The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
The City Council will decide tonight whether to provide more financial guarantees that a developer says are needed to build an office building in a low-income community that officials believe is desperate for new life.
Tivest Development of Chesapeake agreed last year to build the six-story Midtown Office Tower on city property at the corner of Tidewater Drive and Virginia Beach Boulevard.
Now, Tivest officials want the city to guarantee 65 percent of rent payments for space the Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project will lease. The guarantee would kick in only if STOP could not pay its rent.
STOP, a private social services provider funded largely with government dollars, would pay annual rents of more than $2 million for more than 100,000 square feet. If the council agrees to Tivest's request, it would mean the city could be on the hook for more than $12 million.
Mayor Paul Fraim called the risk minimal Monday and said he will urge the council to vote yes. He said that even if STOP were unable to pay its rent, the city would lease the office space.
"This is about creating jobs," he said.
"The STOP organization has been around 46 years, and they have an excellent record of paying their bills. There are always reasons not to do things. I don't think that's a reason not to do this."
Tivest head Dwight Etheridge, who grew up in the nearby Tidewater Gardens public housing project, said prospective lenders demanded the guarantee.
"But this is still a good deal for the city," he said.
Tivest's request is the latest financial guarantee it has asked of the city since it signed a deal to develop the property last March. At the time, community leaders praised the $32.7 million project after learning it would bring 150 permanent jobs to an area ringed with public housing.
To get the project built, the city agreed in 2008 to help subsidize the development by providing the land, about $500,000 in infrastructure improvements, and a $490,000 tax subsidy.
Then, early last year, Tivest requested and the city agreed to lease 60,000 square feet of the building and move its Human Services employees there. In return, Tivest agreed to pay $1.2 million for the land and give the city the right to buy its portion of the office space.
Although the rent over 12 years would cost millions of dollars more than the city is currently paying, Norfolk leaders said it was worth the cost to jump-start economic development in the area and would provide additional tax revenue.
Tivest was scheduled to begin construction last year but, according to documents obtained from the city under the Freedom of Information Act, acknowledged last June that it was unable to obtain financing.
It remains unclear whether Fraim, Vice Mayor Anthony L. Burfoot and Councilman Paul R. Riddick, the project's main council proponents, can muster a majority tonight.
Councilman Tommy Smigiel is opposed. "I cannot support any deals that cost the taxpayers additional money," he said, citing a recent announcement from the school system that it faces a $21 million deficit.
Council members Angelia Williams, Barclay C. Winn, Andy Protogyrou and Theresa Whibley said they will wait to hear a presentation today from Rod Woolard, the city's director of economic development.
There has been no public discussion of the latest Tivest proposal. The council discussed the issue in closed session on Dec. 21. Information on how the Tivest deal would be amended was not released in writing to council members until Monday afternoon.
The city has been trying to develop the property since 2002, when it acquired and tore down the Red Carpet Inn, a hotel officials said was notorious for harboring drug dealers.
Former NFL star and Norfolk native Bruce Smith and downtown businessman Jim Baylor both submitted proposals for office projects on the site that were rejected by the city.
Smith's project would have been similar to Tivest's and asked the city to lease the entire building at $19.50 per square foot. Baylor proposed a smaller, less ambitious project for 65,000 square feet of office space at about $16 per square foot.
The city will lease office space from Tivest at $21 per square foot.
Baylor currently leases a 60,000-square-foot building the city uses for Human Services on Monticello Avenue, but that lease expires July 1. Correspondence between Baylor and the city indicates he has offered several extensions to the city at rents from $14.85 to $17.75 per square foot depending on the length of the lease.
Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Earth to City Council
Drive around the city; the streets are lined with commercial property and office space for sale or rent. In fact, I'm sure you can find several in the general area in which this project is located.
The remainder of the streets are lined with properties for sale--a lot of them vacant, and property values are decreasing rapidly. Where does council think they're going to get the revenue to pay for all their wasteful projects?
That a project such as this is even considered at any time, but especially in this economic climate, is the height of irresponsibility.
Please stop considering the
Please stop considering the fact that the building is in a crime ridden area. City hall is in a crime ridden area next to what you may call a ghetto as our entire downtown area is. The deal is what it is Norfolk only deals with private investors that is how city council keeps their friends happy. We do not choose who does any work for the city and if any one in City Hall stands in the way they have to go (City Manager). Private investors have built everything from your libraries to light rail to the proposed tunnels who are these people and where are they coming from? At least TIVEST was one of our own now they will be taking our money to Chesapeake. We have a million things started and nothing finished that is not progress that is a mess.
Just Like The Questionable Activities of Norfolk CSB
This is just like Norfolk's CSB's lease for 225 Olney at 500K per year for a building that current tax assessment is less than 2.5 million and the owner paid significant less than that. Let's see.... paying off the mortage in 3-4 years - seems like somebody is getting rich at the Norfolk Taxpayers expense. CSB is also looking at leasing another building immediately adjacent an ABC Store and across from the Opera House. "Getting a great deal on it" and surprize, surprize, the owner of the facility is also building two half-way houses for the City of Norfolk. Somebody needs to investigate this and follow the money.
Hold on a sec
Isn't this Burfoot guy (city councel member and vice mayor who will vote on this) tied to Tivest and the Etheredge guy as an "investor" or partner? I believe you have a major conflict of interest going on that this Burfoot guy is in the middle of. Ah, yet another Norfolk SCAM being rammed down your throat and he doesn't care who thinks what. Norfolk shenanigans are part of the reason why I read this paper for a good local politician laugh.
Building
When will all this STOP.The city does not have this money.
AMAZING
It amazes me that certain members of Norfolk City Council believe it is ok to spend taxpayer’s money on projects like this. I am a Norfolk taxpayer and it is not ok. The city could be on the hook for 12 million dollars and the Mayor thinks the risk is minimal and for council to vote yes. Come on. The vote should be a unanimous NO. If the City of Norfolk has 12 million dollars to throw around, why don't they invest in their employees and give them much needed pay raises. They are willing to invest in Tivest, but not willing to invest in our teachers, firefighters, deputies, police officers, and other city workers. Additionally, Norfolk Public schools are being cut by 21 million. Get your priorities straight Norfolk City Council.
The reason is clear!
The developer can't get funding for a multi-million dollar project in a high risk, low income neighborhood ---I wonder why? Now they want the City to pay for everything, guarantee everything, and ask the taxpayers to pay for it. Kind of sounds like light rail with a different name huh?
Can we talk about the process?
The financial reasons this project should be rejected are one thing. There is simply no good justification financially for such a sweetheart deal for Tivest. Just as important in my view is the continued "ram it through" way it which tonight's vote is being conducted. Despite no city council meeting for the past 3 weeks, the agenda for this week's meeting was not posted until Sat., and without supporting documents. As noted in the story, even council members did not get much detailed information until late Monday. A citizen?? No chance of having this information before the vote. This item, R-8 on the agenda, states: "The amendments are being finalized and will not be available until the Informal Session of City Council on January 11, 2011".
Process Part II
So therefore, how on earth are citizens for or against going to have a prayer of being informed, let alone organized, before tonight's meeting?? Answer. They are locked out. As are council members not "in the know". Same old Norfolk politics. I noted with equal dismay Tommy Smigiel's comments here on Pilot Online about lack of citizen participation in council meetings and matters and should have replied then as I am now that it is darn hard to participate pro or con when business is conducted in a way that expressly precludes being able to so. Too little information always provided way too late to do anything about it. That is by design. And it should be despised and railed against by every Norfolk voter. Change it now council members!!!
Full disclosure
From the Virginia Public Access Project (vpap.org) - donations to Norfolk City Council Members campaigns from Tivest or Dwight Etheridge the CEO of Tivest:
Since 2006
Anthony Burfoot $3,750
Paul Fraim $2,500
Barclay Winn $1,000
Paul Riddick $1,000
Andy Protogyrou $500
Looks like Tivest has 5 votes!