The Virginian-Pilot
©
SUFFOLK
Charles Duck opened the door of his White Marsh Road home on Wednesday, supporting himself with crutches.
A week ago today, he'd just come home from the hospital. Shortly before 3 a.m., police said, Duck saw a man trying to load a dog box from Duck's lawn into a pickup.
Duck got his gun, went to the window, and yelled at the man to move to the front of his vehicle. Instead, he jumped into the passenger side of his pickup, and Duck, a retired Suffolk police officer, started shooting, police said.
"I just got out of surgery the day before this happened," Duck said Wednesday, adding that he suffers from poor blood circulation. He pointed to a scar that runs the length of the inside of his left arm.
The man, whom police identified as 20-year-old Quamaine L. Lassiter, showed up at Sentara Obici Hospital at 3 a.m. saying he had been shot by someone in a passing vehicle as he was walking on Lake Kennedy Drive. Police later found the pickup on Oak Street.
Lassiter had a minor bullet wound in the head, and he was later taken to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital and was released.
Duck had been a city cop for 20 years when he retired in 2005, and the former police chief described him as someone with a gift for sizing up criminal activity. Now, his former colleagues are investigating him. No charges have been filed against Duck or Lassiter.
Several law professors contacted this week say the law could allow for Duck to be prosecuted. "In Virginia, you do not have the right to use deadly force to merely protect property or to evict that trespasser," said Darryl Brown, a professor at the University of Virginia Law School.
Duck declined to talk about what happened.
"My house, my property," he said.
The brick home sits on an unfenced yard with an open field on one side and a home on the other.
William Freeman, Suffolk's former police chief who retired in 2008, said Duck was a good officer who had worked in patrol and in the special investigations unit. Freeman worked with Duck in the unit, doing drug investigations and anything uniform patrol didn't have time to do. That was in the 1990s.
"Duck had an uncanny ability to be able to evaluate what he saw and make a decision as to whether it was involving some kind of criminal activity," Freeman said.
Freeman said he couldn't pass judgment on what happened the night Duck faced the intruder on his property.
"I'm not privy to all of the information," he said. "That's why we have to rely on those institutions that are there to evaluate all of the factual information."
Suffolk's spokeswoman did not comment further about the investigation Wednesday.
This case is similar to one from 2009, when a store owner shot and killed a burglar who had broken into his store, J&L Food Mart in Whaleyville.
Commonwealth's Attorney Phil Ferguson declined to prosecute the store's owner, James H. Durden Jr., saying the store owner believed his life was in danger.
Associate Professor David Velloney, who teaches at Regent University Law School in Virginia Beach, said a person may protect property through other means that aren't life-threatening.
"If someone is stealing my prized lawn mower or stealing something off of my property, I can run out there and pull them back and push them down," he said. "I can't exercise my right to kill someone just because they're taking my things," Velloney said.
Veronica Gonzalez, (757) 222-5208, veronica.gonzalez@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Shooting on Personal Property
This case depends on only factor: race. A guy in TX did the EXACT same thing and was charged with attempted murder because institutional racism is baked into the corrupted criminal system. That guy sitting in jail in TX is a person of color, but this shooting will be determined to be OK because prosecutors follow the exact pattern. Expect no charges.
i can just hear some of you
I can just hear some of you say, "I have a gun, don't come on my property because I will shoot to kill". "I'm a macho man, and don't your forget it". YIKES!!!!
Crime pays
From experience I know that the surest way to make sure criminals can steal your stuff and get away with it is to NOT take action, and call the police. I confronted 2 thugs outside my house stealing radios from the neighbors cars, and after several threatening comments, by them, and myself ignoring said comments knowing I had a loaded 9mm, they left. I then called 911 and reported the incident. I was told that they were probably long gone and NO police ever responded. My brother recently had a truck driver call him to say that he had bought items stolen from his house with a description of the vehicle and the theives(he had placed an ad on craigslist describing the items). They lived next to my brother in Suffolk. No action has been taken.
Send him to jail !!!
The very reason the legal systems exists is to prevent situations like this. Here is a retired cop, who knows this. A person cannot take any situation in to their own hands by force, so yeah the guy was wrong for stealing whatever he stole. But by this man who is no longer a police officer shooting at this man he not only put himself, the robber, his neighbor and their kids in harm's way. But keep in mind the fact that he used to be a police officer he knew that he was breaking that law by opening fire. Ima tell you what the judge told me. He should've called the police. That is what they are for. It's unfortunate but he needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent
Send him to jail !!!
The very reason the legal systems exists is to prevent situations like this. Here is a retired cop, who knows this. A person cannot take any situation in to their own hands by force, so yeah the guy was wrong for stealing whatever he stole. But by this man who is no longer a police officer shooting at this man he not only put himself, the robber, his neighbor and their kids in harm's way. But keep in mind the fact that he used to be a police officer he knew that he was breaking that law by opening fire. Ima tell you what the judge told me. He should've called the police. That is what they are for. It's unfortunate but he needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent
"... he'd just come home from the hospital. "
Lacking pertinent details may I suggest the possibility that he may have been acting in a diminished capacity and may not be responsible for the consequences of his actions. The vic/perp is not responsible because he had a poor upbringing. Let's just call it even and carry on.
common sense
Not being able to protect your LIFE,property,and the life and property of others around you with a gun is utter nonsense because sometimes a gun is necessary especially when the criminal may posses one.
would you let someone enter your property, pose a potential danger to you and your family, and get away before you can even get a hold of the police who would most likely use a gun anyway, and how would you feel if someone could sue you because they broke their foot on your front door when trying to rob your house.
that's the direction Virginia law is heading.
its sad when a law biding citizen has to deal with more garbage than a criminal.
common sense is disappearing from the justice system.
VA direction
I can’t find any state that allows a private citizen to shoot at someone from stealing property and I don’t want to be the first. I’m sure you will feel free to correct me if I’m wrong. Neither the castle doctrine people are mentioning nor stand-your-ground would protect Duck although I wish we would pass those to take the ambiguity out of the situations they do cover.
I agree BUT....
I submitted a post very similar to this yesterday and for some reason The VP decided that it was promoting violence and deleted the comment. I hope they keep your post up for all to see and realize exactly what their story is saying. Facts are Facts and you have pointed them out perfectly!! Well said!!
Come into my house, meet my family
Smith, Wesson and Glock and they all bark...be in my house at night, they all bite, bye bye bad guy. Would not hesitate one moment to kill and intruder.