The Virginian-Pilot
©
Editors note: An earlier version of this story contained incorrect information. While a candidate, Rep. Scott Rigell was supported by members of the Hampton Roads Tea Party, but was not endorsed by it.
____
U.S. Rep. Scott Rigell took a hard line when he voted Friday against a last-minute bill to stop a federal government shutdown - the lone Virginia member of Congress to do so.
The Virginia Beach Republican, whose district has a large military and veteran community, acknowledged that his vote - if it had been in the majority - would have effectively closed most government functions and halted or delayed pay for almost all government personnel, including the military.
But Rigell said Monday that the severity of the nation's large federal deficit outweighs his desire to keep funding the government. The measure approved Friday and a companion bill being discussed this week to make cuts in federal spending don't go far enough, he said.
"It was clear to me that the decisions that had been agreed to did not adequately address the fiscal crisis," he said, adding that he believes residents of the 2nd Congressional District support his position. The district includes Virginia Beach, part of Norfolk and the Eastern Shore.
The deficit "threatens the foundation of our country," Rigell said. "I have a deep resolve that it needs to be addressed now. It needs to be this Congress, this year."
Before Friday's vote, Rigell also had supported, without success, a GOP House proposal to approve a defense budget for the rest of the fiscal year while the remainder of federal spending was still being debated.
Congress agreed shortly before a midnight deadline on Friday to continue funding the government for another week to give time to enact a new compromise bill to fund the government until Sept. 30. The House vote was 348-70.
Rigell said it would have been "duplicitous" to vote for extending government spending one more week when he already knew he couldn't support the new spending deal, which had been worked out by House and Senate leaders and President Barack Obama.
The details of the budget bill were still being compiled by legislative staff Monday.
Legislative leaders expect about $38 billion will be cut from the current budget, which runs until Sept. 30. Congress had already agreed to about $12 billion of those cuts in previous legislation.
The latest round includes $13 billion in cuts to the departments of Labor, Education and Health and Human Services in addition to $8 billion in cuts to the State Department and foreign aid, according to legislative staff. Another $1 billion in across-the-board cuts would affect domestic agencies.
That's not deep enough, Rigell said.
Rigell, who was supported by members of the Hampton Roads Tea Party, said during his election campaign last year that he wanted to freeze all federal hiring, cancel all federal stimulus programs and make changes to Social Security and Medicare for younger workers because they are too costly. He also has argued that significant savings can be achieved by eliminating "duplicating programs" and bureaucracies that exist because federal agencies operate independently of each other.
Three of Hampton Roads' other federal legislators - Sens. Jim Webb and Mark Warner, both Democrats, and Rep. Bobby Scott - are waiting to see the details of the compromise plan before discussing how they might vote. Rep. Randy Forbes could not be reached for comment.
Scott, a Newport News Democrat, said he's not certain whether he will support the new budget bill because of concerns that some money meant to pay for part of the new health care law may have been cut. He has been a strong proponent of the new law.
"I want to see all of the details," Scott said.
The Associated Press and The New York Times contributed to this report.
Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Pragmatic not Political
First, this debate needs to be placed in context. Because the government borrows forty-three cents on each dollar of its $3.8T budget, a $100B cut is similar (in rough numbers) to our family having a monthly credit card bill of $10,000, but we can only pay $6,000 so my wife and I argue heatedly and incessantly about how to cut $26 of spending.
Rep Rigell has rightly identified the problem: our country is in a fiscal crisis. Immediate action is necessary. In this context, Rep. Rigell attempted to take military pay out of the budget equation and deal with the rest. Denied this option by those who place political interest above all else, he made the correct choice: economic survival over political spin.
So, fellow citizens, we need to find a way
Sticking to his guns
I appluad Rigell for standing for what he believes is right, and it just so happens it is right. Our country is on an unsustainable path towards a terrible economic demise, the recession of 2008-now will pale in comparison to what's coming if our leaders don't act with decisiveness and speed. This is not something we can leave to the petty partisan bickering that seems to eminate from Washington. Scott is fighting not just for the future of those who voted for him, rather, he is fighting for all of his constituents and the nation as a whole.
CONGRESSMAN RIGELL TAKES THE RIGHT STAND
The bottom line is we face a grave crisis in America and are quickly going the way of Greece. We are on the verge of a fiscal crisis as great as any in our nation's history, and Congressmen Rigell was right to take a stand against cutting just 1% of the budget.
Bottom line? The same week the White House bragged about "cutting" $38 billion, the federal debt grew by $54 billion! First rule is when you are in a ditch, stop digging! Congressman Rigell understands this, too bad too many Washington insiders do not.
Thank you Congressman Rigell for taking the heat to do the right thing and cast the right vote.
Ditch
Seems some people have a real short memory about who drove us into this ditch. Bush and Cheyney and unpaid for tax cuts, unpaid for war based on lies, no-bid government contracts (Haliburton and Cheney and Bush got filthy rich off of Iraq) Excuse me if I am just a little jaded as to what Scott Rigel thinks - did that 1% of the budget include the "cash for clunkers" program that kept his business afloat on my dime? The guy is a creep and owned in full by the republican pacs. If he wants to dance its to their tune and their piper or the PAC money stops and he won't get re-elected. Heck, the way people are responding to him now he may get re-called. Anyone interested?
Thank you Representative Rigell
A $1.4 trillion deficit in one year and they're haggling over $38 billion? That's like having a $1,400 balance on your credit card and worrying if you're going to pay $33 or $38 when the bill is due.
Thank you, Representative Rigell, for casting a principled vote which is easy for your opponents to make political hay over. Something needs to be shook up and shut down in DC.
Spin it as he may....
it was a vote to shut down the government and consequently stop payment to the very men and women that he purports to support...the troops. All because Democrats wanted to provide funding to an organization which provides health care services to poor women. Unbelievable.
All because...
They are using tax payer money to provide services to "poor women"...how is that fair to men? That isn't equal. Why should tax dollars be spent on providing "poor women" health care services when they didn't want to spend $10.00 on condoms or maybe they are just that irresponsible? How can they even be considered health care providers? They don't want to be made subject to the same rules & regulations the primary care physicians have to in order to care for people...men, women & children.
Since when have democrats cared a lick about the military? Even one of the hero's of the left John Kerry had negative things to say.
I don't have a milk cow. I wish your milk cow would die.
To each his own, but I personally do not feel jealous or abused and ill treated in the least knowing that poor women can receive a free cancer screenings. I applaud the humanity of the service and if poor men could get cancer screenings as well, that would be even better. If this wealthy nation can find billions of dollars to spend on weapons but cannot find the funds to help take care of the least of its citizens, that is a black mark on the nations moral character.
It is not constitutional to provide services for one segment of
...of society and refuse services for all others. Because this happens to be one of the little pet ear marks of the democrats it gets special attention/consideration and is in your minds exempt from scrutiny.
If this were ONLY about cancer screenings and promoting a PREVENTIVE approach to pregnancy it would be one thing.
The Cancer Institute- "...(HPVs) are a group of more than 150 related viruses, of which more than 40 types can be sexually transmitted." "Persistent infections with high-risk HPVs are the primary cause of cervical cancer.". This is the cancer screening they provide...correct?
Bad behavior can result in bad health and you want to give health-care away to (some) people who have no interest in personal responsibility.
At his best.
Putting people out of jobs is what Rigell does best just ask one his employees at the Chesapeake dealership he owns. Oh wait you can't as soon as he was elected the dealership was sold and all the people that worked there canned.