70°
forecast

Obama OKs JFCOM closure; new cuts imperil 160 more jobs

Posted to: JFCOM Military News

Hampton Roads stands to lose at least another 160 jobs as part of Defense Secretary Robert Gates' plan to overhaul defense spending.

The details of Gates' plan, announced Thursday, raised red flags among some area leaders and regional advocates, who argued that Gates didn't offer enough specifics about how the cutbacks would save money or improve national defense.

Gates said he plans to decommission the Navy's Norfolk-based Second Fleet, turning over control of its ships and operations to Fleet Forces Command. Both are headquartered at Norfolk Naval Station. President Barack Obama on Thursday night also approved an earlier plan to shut down the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk and Suffolk.

None of the more than 120 ships would leave Norfolk, Gates said during a Pentagon news conference, but about 160 military positions could be eliminated.

"During the Cold War, this command had distinct and significant operational responsibilities," he said. "Today, its primary responsibility is training and mission preparation."

The Second Fleet was established in 1950 in Norfolk and has participated in several historic military operations, including a 1962 naval blockade during the Cuban missile crisis. It also trained more than half the Navy's ships that were deployed during operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm in 1990 and 1991.

Under the new arrangement, the Second Fleet ships would be under the direct command of Adm. John C. Harvey Jr., the four-star head of Fleet Forces Command.

In a memo from the White House, the president said he accepted Gates' plan to shut down JFCOM - a move he announced in August - on a date to be determined by Gates.

Pentagon officials have said they expect that some parts of the command could remain in the region but have not specified how many of JFCOM's 3,760 jobs in the region might remain.

Gates said that officials are "still refining the details but expect that roughly 50 percent of the capabilities under JFCOM will be kept and assigned to other organizations."

The statement doesn't shed light on how many jobs might be lost and what kinds of positions might remain, said Craig Quigley, who heads the taxpayer-funded Hampton Roads Military and Federal Facilities Alliance, which lobbies to protect the region's military assets.

Local members of Congress said they don't have enough information to judge whether the cuts proposed by Gates are defensible.

U.S. Rep. Scott Rigell, R-Virginia Beach, whose district includes the Second Fleet and JFCOM headquarters, said Gates' decision about Second Fleet is troubling because he didn't provide any data to justify the change.

U.S. Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Chesapeake, was more emphatic, saying he believes Gates' efforts are part of a larger effort by the Obama administration to restrict military spending so that the funds can be spent elsewhere.

"You have no analysis, no documentation," Forbes said. "You simply have the cut, and then you back fill the analysis."

Forbes, who has become chairman of the readiness subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee, has said he wants Congress to have a more direct role in setting defense priorities.

"We're going to be demanding audits of the Department of Defense," he said.

Gates also said the Navy will cut costs by reducing land-based staffs for submarines, patrol aircraft, destroyer squadrons and an aircraft carrier strike group.

The Navy was careful to point out that no ships, subs or aircraft will depart Norfolk or any other homeport as a result of the changes.

"We're going to streamline shore-based infrastructure by consolidating," said Lt. Courtney Hillson, a Navy spokeswoman. "But we're not moving any ships or planes - just people."

Gates said the Navy will use the savings to develop a new generation of electronic jammers and unmanned aircraft, and to buy more F/A-18 fighter jets, a new destroyer, a littoral combat ship, an ocean surveillance vessel and fleet oilers.

Pilot writer Lauren King contributed to this report.

Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

Corinne Reilly, (757) 446-2949, corinne.reilly@pilotonline.com

Obama accepts JFCOM closing


COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Why does Corinne Reilly put such a neg slant this community ?

I see yet another letter to the editor in the future.

this one loves bringing negative news and controversy.....

look at her history of reporting at VP (it's all there for anyone objective)

She should be Terminated Post-Haste to save the VP!

JFCOM and HRMFFA

"...said Craig Quigley, who heads the taxpayer-funded Hampton Roads Military and Federal Facilities Alliance, which lobbies to protect the region's military assets....."

WHAT???? A taxpayer funded lobbyist group who lobbys for the continuance of over inflated military infrastructure that pays no taxes thereby increasing the tax burdens on the (approximately 50% of the remaining land here) remainder of property owners both commercial and residential. Seems par for the course for our corrupt system.

Good riddance

Well it is about time. JFCOM is a waste of taxpayers money. You should see the amount of money they spend that sits in the warehouse untouched, millions of dollars gone to waste. Like one person commented before, most of the people there get pensions, aside from the top pay they get for doing nothing. It's all in who you know if you get a job there and if you're a retiring officer, you really get paid to do absolutely nothing. I'm just sorry for the contractors losing their jobs who put in actual physical hard work for the low pay. So I say good riddance. Maybe the money saved from this cut can be put to use elsewhere, where it is needed. Hopefully.

The great Whiners and hypocrites

The great Whiners and hypocrites of our society, you know the crowd that voted for Bush and the President who sent our country into the worst economic calamity in decades are still throwing the word socialist around like Bush spent money. These same ditto heads are showing just how ignorant they are. Well if there version of "Socialist" is scaling down a pig sized, bloated military during a economic crisis, then I guess I can say that I'm proud to be a socialist.

Actually, most of us blame the collapse on the "Dem" Congress

The "Dems" who controlled both houses in Congress, including Pelosi, Reed, and Barney Frank (head of finance committee) who all approved and encouraged those actions that led to the ultimate collapse of Fanny Mae Freddy Mac mortgage giveaways, lead us to financial ruin and the financial chaos that followed- just what the Dems want in order to have their way (socialized everything}. Then to top that, hired Goldman and Sachs croonies to disperse Trillions of our tax dollars to God knows who (we all know what they got away with on the whole scheme) Yea, just blame it on Bush- all happened under his radar while fighting our multi-faceted war against the Islamic Jihad Muslims living here and abroad. Change, yes we got change- Haa.

Cycles

Everyone older than 30 knows that military budgets wax and wane over time. We have been on a military spending expansion for a long time now, so it is only reasonable that now we will start contracting for a while. This doesn't make anyone a "communist" or imperil the safety of our nation.

Besides, if we didn't have so many troops and ships and planes, then maybe the politicians wouldn't get so tempted to throw them all over the world into situations without end or purpose. I'm sure many military people, both troops and their families, would prefer that the military be used only as a last resort and not quite so freely as they have been this past decade.

Hehe

These comments are great. Thanks to all for the entertainment :)

Spending Cuts: Thank You

We voted to cut federal spending so we got what we asked for. Stop the whine... We got exactly what we asked for.

IMO: Lets cut some more, move a carrier to Florida and retire the USS Enterprise saving us even more dollars!

Oh, please stop!

This forum is a great example of the polarization of this country as a whole. The minute someone does something THAT HAS TO BE DONE, people start howling from their special interest viewpoint. Eventually it denigrates into a hyperbolic shouting match of "Obama the socialist," "Bush started it," and the ever cherished "the military is unnecessary."

Grow up people; our government is bloated and cuts have to be made. I don't like Obama's political beliefs, but his approval and Gates' recommendation is correct in this matter.

We have to stop this childish bickering, accept the pain of doing more with less and move on to the next challenge...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: JFCOM rss feed    Military rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features