68°
forecast

5 Somali pirates get life for attack on Nicholas

Posted to: Crime Military News Norfolk

NORFOLK

Four of five Somalis convicted of piracy in an attack on a Navy warship remained defiant as they were sentenced to life in prison Monday, each vowing to appeal, with one demanding an explanation of exactly how he was convicted.

"I did not kill anybody. I did not rob anybody. I did not attack anybody," Somali defendant Abdi Mohammed Umar told U.S. District Judge Mark S. Davis through an interpreter. "I'd like to be told the reason I have been found guilty on this case."

Davis explained that a jury found him and his co-defendants guilty of piracy and related charges after a trial last fall. The judge also noted that the Somalis confessed.

The judge then sentenced Umar to life in prison plus 80 years. He gave identical prison terms to the others: Mohammed Modin Hasan, Gabul Abdullahi Ali, Abdi Wali Dire and Abdi Mohammed Gurewardher.

The life prison term was mandatory under federal piracy law.

Only defendant Hasan seemed contrite.

"I am sorry that I have been accused of these crimes," he told the judge.

But the others demanded an appeal.

"I find the crime that I was found guilty of is unjust," defendant Gurewardher said.

"I'm not accepting the outcome of this case," Dire said. "I'd like to appeal."

Hasan, Ali and Dire were in what prosecutors called an attack skiff, armed with AK-47s and a rocket-propelled grenade launcher, the morning of April 1, 2010, when they fired at the Norfolk-based frigate Nicholas, thinking it was a merchant vessel.

The Nicholas captured those three and then a few hours later captured Umar and Gurewardher in what was called a mother ship, loaded with enough provisions and fuel to last several weeks.

Three of the defendants testified at trial that they were kidnapped by the real pirates and forced to take part in the attack. The judge noted that the jury apparently rejected that testimony.

U.S. Attorney Neil MacBride issued a stern warning to other pirates.

"Today's sentences should send a clear message to those who attempt to engage in piracy: Armed attacks on U.S.-flagged vessels carry severe consequences in U.S. courts," he said in a statement.

One defense attorney cautioned that the message could backfire, given statements made by Somalis after the recent pirate attack of a yacht and the slayings of four Americans.

William Holmes, who represents Ali, told the judge about a news report in which a Somali warned after the sentencing of another Somali pirate in New York that pirates would begin killing hostages. That pirate, Abduwali Muse, was sentenced to 34 years in prison after pleading guilty to the attack on the Maersk ship Alabama.

The attack on the yacht Quest happened shortly after that, Holmes said.

"We don't need anything to add gas to the fire," Holmes said.

But the judge said he must, under federal rules, consider the deterrence effect in sentencing anyone. And his hands were essentially tied under federal sentencing rules.

In all, the Somalis were convicted of 14 counts, but Davis threw out one count. He sentenced each man to life for piracy to run consecutively with the 80-year term. He added various 10- and 20-year terms, all to run concurrently to the life plus 80 years.

The only chance for the Somalis now is for an appeals court to overturn their case. There is also an appeals hearing scheduled for March 25 in Richmond that could decide whether the piracy statute is constitutional.

U.S. District Judge Raymond A. Jackson, sitting in the same courthouse as Davis, threw out the same piracy charge against six Somalis in a similar attack on the Little Creek-based dock landing ship Ashland.

Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343, tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

I was under the impression

I was under the impression the US tries you by a jury of your peers. How did this happen for the pirates? Don't get me wrong, these pirates deserve everything they get and more, but did we have US pirates handy to serve on a jury?

BTW, I like the post that said put them in a rowboat and leave them in the deep midAtlantic with one oar and a rock (for defense) and wave buh-bye.

My 2 cent

As you can see,weather sentenced to life or death there is an appeal process that costs every one.So in my opinion its not cheaper to just put peaple in prison for the rest of their life.Also to those that say release them I say this.If you release them back to where ever they got them,it puts our men and women at risk for future attacks by the pirates.Sooner or later our military will stop trying to capture them and just out right terminate them at the location where they engage the pirates which they have all the right to do.Its more humane to try to capture than to out right terminate.To those,you would complain then our miltary is wrong for these actions.The lawyer said adding fuel to the fire.There has to be a deterence to stop this.

Take No Prisoners

The US needs to look at our pirate policy. Justice is good, but at what expense? Fight the pirates then leave them behind. This is such a game with them.

Also, I do not think they will last too long in prison once you mix them in the general population.

Let them go

Send them back home. Maybe next time we will have figured out how to deal with them. I don't want my tax dollars feeding and clothing them, giving them recreation and health care. I'd much rather just send them back to the mess they came from to regroup and try their business again. We'll get it right eventually. As far as those possible victims in the area, take care of yourselves, protect yourselves, call for help if you get in trouble. Much cheaper on our damaged financial situation. Drop them off out in a replica of their boat, same area. Case closed. Millions saved.

Wate of tax payers money!

Next time if weapons are drawn in international waters then turn them into chum. You have to talk dog to a dog and cat to cat, speaking zebra to a badger does not work.

Pirates Conviction

Well now, they were convicted of privacy and sentenced to life + 80 years, and one of them says he will "appeal". Now we will have to feed these "thugs",give them a roof over their heads, and jumpsuits for life, and one of there thugs says he will appeal! Yea,I can just see him appealing a sentence in his own country, a bullet between the eyes,case closed!
no feeding for life,or clean clothes,or a roof over their heads,at the expense of the taxpayer. They should have been sent to Kenya for trial,
not returned to our soil for trial. We have enough problems here without importing more. The only good pirate, is a dead pirate! No sentence,no appeal.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Pirates should be shot and killed on the spot while attempting to commit the act. This will save taxpayers a ton of dough and deter other would-be pirates from doing the same.

Kill you twice

Only in the american court you can kill someone twice.

prison industrial complex

The government chooses to put people in prison to support the prison industrial complex. Many people make money and have jobs due to people being in prison. I believe only dangerous people should be locked up. Non-dangerous offenders should be given fines and/or communite service.
America incarcerates more people than any other nation on earth. Much money is made by the government scaring the average person. Why weren't these pirates tried by the World Court in the Hague? Didn't these crimes occur in international waters?

The only reason we

The only reason we incarcerate so many people is because its not politically correct in the US to hang someone for stealing any more. Public executions were quite a deterent to crime back in the day. You certainly have to keep people like this away from society or they will just do it again, and again and again. As far as the expense goes, in many nations it is the responsibility of the bad guy's family or friends to bring them food and clothes while in prison or they just get bread and water. So theres one idea. And for the record, I'm philosophically opposed to the death penalty. I just think its a pragmatic solution that goes against my personal sense of morality.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    Military rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features