68°
forecast

Inmate from Virginia Beach argues life term is unconstitutional

Posted to: Crime News Virginia Beach

VIRGINIA BEACH

Darrell Perry is supposed to die in prison for a gunpoint rape and robbery he committed more than two decades ago at age 17.

But the eighth-grade dropout, who already has spent more than half his life behind bars, says keeping him there for the rest of it would be unconstitutional.

Perry, 40, makes his case on a five-page form he sent to the court that put him away, hand-writing his answers on the blank lines provided. He cites the U.S. Supreme Court and the Eighth Amendment, and he closes his argument with a newspaper story he has circled and underlined.

It is one petition among the countless filed by inmates who claim to be victims of an unjust system. But, legal experts say, Perry is right.

The Supreme Court ruled nine months ago that juveniles who do not kill cannot be put away for life without the possibility of parole. The case stemmed from a Florida boy who claimed that a life sentence for armed burglary at 16 violated the Eighth Amendment's protection from cruel and unusual punishment.

The court cited 129 such cases in the United States, which the justices said is the only country in the world to send juveniles who do not kill away for life.

The Sentencing Project, a Washington-based nonprofit that opposes life sentences under such circumstances, says the number of known cases is growing.

Thirty-seven states plus the federal government have laws to permit it, but so-called nonhomicide juvenile lifers are imprisoned in a fraction of those. More than half are locked up in Florida.

Eight are in Virginia. The rest are scattered among nine other states.

Perry's name is on The Sentencing Project's unofficial list of prisoners likely eligible for resentencing, said Ashley Nellis, a research analyst with the organization. The group has attempted to track data for years but some states either didn't keep figures or wouldn't provide them, she said.

Perry declined an interview request from Nottoway Correctional Center, where he is an inmate. He indicates in the heavy, slanted print of his petition that he intends to represent himself.

"My lawyer won't respond back to my legal letter," he writes.

Perry keeps his argument brief: "By a 5-4 vote, the young people serving life must have 'a meaningful opportunity to obtain release,' if they 'haven't killed.' Even Justice Anthony Kennedy agree that my detention goes against the Eighth Amendment."

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that some juvenile nonhomicide crimes are heinous enough to warrant life without parole.

In the early morning hours of Nov. 15, 1988, Perry and two other teens targeted a woman in the parking lot of a Virginia Beach apartment complex, according to court records.

Perry admitted to pointing a handgun at her as she got out of her car. One of the others forced the woman into the back seat. Perry drove the car into an alley, where each of the teens raped her. Then they went to Suffolk, where they tied up the woman and fled, according to Perry's statement to police.

Perry was a learning-disabled teen with a dysfunctional family life, according to court records that include a police confession and an evaluation by a licensed counselor in 1989. He dropped out of school after nine tumultuous years, but by 17 had a job at a Norfolk furniture store.

The teen also associated with a notorious gang called the Pepsi Boys, whose leader was accused in multiple murders, rapes, robberies and abductions. The gang leader got a life term plus 403 years for his crimes.

In 1990, a Virginia Beach judge sentenced Perry to two life terms plus 77 years for rape, abduction, robbery, forcible sodomy and use of a firearm in a felony.

It's up to the attorney general to decide what comes next. The office has 60 days from the time it receives Perry's petition to respond.

Perry might not fare any better if his case goes back before a judge.

Some challengers have wound up with a new sentence that, while not a life term, will keep them locked up until death, Nellis said.

Kristin Davis, (757) 222-5131, kristin.davis@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

He was not sentenced to life without parole!

This fine individual was sentenced to 2 life terms plus 77 years, not life without parole! That means if he could keep himself alive until he is about 254 years old, he would be a free man!

Tea Party BS is spreading

Hilarious...this guy and many others out there thinking they can get ouf paying for their crimes by saying its "unconstituional"....Id like to get ahold of this young adult....It seems like everthing is "unconstitutional" now days. Pretty soon folks will be saying its 'unconstitutional" that I have to work for a living. Give me a break!

Being put away for life is

Being put away for life is cruel and unusual? What about the rape he committed? That's not cruel and unusual? His sentence is unconstituional? What about his victim's rights? Were their rights honored when he committed his crime? OMG...seriously? His "cruel and unusual" is actually punishment for a crime he committed. What did his victim do that deserved the punishment of being raped and tormented? Are you kidding me? Lock him up and throw away the key. His victim's life has never been and never will be the same...neither should his. Unbelievable!!!

Give him a chance for

Give him a chance for parole.....with a big custom made "DENIED" stamp permantly affixed to each page at each hearing.

Emotions

When reading most of everyone's comments it seems as if everyone's emotions are clouding their judgment about the LAW. The eight amendment is about cruel and unusual punishment, not about letting people rot or that inmates are lucky to even be fed three meals a day. You have to look at this as a clear violation of the law. Even if the judge overturn the sentences, which he has the ability to keep the same, Perry would still be serving over 40 years in prison. Perry is not denying that he committed the crime, he is simply stating that his punishment was wrong for a juvenile. Although I think he should stay in prison and continue is sentence, the question is whether his sentence violates the eighth amendment or not and what would be the proper sentence

Many Unproper Sentences in Virginia

There are numerous improper sentences in Virginia. There are non-violent offenders serving more than half of the time that this kid will. Someone needs to oversee what the jusdgges are doing in this state, becuase they definately do not aplly the laws in the manner that Congress intended. 15 years for a non-violent crime, should be criminal.
No wonder our youth has no hope for the future, and no respect for law enforcement. If they would abide by the laws they expect us to follow, it would be different. It's two different worlds, us and them. They don't have to play by the rules, or serve the rediculous sentences for breaking the same laws!

ok

Ok fine, Death Sentence!!

He doesnt want to rot in jail let him die early!

slime ball

they should have executed this slime ball 20 years ago we have been footing the bill to house this slime ball what a waste of money tell the lawyers to ask the victim how she felt

Oh what a difference a few months make.

Adolescents are prone to recklessness and risk-taking behaviors, which can lead to substance abuse, car accidents, unsafe sex, and youth crime. There is evidence that this risk-taking is biologically driven, caused by the social and emotional part of the brain (amygdala) developing faster than the cognitive-control part of the brain (frontal cortex). It’s why we don’t let them drink before 21 but let them fight for their country at 18. Between 14-17 a person develops the intellectual capacity to think about the complexity of morality. It’s why we become an adult at 18 and even this line is not an absolute. Generally there is a big difference between a 17 and 18 year old. Oh what a difference a few months make.

?

I don't get what the post is supposed to mean? Should we legalize rape, but only if the rapist is 25, wears a condom and says thank you afterwards? Adults are prone to reckless behavior, also. We just call that a mid life crisis!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox