68°
forecast

Redistricting and race

Posted to: Opinion Vivian J. Paige

By Vivian J. Paige

Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli made headlines last fall when he said the state should not need pre-clearance of its redistricting plan from the U.S. Department of Justice, as required under the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Earlier this month, it was reported that Virginia's congressional representatives had agreed to a redistricting plan that would protect all of their seats, which includes one minority-majority district among the 11.

At the redistricting hearing held Monday evening in Norfolk, it was reported that there were "repeated calls" for "new legislative district lines calculated to increase black representation in the General Assembly and Congress."

While the focus on redistricting has been at the state level, it should be noted that localities also will be affected. In particular, cities such as Norfolk, which employs a ward system, will need to redraw lines to accommodate the changes in their population.

A quick look at the U.S. Census numbers for Norfolk indicates that each of the small five wards should have a population of about 48,500. The question is whether there can be - or should be - another minority-majority ward in the city.

Speakers at Monday's hearing argued that blacks remain under-represented at the state level. Approximately 20 percent of Virginians are black, but they occupy only 12.5 percent of the state Senate seats, 12 percent of the House of Delegates seats and 9 percent of the congressional seats.

Norfolk is about 43 percent black. Overall, the city is 53 percent minority. The current council has a 5-3 white majority; the makeup is similar for most of its appointed boards.

Of the eight members of the council, the mayor is elected at large, two members each represent half of the city (superwards) and the remaining five each represent one area.

As currently configured, the two small wards currently represented by black members of council are 66 percent and 71 percent black and encompass more than 62 percent of all of the city's black residents. This virtually guarantees that those two council seats will be represented by a black member. The opposite is also true: The other three small wards, all with black populations under 30 percent, will more than likely be represented by a white member.

In a perfect world, none of this would matter. Candidates would be elected on the strength of their platforms and demonstrated ability to get the job done. Unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect world.

In our imperfect world, there remains a need to level the playing field. It is why Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is permanent and prohibits voting practices and procedures that have a discriminatory impact.

In our imperfect world, minorities continue to be under-represented in elected office. It is why the Justice Department's pre-clearance of the redistricting plans for Virginia and most localities, including Norfolk, is required.

In our imperfect world, minority-majority districts help to ensure an equal opportunity to participate in the political process.

Norfolk and Virginia would do well to consider how to create a more perfect world.

 

Vivian J. Paige writes about local politics and other topics at blog.vivianpaige.com. Email: blog@vivianpaige.com.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Indeed

This IS an imperfect world. However, this imperfect world just saw a black man with a name which has Arabic, Swahili, and Kenyan roots elected by a country which is roughly 65% white and 12.5% black. Based on what I took from your opinion piece, you are suggesting that redistricting will help black communities by adding more minority candidates at the state level. What happens if these communities elect a white candidate who will represent the black community well? This throws off the numbers, right? You are suggesting it's not enough to elect quality candidates, but that they MUST be minorities. That means that had these communities elected Bill Clinton, the first "black" president, to represent them, it would've been a travesty since it ruins the numbers at the state level. Why don't we, in Virginia, follow the U.S. as a whole and elect candidates based on MERIT, not race. Isn't that what America did last election? I would say that America seems more "progressive" than what you are suggesting.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Opinion rss feed    Vivian J. Paige rss feed   


Toolbox