barely making ends meet now. Taking additional monies out of their checks is going to hurt these individuals. Grandfather those state employees prior to July 1, 2010.

Yet another way to injure teachers...

Given our entire school district cut teachers pay his year AND also now requires them to pay for health insurance, this is just another way teachers are being trashed and why so many are quitting.

this will hurt us as well

Local TAXPAYERS will be on the hook for a 3% raise while teachers will be on the hook for contributing 2% of their existing salary to fund a program that BENEFITS them? Who is benefiting and who is losing on this deal? YOUR TAXPAYER funded pensions are in TROUBLE and you feel like you shouldn't have to do anything to help. Why should you bear no responsibility? Teachers are always being trashed and quitting? How many teachers enjoyed a snow day off today? How many private sector workers enjoyed one? Must be something else besides pay worth staying for. Hopefully you will think about that during your 2 week holiday break.

In all fairness, you're only

In all fairness, you're only required to pay a very small percentage of health insurance.

REcommendation isn't hitting only teachers.

It will affect all state employees. At least part of your salary comes from the locality.

They're still in the same

They're still in the same boat. Locality funding hasn't made any difference, and they're participating in VRS just as all other state employees.

Guess how much of mine I

Guess how much of mine I pay?

100%

perhaps you should have made

perhaps you should have made better choices in life.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners