The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
Rear Adm. David Titley admits he used to be a skeptic about global warming. That was years ago. Now he is leading Navy efforts to better understand and cope with climate change.
Titley spoke Thursday night at Old Dominion University as part of the Blue Planet Forum, a free lecture series about environmental issues facing Hampton Roads and Virginia.
Climate change, Titley told a standing-room-only crowd, "is a strategic challenge, and it's incredibly important we get it right."
Asked about skeptics of the scientific theory that man-made emissions are accelerating the slow warming of the Earth, Titley smiled and referenced the movie "Thelma and Louise."
He showed a slide from the 1991 classic, of Thelma and Louise's car going over a cliff in a suicidal plunge, and said: "One option is to hold hands, pretend it doesn't exist, put your foot on the accelerator and see what happens.
"I don't recommend this option," Titley added, "but it's an option nonetheless."
What Titley does suggest is a methodical, detailed, worldwide analysis of the problem, constantly being adjusted with new data, followed by specific actions to overcome consequences such as flooding, lost wetlands, erosion, inundation and threats to food supplies, fresh water and natural resources.
Rising sea levels have Titley forecasting for a future Navy that anticipates instability and weaknesses - not only at sea, but also in protecting military bases near vulnerable shorelines, including Norfolk Naval Station.
As the Navy's chief oceanographer and director of Task Force Climate Change, an international group of more than 450 government and academic experts, Titley said Hampton Roads is "in the first tier" of an in-depth review of military options. The report is expected in 2012.
But his folksy, brass-tacks explanation of what is happening to the planet got the most attention.
"We know the climate is changing," he said. "There's just too much data showing it.
"As a navigator, you learn never to trust just one individual data point. If, for example, we just had the ice melting in the Arctic, OK, we could debate that. But all the data lines up in a single picture. It's all there. It all adds up."
Before the event, Titley met with academics at ODU to discuss their new initiative to make the university a hub for research into rising sea levels. He invited ODU to join his task force.
The school is launching a multi disciplinary approach to rising seas, one involving all six colleges at the university, from engineering to risk management to psychology to public communications.
Titley was asked whether the military is responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than the rest of American society. His answer: No.
"We are 2 percent of the U.S. fuel budget," he said.
He also was asked whether climate change can be seen as a natural cycle of the Earth simply evolving, as it has done before.
"If this is a natural spike, then lets's go back to basic physics. The air temperature is rising. The ocean is warmer. What changed to make that happen? I ask that question to people who raise this argument and never get a good answer."
He predicted the Bering Strait between Alaska and Russia will become a key shipping lane as sea ice melts away, and he applauded the Navy's commitment to cut its greenhouse gas em issions 50 percent by 2020.
He said the military is studying how to turn algae into an affordable biofuel as well as testing portable power sources, alternative-energy vehicles and other ways to reduce "our strategic vulnerability to oil."
Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


who in the world are you to contradict established beliefs?
Admiral, sir.
I think you need to ask your bosses if you are allowed to say something backed up only by science and 97% of the entire scientific community, WE all know that laymen, Glenn Beck, and true believers know much better than those of you liberal elitist Ph.ds.
So sir, remember that ideology is MUCH MUCH more important in this state than scientific "Facts"!
Take your science somewhere else!
Well said
Too bad there people who will take you seriously, and won't believe you would malign their Glorious Leader HRH Beck.
Just follow the $$$
"Titley met with academics at ODU to discuss their new initiative to make the university a hub for research into rising sea levels."
Good job ADM Bling Bling
Skeptic time….
I wonder when the good Admiral retires from the Navy and where he will be working once he does? Any bets he’s raking in the big bucks as a champion of Global Warming is man-made crowd, like Al Gore?
recognition or denial
As usual, this topic brings out those who want to blame everything on Obama, Bush, GOP, Dems, the military, scientists, universities, anything that won't interfere with their own actions, or require them admit that they might be wrong, and to modify those actions. I would only hope we all have enough foresight to keep flotation devices on hand, and plans to move infrastructure to higher ground. To quote Cosby, "How long can you tread water?".
We are to be good stewards period
With that said, there would be no man made global warming cause discussion. Folks "the sky is Not falling". Do you understand the fundamentals of science? The earth's characteristics have changed many, many times and will continue to do so. Just be good stewards, the rest will take care of itself.
Cancun Climate Boondoggle…
Again, Global Warming has little to do with science and everything to do with personal agendas. Money plus other bizarre world views. Just when you think the activists can't become more nuts...
"Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, invoked the ancient jaguar goddess Ixchel in her opening statement to delegates gathered in Cancun, Mexico, noting that Ixchel was not only goddess of the moon, but also "the goddess of reason, creativity and weaving"...."
"Excellencies, the goddess Ixchel would probably tell you that a tapestry is the result of the skilful interlacing of many threads,"
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/post-carbon/2010/11/cancun_talks_start_with_a_call.html
I miss the days
when admirals concentrated on military matters, especially during a time of armed conflict, and didn't dabble in politics.
So ... which is it? (continued)
Apologies for the previous truncated post.
June 24, 1974, Time Magazine: "Scientists figure that only a 1% decrease in the amount of sunlight hitting the earth's surface could tip the climatic balance, and cool the planet enough to send it sliding down the road to another ice age within only a few hundred years."
So ... which is it?
July 9, 1971, Washington Post: “The world could be as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age. In the next 50 years — or by 2021 — fossil-fuel dust injected by man into the atmosphere could screen out so much sunlight that the average temperature could drop by six degrees, resulting in a buildup of new glaciers that could eventually cover huge areas. If sustained over several years, five to 10, such a temperature decrease could be sufficient to trigger an ice age."
June 24, 1974, Time Magazine: "Scientists figure that only a 1% decrease in the amount of sunlight hitting the earth's surface could tip the climatic balance, and cool the planet enough to send it sliding down the road to another ice age within only a