The Virginian-Pilot
©
Former Old Dominion University President Roseann Runte will have to provide testimony for former state Del. Phil Hamilton's bribery and extortion trial, the judge in the case ruled Friday.
Runte had tried to avoid testifying, saying she's too busy.
In legal papers filed Friday on her behalf by a Washington attorney, Runte said she has a full schedule of meetings, speeches and other events as president of Carleton University. She said changing her schedule on short notice for a trial deposition "would greatly inconvenience both Dr. Runte and negatively reflect on the university."
U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson denied her plea within hours, clearing the way for Hamilton's attorney, Andrew Sacks, to take Runte's deposition before the trial begins May 2. Sacks has filed notice of his intent to do so Friday in Runte's office in Ottawa, Ontario. Runte's testimony will be videotaped for use during the trial.
An internal audit at ODU in 2009 found that Runte met with Hamilton three times before the state lawmaker was put on the university payroll in 2007. He arranged the job as director of a new teacher training center while he was helping secure funding for it in the legislature.
The university paid Hamilton $80,000 over two years. The Newport News Republican's relationship with ODU became an issue in his re-election campaign, and he was defeated in 2009 after a 21-year legislative career.
Runte has acknowledged meeting with Hamilton about his efforts to fund the teacher center but says she had no involvement in or knowledge of his being hired to run it.
In legal papers seeking Runte's testimony, Hamilton has indicated she would be expected to rebut government witnesses' testimony about her role in the affair.
He has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges, saying he never conditioned his support for funding on getting a job.
Bill Sizemore, (757) 446-2276, bill.sizemore@pilotonline.com
____
DOCUMENT: ROSEANN RUNTE'S MOTION

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
If you read Dr. Runte's disposition...
...and assuming it is all true, it APPEARS the Defendant and/or his Councel are fishing for a scapegoat; however, I could be wrong.
Runte's obligation
She's does not reside in this Country and has no obligation to befriend a Virginia Politician on trial for misconduct. The Court is out of its jurisdiction and appears to be blowing lots of smoke.
I'd have initially thought
I'd have initially thought you to be correct. Turns out that the prosecution can apply to the US court for "letters rogatory" seeking assistance from a Canadian court. The Canadian court can then issue a subpoena requiring appearance at a deposition in Canada. In order to get the Canadian court to issue its subpoena, the American prosecutor must show that the deposition won't cause undue burden on the deponent, and provide assurance that the deponent will not be prosecuted in the United States. http://apps.americanbar.org/buslaw/newsletter/0044/materials/pp1.pdf
This forces her to testify
This forces her to testify under oath. Seems like a good idea to me.
I mean, it would be all too convenient if she has fault, but she can get out of it by being too busy.
Fine. Clam up. Stonewall.
Let Broderick take the fall.
Ni-i-i-ice.
grab the broom
It's time to sweep all this under the rug and move on. Politicians are just too smart for the little people to understand why they do such things. Nothing to see here people. Now go back to your regularly scheduled feeding.
Canada
She's in Canada. What are they going to do if she refuses to testify, extradite her? I seriously doubt it and who is going to pay her expenses to get her here for the hearing?
5th amendment
She could have saved all this ink by pleading the 5th !
What a waste
Roseann Runte was a great president at ODU. This trial is a waste and involving her at this point is wrong. She has moved to a new job and should not have to answer questions about old business.
What a waste
Roseann Runte was a great president at ODU. This trial is a waste and involving her at this point is wrong. She has moved to a new job and should not have to answer questions about old business.