The Virginian-Pilot
©
CHESAPEAKE
The next generation of offshore wind energy systems may be developed just minutes from Greenbrier Mall.
A team of about 50 engineers in a building off Volvo Parkway is working on two prototypes for wind turbines that would be the heart of offshore windmills that soon may sprout off the coast of Virginia.
Executives from Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding-Newport News and Gamesa Technology Corp., a U.S. subsidiary of a Spanish wind-energy company, were joined Thursday by Gov. Bob McDonnell,
Chesapeake Mayor Alan Krasnoff, and wind-industry officials to mark the opening of the Offshore Wind Technology Center.
"It really is a tremendous vision," McDonnell told a group of more than 100 gathered at Gamesa's new 25,000-square-foot facility in Liberty Executive Park. "This'll be the first prototype ever built in the United States for an offshore wind platform. It holds tremendous potential for jobs, for economic development, here in the future."
Gamesa, one of the world's leading manufacturers of wind turbines, had yet to enter the offshore-wind market, in part because of the obstacles posed by putting wind turbines in an ocean setting.
"In the wind-energy sector, offshore is the technological challenge today that everyone is trying to crack," said Jose Antonio Malumbres, Gamesa's chief technology officer.
The company saw working with Northrop's Newport News shipyard - the only builder of U.S. aircraft carriers and one of two builders of nuclear submarines - as a way of developing a reliable, sea-based wind turbine.
"Our partnership with Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding will help us resolve all of the challenges related to a marine environment, bringing to the table the best solutions from 125 years of experience in the sea," Malumbres said.
The Chesapeake operation is Gamesa's first offshore research-and-development office worldwide, he added.
The development team, a mix of engineers from Northrop Grumman, Gamesa and additional hires, has been at work for a couple of months, designing two units planned for installation by the fourth quarter of 2012, said David Rosenberg, a Gamesa spokesman.
The project, which is still hiring, is expected to employ about 80 engineers by the end of the year, Northrop and Gamesa officials said.
Last fall, the companies announced a deal to work together on the U.S. launch of a prototype for an offshore wind turbine being developed by Gamesa.
Plans call for one of the two units under development in Chesapeake to be installed on land, the other offshore, though specific sites have not yet been identified.
Gamesa plans to bring its first offshore product to market in 2013, Malumbres said.
In 2005, the company set up two manufacturing facilities in Pennsylvania to make blades and power-generating units for land-based wind turbines. It is expected to employ about 1,000 people in its North American work force by the end of this month.
The offshore wind turbine being developed in Chesapeake will generate 5 megawatts of electricity, enough to power more than 800 homes a year, Malumbres said.
Thursday's ribbon-cutting came three days after Obama administration officials announced in Norfolk that the federal government could begin leasing sites off the coasts of Virginia and three other states for wind energy development by the end of the year.
Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar also announced that the federal government would spend $50.5 million over the next five years to fund research and development to support offshore wind energy.
Robert McCabe, (757) 446-2327, robert.mccabe@pilotonline.co

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
dirty business
The reason we are partnering with overseas technology is for having been sold out by our lobbyist form of government that steered us down a dead end. America saw a need for energy policy change over 40 years ago, but oil and coal's short road to riches along with an entrenched congress always puts a squelch on it.
For the nay-sayers on wind and other renewables it bears repeating, nothing ventured nothing gained. These steps that are in the right direction (first off, a greener planet) lead to streamlined processes of brighter and more affordable ideas. A learning curve if you will.
America should have long ago been the leader in green tech and would be selling it to the world, but instead we will playing catchup with other countries.
You can
fly an airplane with just wind. It`s called a glider. Lovely and clean as it may be, it is not commercially viable. The "green" industry is not averse to lobbying, nor am I suggesting they should be. I am CAUTIOUS on the short-term prospects for renewables. Spain for example was going to build a "green" economy. For their trouble they are bankrupt and have over 20% unemployment. The promised "green" jobs never materialized. I am not HOSTILE to "green" initiatives, but metaphorically from Mizzurah. SHOW ME.
A different point of view
I have been reading investment research that says we have 2X Saudi oil and oil eqivalent in the USA. We are the Saudi Arabia of coal (coal gasification) and the Saudis of agriculture (bio-diesel). The status quo modified could go on for a very long time. By the way, everyone likes to complain of gas prices (over $3 in at least a real estate DEPRESSION) orange juice is $8 a gallon. I try to keep an open mind on most things (2+2=4 thousands of years after the Pyramids were built) but wind has a long way to go to convince me of its viability. Now if you`ll excuse me I have to fire up my 200mph yet 21mpg chariot.
The Ford Plant
If this is truly a growth industry; it would be wonderful if somehow the old Ford plant could have been utilized, especially with it accessibility to the waterway. The new plant owner is proposing to build solar panels on just a small percentage of the property.
Don't make sense
Putting a generator of electricity 20 miles off the coast and running a big extension cord back here has to involve one heck of a transmission loss, unless the Governor has also suspended ohms law. Is this going to be a overhead extension cord, with big steel towers every couple of hundred feet?
This is extremely old technology
California has had wind turbines south of Sacramento and Travis AFB decades ago. They must have long ago figured out how to factor in Ohm's law into the creation of all of our land-based electrical transmission lines and power grids that have crisscrossed America for over a century. Big costs are always involved in putting high voltage grids underground or, in this case, under water. Nuclear would be more cost effective in the near term and America needs to accept that and move forward as did France.
what a joke
what a joke
wind energy is just one part
wind energy is just one part of the equation. It is an economy of scale. The more we do the cheaper it gets. The naysayers only are interested in burning more stuff. That clearly won't work forever.
Ah Greenbrier!
New small business opportunities, more jobs, better pay, 3 mile commutes, goodbye intercity highways.
Ironic and smiles
The funny and ironic thing is that Gamesa Technology Corp is an OFFSHORE company locating HERE to work on OFFSHORE wind farms.
Good job Governor McDonnell getting a FOREIGN company to come here. Maybe we can make such a business environment to attract more OFFSHORE companies.
Chesapeake is getting jobs and with this plant will come the support economy added.
Wind turbine technology is not perfect but that is irrelevant because in America we can do more than one thing at a time.
Now us marine welders can keep on welding.