The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
A union official threatened to withhold volunteer and financial support in the fall elections in an e-mail to Democratic lawmakers, a message some conservatives are calling inappropriate and worthy of investigation.
The message was purportedly sent Feb. 3 by Carol Summerlyn, a Communications Workers of America representative from Portsmouth. Summerlyn did not respond to e-mails and a phone message seeking comment Saturday.
In the memo, she said the union had concerns about proposed legislation that, among other things, would give certain telephone companies the option not to provide new land line service in areas of Virginia where wireless coverage is available.
House and Senate versions of the legislation have passed.
Summerlyn chided Democrats who she said "abandoned" the union by voting alongside Republicans to advance the House version, HB2367 sponsored by Fairfax County Republican Del. Tim Hugo, out of committee.
And she suggested that betrayal could have consequences.
"CWA's active participation in this fall's election is being threatened by Democrats who are abandoning their base to align themselves with big business at the expense of consumers," the e-mail reads.
"It will be difficult to convince my members to give up their Saturdays and evenings to elect the very people who ignore our needs after the election is over," it continues. "It will be nearly impossible for me to convince my boss to authorize the thousands of dollars we normally contribute to the party and individual candidates."
That language in the e-mail "raises some serious questions," said Ben Marchi, state director of Americans for Prosperity, a conservative group that opposes federal efforts to make it easier for workers to unionize.
"Threatening legislators by promising to withhold campaign cash if they don't vote the way union bosses tell them ... is a clear violation of the public trust," added Marchi, who has filed a state open records request for e-mails from CWA officials to Democratic lawmakers.
Summerlyn's message was forwarded Feb. 4 to several Northern Virginia legislators by another union official, according to a copy obtained by The Virginian-Pilot.
Its contents were part of a recent floor debate between Hugo and House Minority Leader Ward Armstrong, D-Henry County, who voted against the telecomm bill.
Armstrong said Saturday that he wasn't a recipient but has seen a copy of the e-mail, which he called "inappropriate." "They've got no business putting that in writing or saying it," he said.
The sometimes ugly convergence of money and politics helps make a strong case for public financing of political campaigns, he added.
Senate Majority Leader Richard Saslaw, a Democrat from Fairfax County, was a recipient of the e-mail. He sponsored the Senate version of the telecomm bill, which he said was amended to make some concessions for CWA concerns.
As for the e-mail, he said it didn't faze him.
"I didn't pay that much attention to it," said Saslaw, adding that he's received "a zillion letters like that" from all sorts of interests during his long tenure in the legislature. "Maybe you could say I've been there so long I've got a thick skin."
Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Why is this an issue...
much less news? This happens all the time with the special interests and the politicians they deal with. Unions sold their collective soul years ago to the Democrats, again, there's no news in that. The essence of political contributions are to establish an investment in those politicians who can advance the special interest's agenda or desires, be they financial or otherwise. People want a return on their investment(s). That's what our system has degenerated to, but it's been this way forever now.
This is a non story
Any group union or not has the right to donate time and money to political candidates. Of course you would support those that support your group.
So why is it a shock if this union tells candidates they wont fund them if they dont represent their views.
I am no big union fan but this is a bunch of hot air.
THIS IS RIDICULOUS
The only difference between the Communication Workers of America and the Americans for Prosperity in reference to influencing legislators' votes is the method of influence. In this case the CWA chose to publicize their concerns, whereas the AP choose to perform their influence in a more covert manner, similar to most other faux conservative organizations.
Until this type of influence peddling and "behind the scenes" payola schemes are forbidden, there will still be a "for sale" sign permanently anchored at the foot of the steps of the statehouse.
Good for Her!!!
Why do you think unions or any organization that has an endorsement process recommends and donates to candidates? They want their support on THEIR issues. Duh!
That's why the T-Party formed.
Do the Pro-Life folks give $$ to the Pro-Choice advocates? No. Do gun control advocates waste their PAC $$ on politicians who year after year support pro-gun iniatives?
As a teacher I stopped giving to my PAC...their continual support of candidates who used education only as a campaign slogan and seldom/never voted for our issues was a waste of hard-earned money. I worked for Obama...but his education reform is ill-advised...I won't again. Bob McD never voted for teachers? Did I work/vote/contribute? Heck no! And never will. That's politics 101!
Taking the money is a violation of the public trust.
Unions have rationalized that it is necessary to play the game the same way the corporations do. Lawyers and lobbyists. The rank and file is punked both ways.
Did you really think that you could abandon the real power of unions for the apparent easy path of paying for representation. Problem is you don't have enough money.
The Union is well within its rights
Too often, campaign cash goes to whoever the lobbyists think will win, not to who best represents the views of the donors. This is one of the worst things about current politics, the whole notion of 'money as speech' becomes a farce when political donations become betting on a horse race rather than advocating a political position. Our money should follow our principles.
In this case, the effort is futile, much like the Buggywhip Union opposing motorcars, but so long as the donations are fully disclosed, the Union is well within its rights, and would be failing its members if it did otherwise.
Good Work by Communication Workers!
I'm glad they CWA rep is doing her job. When politicians are beholden to big business interests it takes worker's organizations to represent the rest of us. Anti-labor and pro business legislation we are seeing in Richmond demand a response. Dems should not take union support for granted.
Unionism
They usually are born of unfairness by employers and are useful in bringing self-respect for workers as well as resolution of Worker's Rights disputes however, stifling business and development changes are not strictly worker causes. Admittedly, changes may result in fewer workers but to oppose them in the name of union clout is a poor reason for rejection. The nation turned for increased profits, to off-shore labor pools,less regulation and invisible environment standards. These choices have decimated American employment and strengthened the financial collapse as the bubble of euphoric credit burst and the weakness of profiteering-led business activity exposed Americans to low wage service industry-employment.
What could possibly be wrong with any organization or group...
telling their elected officials that because of their support or nonsupport of legislation which the group opposes or supports that they are going to withold campaign contributions to those candidates in future elections? Especially when the politicians stand with their hands out at election time and then turn their backs on the groups after they are elected.
Would the U.S. Chamber of Commerce support a candidate who supports the Employee Free Choice Act? Of course not, they want low wages, and you can bet that they let the candidates know how they better vote if they want campaign money from the Chamber.
Also, how are labor representatives big union bosses when only 4% of Virginias workforce is unionized?
This is News?
I have to laugh... I have told many an elected official: "no cash, no support and no future votes" when we didn't agree on an issue. You, we and they have no obligation to support folks who do not support the issues from the view point of the viewer. Is that news? No. Voters all across America withold political donations, change candidates and threaten to withdraw volunteer support in every election in this country. Its POLITICS... LOL
This is nothing more than somebody's spin to discredit the union or the person who wrote the email. No big deal so get over it! LOL