68°
forecast

One year later: Lessons unlearned

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

One year ago today, explosions rocked an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico about 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana, killing 11 men and triggering one of the nation's worst environmental disasters.

As the Deepwater Horizon platform listed and sank, engulfed in flames, nobody realized what was about to happen to the Gulf, to its surrounding communities, to the people who depended on the water for their livelihood.

Days later, officials from BP, which was running the drilling operation, reported that about 1,000 barrels of oil were leaking daily from the ocean floor a mile below the surface.

It marked the first of several estimates - of oil spilling, of damage, of livelihoods destroyed - that would be revised upward.

In the weeks and months that followed, as the Macondo well defied every human effort to contain its eruption, public fear and anger and frustration grew.

The White House was flatfooted, deferring to a company that was clearly out of its depth on a spill that was unprecedented. The rate of the leak was estimated at 5,000 barrels per day. Then it jumped to 12,000 to 19,000 barrels per day. It was 62,000 at its peak.

Almost from the beginning, dead fish and birds came ashore. Oil coated the Gulf floor. It washed into marshes and oyster beds. Tourists, the lifeblood of resort cities and towns along the Gulf Coast, stayed away. Watermen hauled in contaminated catches and were barred from an ever-expanding part of the Gulf.

An estimated 5 million barrels - more than 200 million gallons - of oil leaked into the Gulf by the time the Macondo well was finally sealed in August, four months after the spill began. More than 660 miles of coastline were contaminated.

Even today, the full picture of the devastation remains unclear.

BP - which has spent billions to compensate people for their losses - says things are returning to normal in the Gulf. The federal government, in September, said most of the oil had broken down or been cleaned up.

Some scientists disagree. They've found thick, oily sediment coating marine life on the Gulf floor. Petroleum-contaminated dead zones have been found where life once teemed.

The Gulf's water and air were polluted for months. The effects won't be known for years.

Cleanup crews sprayed more than a million gallons of a chemical dispersant into the Gulf in a bid to break down the oil, as the Environmental Protection Agency warned it could cause unintended effects.

 

Even the cause of the explosion and subsequent leak remains uncertain.

Court and congressional testimony has revealed some crew members acknowledged failing to follow emergency protocol in the moments before the Deepwater Horizon exploded, and there remain questions about whether the blowout preventer actually malfunctioned.

Washington has tightened regulations designed to prevent a repeat of the Gulf disaster. Thankfully, nobody has yet had to test whether that is enough to prevent a repeat.

They will.

Crews pursuing drilling off America's coasts undoubtedly will encounter another "nightmare well," as one BP engineer described the Macondo well a week before it exploded.

The White House has chosen to delay plans to open the Outer Continental Shelf - including off Virginia - to oil and gas drilling.

The administration says it wants to know, more completely, what happened in the Gulf last year.

Despite that, seven state lawmakers sent a letter this week to Virginia's congressional delegation. The delegates and senators support proposals to initiate exploration and development of offshore oil and natural gas as soon as next year. They'll get receptive ears.

Both U.S. Reps. Scott Rigell and Rob Wittman - who represent Virginia's coast - have joined a push by a Washington state congressman to open Virginia's ocean to oil companies.

This, despite the fact that so much remains unclear about what happened a year ago aboard - and below - the Deepwater Horizon. About the long-term effects of the disaster. And about what could've been done to prevent it.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

The Answer: Natural Gas Only

The Pilot always conflates oil and natural gas. Your good arguments are mainly related to oil. But you imply you are speaking of everything.

So let's take oil off the table. Just drill for natural gas. Leaks don't matter that much.

Will the Pilot stop being an obstacle and instead help us find the best way to drill for natural gas?

We can hope.

Bruce Deitrick Price

As I predicted a year ago

The hype and government reaction have done far more harm to the people of the Gulf Coast than the spill itself. That remains true even though the spill turned out to be much larger than the early Coast Guard estimates of 5000 barrels a day.

http://hamptonroads.com/2010/04/gulf-oil-spill-gets-attention-norfolk-meeting-drilling#comment-899137

Thousands are out of work because the EPA has made the permitting process an effective ban on new wells until very recently, too late to prevent many of the rigs from moving over seas.

Many more are suffering because of the mistaken impression that seafood from the area is tainted, and distributors have found other sources of seafood overseas during the time the area was closed.

And, worst of all, extremists use the spill, the first major spill in the industry in over 40 years, to block needed drilling there and elsewhere.

And still it continues.

The coverage of this spill has proved to be the equivalent of falsely shouting "fire" in a crowded theater.

we must drill more

Let us drill 15 miles off the coast of VA because there is nat gas and oil there. We need oil independence.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox