68°
forecast

A pink slip away from homelessness in the Beach

Posted to: Guest Columns Opinion

By Cyrus Williams

 

This is a difficult time for all Americans. Our economy, despite some signs of recovery, continues to suffer, and unemployment, the primary cause of homelessness, hovers around 9 percent. As such, our congressmen and senators have to make difficult decisions about which programs to cut and by how much. While I do not envy their predicament and understand that they have to critically examine all government spending, some budgetary items will cause more harm in the short and long term to the individuals, neighborhoods and communities of Virginia Beach.

With this in mind, I recently led a contingent of students and faculty members from Regent University to Washington, D.C., to lobby for the homeless citizens of Virginia Beach. Our goal was to inform and garner support for the homeless as well as enlighten our representatives on how the proposed 62 percent cuts to the HUD Community Development Block Grants would affect the quality of life of the homeless as well as the individuals, families and neighborhoods of Virginia Beach. These grants provide many services to the homeless and individuals and families who are on the verge of becoming homeless.

We met with the aides of U.S. Rep. Scott Rigell and Sens. Jim Webb and Mark Warner and provided them with specific examples of how the proposed cuts to the block grants would affect our city.

n The 24-week Emergency Winter Shelter program provides shelter to single homeless adults during the coldest months (October through April). The proposed cuts could reduce that by as much as 14 weeks.

n The Lighthouse Center, a day support program for single homeless adults, provides services such as laundry facilities, showers, mail delivery and case management to approximately 475 different individuals annually. The cuts could significantly reduce the staff and hours.

n The Homeless Emergency Program provides assistance to 95 households a year that have an unexpected and immediate housing crisis. The cuts could reduce to 36 the number of families helped.

It is important to note that the city, like all cities, will provide services to the homeless in some way, shape or form. The police department, the judicial system, jails, mental health and social services as well as medical facilities will be forced to provide for this population in increasing numbers. Consequently, the city will not save money by cutting programs designed to assist the homeless.

As a solution, we suggested to the representatives that if they had to make cuts to the CDBG, they consider incremental ones. This would allow the city, neighborhoods and communities the opportunity to develop a strategy and assess how best to support the homeless. We also suggested that they support level funding for The HEARTH Act of 2009, which focuses on homelessness prevention, providing assistance to families with children and rural programs, as well as seed money for new projects.

Speaking up for a population that has no voice and is often overlooked and misrepresented is critical to my personal mission as well as the mission of Regent University. I feel empowered and blessed to be able to do this. As I reflected on the opportunity, I realized that I, as well as many of you who are reading this, am a pink slip away from being homeless.

The vast majority of the homeless men and women I have observed, served and befriended are not drunks, do not suffer from mental illnesses and are not criminals. They are individuals who were living check to check and one day received a pink slip. In short order they found themselves living on the streets of Virginia Beach.

Many of us are a layoff, firing or illness away from being homeless, so maybe I was not lobbying for the current homeless. Maybe I was lobbying for you and me, the temporarily housed citizens of Virginia Beach.

 

Cyrus Williams is an assistant professor in psychology and counseling at Regent University.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

clarification

Reid,
Wasn't the job you "lost" a contracted position for a certain amount of time?
Correct me if I'm wrong but I was thinking you had posted that sometime in the past... If so, that's a little different than "losing" your job.

No the gov. job or responsibility

I grow tired of this "Redistribute-the-wealth" campaign. It is N-O-T the role of government to pay for people's basic needs in life - it is our job to pay for our own shelter, food, transportation, education, and healthcare.

I lost my job in November last year. I had worked at my last job for 13 years. My wife lost her job October 2009. She is a CAD Technition for architectural firms hired to design commercial structures, public schools, luxury custom homes, and churches. Due to the economy, her industry is still laying off emplyees and not really hiring.

We had set aside money over the past few decades. Unemployment didn't even cover our mortgage payment, let alone the rest of our bills.

If we would have been forced to sell our home - at a $50K loss (as our next door neighbors did) - we would have. We didn't spend every cent we earned. We set money aside. Yet, so much of the money my wife and I earn is taken from our family and redistributed to others. Imagine if we didn't have this blatant "Redistribute-the-wealth" mentality in government. How many more working families would be able to survive the loss of their jobs until the economy improved? Imagine how many more families would not be a "paycheck away from homelessness"?

Of course that means more folks would have to live within their means and not buy Hummers and homes they really cannot afford. The business (consumerism)/banking-developer-real estate lobby wouldn't want that, now would they?

Did you accept unemployment?

Because if you did, isn't that also a redistribution of wealth? Yes, employers contribute to the unemployment fund, but so does the government.

I have paid more than I ever collected

Vivian, I have had unemployment insurance paid for 31 years of my working career. During that time I have paid far more into the insurance program than I have collected. What? I don't "pay" unemployment, my employers does? Really? Perhaps my salary would be higher if my employer did not have to pay the unemployment insurance?

Maybe

Maybe your pay would be higher, but not by much. With the way that federal & state unemployment work together, your employer paid $56 in federal taxes and as much as $496 in VA unemployment last year, assuming they paid the maximum rate. More likely, they paid $46.40 for you last year.

So a little over $100. And the limits and rates over the last 30 years have been less. Assume, though, that they were the same for the whole 31 years. Did you collect more than $3,100 in unemployment benefits?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Guest Columns rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox