The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
The executive director of the Norfolk Community Services Board will be paid a $21,700 bonus to her $115,000 salary. The salary boost follows a $15,000 bonus she received last year, a report released Tuesday showed.
The move puts Maureen Womack in an exclusive group: The city did not give any department heads a pay raise or bonus this fiscal year unless they were assigned as an acting assistant city manager, according to Nancy Olivo, Norfolk's director of human resources.
Womack's agency came under scrutiny last year after it was learned that the CSB paid a suspended administrative worker for 12 years who faced allegations of having a weapon at work and illegally disclosing medical information about a patient who was HIV-positive. Womack reported the status when she found out, but she is now being sued for defamation by two former workers she forced out over the scandal.
The CSB's board of trustees voted Feb. 8 to give Womack the bonus based on a report by a committee that worked without publicizing its meeting. A meeting of such a committee without public notice is illegal under state law.
Jack Cloud, a deputy in the Norfolk City Attorney's Office who assists the CSB, said he is "taking steps" to ensure the board complies with open meetings law.
That information had been made clear to the CSB on Nov. 9, when an assistant city attorney visited the agency and briefed board members on the Freedom of Information Act and gave them documents explaining it.
Lewis J. Taylor, the board chairman, accepted responsibility, saying he didn't know meetings of specialized committees required public notice. He was one of four CSB board members on the "ad hoc" committee that created the report.
Future meetings will be publicized, he said.
"That was my mistake and we'll correct that," he said.
City Councilman Tommy Smigiel said he was shocked and angry the board flouted the law. "It causes me to have doubt in that organization. I already had some concerns, but that raises more concerns for me," he said.
Taylor said the CSB's board believes Womack is doing "an excellent job managing the CSB over very challenging conditions." The agency provides drug and mental health services to the poor.
No one has explained why Jill McGlone, the 12-year no-show former employee, was neither fired nor put back to work. The CSB paid an estimated $320,000 to McGlone before Womack found out and stopped the payments; McGlone has said she is cooperating with an FBI investigation.
Womack, who has been executive director for two years, fired or forced out five employees in September who she said knew about McGlone's no-show status.
The CSB gets money from the city, state and federal governments. At least one City Council member says the city should study bringing the agency under Norfolk administration. Currently, the council appoints the CSB's board members but exercises little oversight.
A special review conducted by the state following the no-show debacle found "significant deficiencies in internal controls" at the CSB as of September 2010, and recommended about 10 changes. Among problems: Some spending was not transparent, and annual evaluations were not being turned in for every employee, as required by policy.
Randy Sherrod, the auditor, told the Norfolk CSB in January that the problems weren't unusual: "A lot of these are what I find at other CSBs." He said Womack's responses to the state report, if implemented, would meet his requirements and that he plans to check back around July.
Taylor said the problems were long-standing: "Essentially, Maureen inherited these weaknesses from the previous administration."
In an e-mail, Womack said she was "humbled and grateful for the recognition that the Board of Directors felt I deserved."
The last year was difficult, she said.
"We have lived the pain of negative publicity, been the subject of multiple audits, implemented significant regulatory changes and health care reform, faced difficult budget constraints and retooled the service delivery..."
The committee's report also said Womack deserved more money because she is modernizing financial management practices and is not making as much as directors of large, urban community services boards in Virginia, who average $142,691.
The $21,700 bonus is to be paid by March 1 and come from Community Services Board reserve funds, the report said. The agency's annual budget is about $25 million. The reserve fund contains operating expenses for approximately three months, Taylor said.
Because of potential budget cuts, it's unknown if CSB employees will get raises this year.
Pilot writer Harry Minium contributed to this report.
Patrick Wilson, (757) 222-3893, patrick.wilson@pilotonline.com
Norfolk Community Services Board Report
Review of Norfolk CSB by Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Surprise (NOT)
This is norfolk, they have plenty of money.
Undeserved bonus
Womack does not deserve one cent. She has (and had) loyal and dedicated staff, but if you cross her, you are ousted. Norfolk CSB staff deserve a cost of living raise for their work. Media should ask what Norfolk CSB's vacancy rate is. You will find it is the highest in the organization's history. Ask how much is spent on going to the "Hill" and with national organizational dues and conferences. Womack has a narcissistic personality and no regard or respect for others.
illegal meetings and dishonesty
Womack did not discover no-show worker, employees reported it to her. Where are the minutes to public board meetings? Womack is the only employee to attend board of directors meeting, so whatever she feeds them,they hear. she is dishonest and twists facts only to make her look good, and she is very wrong. She never listens to what staff have to offer, suggest, its her way or the highway, I should know. If you look at previous NCSB audits, you find that internal controls and other practices were conducted appropriately. Of course the no show worker was well hidden in the personnel/financial aspect. I think all CSB's are guilty of not being 100% compliant in conducting annual performance evals. Investigate Womack!
Chutzpah personified
In case anyone missed it, the person who got paid for not working has applied for Unemployment benefits! (I understand she was turned down, but really!)
with budget restraints, she just started this job, and ...
nobody else got a raise, she should not have gotten one either, period!! Federal dollars are being cut everywhere and that money should have stayed in place for a worthy cause!!
how many other meetings were held in secret?
Hold them accountable!! They are in a position to know better!! Ignorance of the law, is indeed, no excuse!!
Now, let me get this straight....
According to the Ad Hoc committee recommendation,Ms. Wommack, currently paid $115K,will be eligible for a cost of living, along with other eligible CSB employees. Fair enough. BUT, being given a bonus of 21K FROM CSB RESERVE REVENUE FUNDS, is absolutely wrong on so many levels. First, that is the organization's "rainy day" fund...once gone it will not be replaced. And they decided a bonus was its best use? Are you kidding me? Second, Don't they know funding for services for all non profits is being cut from Fed./State/ and local budgets so how will this money be replaced? Third, after "training" on having "secret" meetings, this ad hoc committee met in secret and decided this "reward". 2011 OMG moments look like they will top 2010's.
This sickens me
How can there be $150,000+ in government money for someone like this, but once again more teachers' jobs are in jeopardy? The United States is already behind China, Japan, India in educating our children. Where will we be in 20 years?
I wish it was just them
We are 29th in the world in math and science. I’m 99% sure we were 1st just a few years ago.
"Jack Cloud, a deputy in the
"Jack Cloud, a deputy in the Norfolk City Attorney's Office who assists the CSB, said he is "taking steps" to ensure the board complies with open meetings law."
So Jack... will the board be prosecuted for violating the law or will they be given a pass and a smack on the hand? After all, ignorance of the law is no excuse right?
This whole thing has the looks of a payoff. Something stinks in the garden about this.