The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
In what appeared to be a compromise verdict, a federal jury Friday found two former Blackwater contractors guilty of one manslaughter count but acquitted the pair of all other charges in the shootings of three Afghans.
Christopher Drotleff of Virginia Beach was already weeping as the clerk read "not guilty" over and over again to charges of murder, assault and weapons offenses. Co-defendant Justin Cannon stood nearby stoically.
The jury in U.S. District Court found Drotleff and Cannon guilty of involuntary manslaughter for the shooting death of a passenger in a car they fired on at a Kabul intersection on May 5, 2009.
Jurors found them not guilty of murder or manslaughter for the shooting death of a pedestrian, who happened to be walking a dog nearby that night. They also acquitted both of assault for wounding the driver of the car, a decision that Cannon's attorney, James Broccoletti, called "puzzling," because they found wrongdoing for shooting the passenger but no wrongdoing for wounding the driver.
But Cannon and Drotleff were happy when it was over, the lawyers said.
Cannon was looking at a mandatory life prison sentence if the jury had found him guilty of using an AK-47 machine gun that night. Drotleff didn't face that much time because he had a handgun, but would have faced decades behind bars. The jury acquitted them of all weapons charges.
Involuntary manslaughter carries a maximum penalty of eight years in prison, but under federal sentencing rules Drotleff and Cannon are likely facing one to two years in prison, or even time already served, their lawyers said.
Drotleff, Cannon and their families declined comment after the verdict, citing the ongoing case. Sentencing was set for June 14.
"I just want to go home," was all Cannon would say as he walked out of court with his father. Cannon is from Corpus Christi, Texas, but has been living in Louisiana with his parents.
Drotleff, who lives in Virginia Beach with his wife and children, was allowed out on bond after the verdict, the first time he has been free since early January 2009. Cannon already was out on bond.
The two Blackwater firearms instructors say they fired their guns in self-defense that night as they were helping co-workers who had just crashed at a busy intersection. Drotleff and Cannon said they feared a sedan that had driven at them down the wrong side of the road could have been a suicide bomber.
Cannon told authorities that he had seen a sedan just like it minutes earlier carrying men with guns. The car rammed their lead convoy vehicle, causing it to crash.
Prosecutors alleged that the two made up that story to cover themselves for firing recklessly, from behind, at the Afghans. The driver testified that he was heading home from dinner with his cousin, who was killed. They were unarmed.
Drotleff's attorney, Lawrence H. Woodward Jr., said his client was happy to be finally going home.
"He's delighted to be reunited with his wife and children," Woodward said. "We're going to continue to work to make sure all the charges are cleared from his name."
Woodward and Broccoletti said they plan to file motions to throw out the one conviction.
"It's difficult to fathom," Broccoletti said of the verdict. "I think it's a compromise."
Jurors - 10 women and two men - spent nearly 20 hours over three days deliberating. At times, shouting could be heard inside the jury room, and just before they emerged with their decision, there was clapping in the room.
"The jurors recognized that there was a significant degree of self-defense involved," Broccoletti said.
"All in all, it's a good day for these guys."
Federal prosecutors declined to comment afterward. A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office also declined to comment.
Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343, tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Hope it gets thrown out completely
I'm glad they're getting off on most of the charges but I hope the conviction gets thrown out as well. I know Justin and I don't believe him to be the kind of person to use poor judgment in a situation like that. I also totally believe that Blackwater or XE or whoever they are these days, told them to carry those weapons. I know for a fact that sometimes superiors in security contracting/law enforcement/military will tell you to do something without questioning the order or worrying about the consequences only to hang you out to dry when the crap hits the fan because of that order. Esp. an outfit like Blackwater who has already been kicked out of one ongoing conflict. Sounds like damage control to save their contract. Good luck guys.
Security is just one of
the functions they perform. The others include training and that is what these two were engaged in. The comment about them being mercenaries is off base. I really think these types of prosecutions are appeasement driven so the government can maintain their fragile relationships with the foreign country we need cooperation from. And I agree they are not there to save the people of that country, they are there doing a job and collecting a paycheck just like we all do every day.
And you know all the facts
Mercenary...actually they were not authorized to carry weapons when they decided to leave their camp without authorization from the superiors....actually after they were told not to. Did you sit in on the case???? Any lets get real not all contractors in afgan carry weapons that is just not true.
Get it right!!!
Wrong 757CC....Wrong! Contractors (yes I am one) are REQUIRED to carry weapons "outside the wire". And it's HERE...not HEAR!
Stating and actually knowing are two different things
Stating you know the details is great but your post is incorrect. "They are there as security for people and places that are vulnerable to attack." These two were firearms instructors plain and simple. They were not there doing security work.
and the pilot still enjoys calling the actions of blackwater
which no longer exists, as a military organization. Why does the pilot do this? This is news, yes, but is it military news, no. It is North Carolina news, regional news, but what these guys have been found guilty of is in no way a part of the military.
Only the pilot, this leftest leaning paper, will try to figure out ways to defame the good and positive work of the military. Stop with this already. We know you hate the military, but at least stress the wrong doings done by military members. Blackwater, or Xe, or what ever they want to call themselves is not a part of the military.
If the pilot cannot figure this out, what else can't they figure out?
Not for us to judge
We weren't there and no one truly knows the circumstances behind what really happened. As everyone is aware there are "innocent people" running around with guns shooting at anything over in these countries. These guys are military vets who went over as contractors, and if they felt their lives were in danger then they probably did what they felt they had to do. If that is not what happend and they shot these people just because, then they have to live with that every day. Let us not forget about the Blackwater contractor who was burned alive by "innocent people". I'm sure that went through this pairs mind when the incident was unfolding.
wait. You don't think this
wait. You don't think this news falls into the military category? Seriously? Wow.
I know the details
they are not fighting the war. They are hired for non combat roles.Training and security are some of those. Mercenaries are paid to fight.
Use of Force
Whether this duo is innocent or guilty isn't for me to say. The issue is the appropriate use of force, and it needs to be kept in that context. Being in a war zone isn't easy (I've been there, done that), but it also doesn't mean one can indiscriminately kill without repercussions. This has been the position of the Afghani government who often seeks answers from the U.S. over this issue, but gets stonewalled time and time again, as if their own citizens lives have no value in relation to that of a American soldier or contractor. I have no doubt this prosecution was politically motivated, but this verdict won't change the rules of engagement on the ground either.