©
It's no particular surprise that a congressman from 3,000 miles away would introduce a bill to accelerate drilling off the coast of Virginia. The surprise is that any Virginia congressman would help.
But U.S. Reps. Scott Rigell and Rob Wittman are co-sponsoring a bill by Rep. Doc Hastings, the head of the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee.
For the Republican congressman from Washington state and his constituents, drilling off Virginia is a great deal. They don't face the risk of a spill, and any oil or gas found off Virginia's coast would produce financial benefits for the Evergreen State.
Perhaps Virginians thought they might directly benefit since they would also absorb most of the risk. Nope.
The current federal royalty scheme wouldn't give Virginia money from drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf. Even if all other states agreed to forgo federal royalties, Virginia would still be cheated. That's because the map allocating offshore territory gives Virginia only a small, pie-shaped piece of the Atlantic Ocean. Much of Virginia's ocean - and royalties - belongs to Maryland and North Carolina.
Hastings makes his case this way: "The majority of Americans support off-shore energy production, and these bills will allow it to move forward in a safe, responsible and efficient manner." Interestingly, all U.S. senators from the West Coast have asked that new drilling off their coast be prohibited.
In a statement, Hastings cited the usual arguments for drilling off Virginia - jobs and lower gas prices. But if the offshore industry in the Gulf of Mexico is any indication, many workers fly in and out, spending minimal time in nearby communities.
And since gas prices are set on the world market, it is unlikely that a petroleum multinational will give local discounts out of the goodness of their hearts. They certainly haven't done so along the Gulf of Mexico or in California, which has wells off its shores.
But this isn't really about logic, or arguments or costs and benefits.
The oil industry is very powerful in Washington, D.C., and Richmond. Less than a year after the disaster in the gulf, the petroleum industry's leaders are pushing as hard as they can to drill off Virginia's coast because they believe it will lead to drilling off every coast.
They couldn't care less whether this represents a good deal for Virginians or for the people of Hampton Roads. They have their eyes elsewhere.
It's no wonder that a guy from the West Coast would want to get things started by drilling off Virginia Beach. It's what the oil companies want. But given last year's disaster, and the horrendous deal this represents for the commonwealth, Virginians should be skeptical of such illusory treasures - and any politician who promises them.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
NIMBY will have us freezing in the dark
So, the Pilot's Editorial Board wants to live in an industrial society with all of its conveniences and freedom of travel, but it wants all the risks associated with those benefits to be borne by someone else. The board is not alone.
Much of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico is off limits to drilling because Floridians take the same attitude. The same is true off the West Coast and much of the Atlantic, and of plains state residents who fear recovery of oil shale. Much of Alaska is off limits due to the lobbying of people who have never been there.
It is true that the small amount of liquid petroleum that might be recovered off the Virginia coast would not significantly change the price of oil in the international market, but in the aggregate, the areas held off limits due to NIMBYism are many times the output of Libya, the uncertainty of which has driven crude prices to near record levels.
Local supplies of natural gas, because of the high transmission costs associated with gas pipelines would has significant effects economic benefits ot the area, especially in the quantities needed to displace coal for generating electricity.
And its not just offshore drilling, NIMBYists also fight uranium mining, coal mining and use, and pretty much all of the energy industry, yet they want the energy necessary to our way of life and at affordable prices.
You can't have all be benefits of an industrial society and expect others to bear all the risks, because they want the same thing.