68°
forecast

New regulations on abortion clinics head to McDonnell

Posted to: Health News Politics State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Abortion foes scored a major victory Thursday when Senate Republicans, along with a pair of defecting Democrats, rammed through an amended bill that calls for new regulation of clinics where first-trimester abortions are performed.

It was approved despite protests by Democrats, who hold a slim majority in the chamber. Party leaders tried several tactics over two days to prevent passage of the measure but ultimately failed to block it.

As adopted, the legislation would classify clinics that perform at least five first-trimester abortions per month as hospitals, and it directs the state Board of Health to prepare regulations for such facilities within 280 days of the law's enactment.

Those who oppose abortions insist the bill is about ensuring health and safety standards at such medical facilities.

"This is a historic vote," Virginia Family Foundation President Victoria Cobb declared moments after the Senate narrowly adopted the amended bill.

Cobb, noting that supporters have lobbied for the change for years, called the Senate action "a huge step forward" to impose rules on clinics that create an "appropriate environment for women" seeking abortions.

It's a view shared by Gov. Bob McDonnell, who said he intends to sign the bill. He told reporters Thursday he believes "all outpatient surgical hospitals or clinics should be regulated in the same way, and I think this bill will do that."

Abortion-rights advocates argue that the health and safety argument is meant to divert attention from what they deem a back-door maneuver to restrict abortions through previously rejected regulatory changes.

It is unfair, they say, to hold abortion clinics to higher standards than similar medical facilities that offer dental and cosmetic surgery.

Officials already are exploring a legal challenge, fearful that the cost of complying with more stringent rules could drive 17 of the state's 21 abortion clinics out of business.

"This is a sly, underhanded way of passing legislation that circumvented the committee process," said Jessica Honke of Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia.

Erin Zabel, director of public relations for Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia, said she did not yet know what impact the proposed regulations would have on abortion services provided at the Planned Parenthood office in Virginia Beach. She said it's likely there will be a legal challenge to the regulations.

"It will probably be tied up in litigation for a while," Zabel said. "But the bottom line is, these regulations have nothing to do with the safety of first-trimester abortions, which have one of the lowest complication rates of any surgical procedure."

Bills to tighten clinic regulations have cleared the House of Delegates in the past, only to be rejected in the Senate.

In recent years, Democrats stacked the 15-member Senate Education and Health Committee, which weighs abortion bills, with 10 members of their party, a large enough majority to doom such proposals.

That panel rejected numerous abortion-control bills this year, but not the bill that was the source of much debate Thursday because it didn't initially target abortion.

The original version called on the state Board of Health to develop infection-prevention policies and regulations for disaster preparation and security at hospitals and nursing homes.

Del. Kathy Byron, R-Campbell County, modified it in the House of Delegates on Monday. Her amendments were upheld after strenuous debate on the Senate floor when Republican Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling broke a 20-20 deadlock in the chamber.

All 18 Republicans voted in favor of the changes. They were joined by two Democratic senators, Charles Colgan of Prince William County and Phillip Puckett of Russell County, who each said he voted on principle.

Other Democrats had divergent views.

Arlington County Sen. Mary Margaret Whipple labeled the measure a "purely discriminatory" vehicle that would restrict access to safe abortions.

"It makes me heartsick," she said.

"If anybody in this room thinks this debate has been about a woman's health, get a life," roared Senate Majority Leader Richard Saslaw, D-Fairfax.

Republicans, including Virginia Beach Sen. Jeffrey McWaters, insisted that the bill is about proper standards for medical practices.

"I think you have to agree that patient safety is our responsibility," McWaters said during the floor debate.

Pilot writer Elizabeth Simpson contributed to this report.

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Abortion is surgery that can

Abortion is surgery that can go wrong, and has, more often than we know. It certainly mandates more oversight. Even here in VB the operations of owners not licensed, surgeons not board certified -the whole lack of oversight is a concern. See today's http://hamptonroads.com/2011/03/owner-beach-abortion-clinic-had-license-suspended-nj

So much for McDonnell being

So much for McDonnell being the "jobs governor".

Sad

I find it sad that we are comparing terminating a baby's life to a facelift. What have we come to in this country where we hold life in such disregard.

Not quite

This is about applying the same medical protections to ALL invasive procedures, whether abortions, facelifts, orthodontic services, or any procedure that involves going under the skin, so to speak. It's not the end result, it's the procedures that are under discussion.

Oldenough, you do not stand

Oldenough, you do not stand alone.

hmmm

these new standards only apply if a facility is providing more than 5 abortions a month

as most of these clinics spend 90-95% of all their resources on other women's health issue this should not be a problem

so unless a facility if the human variety of a puppy mill then there should be no problem

Income source.

Those who claim that this merely improves the conditions at clinics overlook a couple of points. One, the same conditions should apply at every outpatient surgical facility, including but not limited to plastic surgeons, orthodontists, opthomologists, and yes, tattoo and piercing salons. Skin penetration is skin penetration, wherever it's performed.
Point two, this will result in an increase in back-room abortions performed by people of good intention and limited knowledge, with no, repeat NO sterile facilities at all. Good intentions are great, but human nature is factual!
If this gets signed, and I see no reason why it won't, then I intend to research buying stock in coat-hangar manufacturers, as I anticipate a run in that product.

clueless

I guess you don't follow the news that well. The place in PA could have been shut down if it had inspections. Even nail salons have health inspections. If you are performing a medical procedure then your business needs to be deemed clean and sterile.

hyperbole

Hyperbole does not add any credibility to your argument and it is quickly dismissed.

Coat hangers? Really? Seems that is what you want women to endure anyway. This law protects women. You can't see that because you don't want anything to touch your precious abortion platform. Seems to me you would praise the legislators for thinking of the health and safety of women receiving this procedure. Why wouldn't you want the cleanest and most sterile environment for women? After all, that is what Roe v Wade was all about. Making it legal for women to receive abortions without going to some has-been doctor in some rat infested apartment.

Now it's legal. That won't ever change. The conservatives are just meeting the health demand.

Clarification.

This law will NOT protect women. By making the standards unrealistically high, through such laws as the width of doors, etc, that hospitals are subject to, it will force the outpatient clinics to close. Which is the main plan of anti-choice people. The coat-hangar comment? I am old enough to remember when that was the tool of choice for back-alley abortionists. Why wouldn't I want the cleanest and most sterile environment for women? I do. The facilities should be the same in all outpatient surgerie environments. Would you agree?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Health rss feed    News rss feed    Politics rss feed    State Government rss feed   



Toolbox


Partners

Find a HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Doctor or facility name, keyword: i.e., optometrist, dental, home health care
City, State or Zip: i.e., Norfolk, VA or 23510