68°
forecast

Suffolk plans to cut ties with HRT by end of year

Posted to: Local Government News Suffolk Traffic - Transportation

SUFFOLK

In an effort to cut costs, city leaders plan to eliminate Hampton Roads Transit bus service by the end of the year and hire a private firm to provide public transportation.

City Manager Selena Cuffee-Glenn suggested last week that cutting ties with HRT could save the city $233,000 next fiscal year. The plan is part of the fiscal 2012 budget she presented to the City Council last week.

She called for dropping the city’s contract with HRT effective Jan. 1 and exploring service with I-Ride, a private operation run by Senior Services of Southeastern Virginia that serves Isle of Wight County and Franklin.

“Based on the cost to Suffolk and the poor ridership, we need a new business model,” city spokeswoman Debbie George said. She said the proposed budget would pay for six months of HRT service while the city investigates “a model less costly and more efficient for taxpayers.”

The move comes as HRT considers cutting two of the city’s four bus routes because of low ridership after conducting an efficiency study of its bus system.

The transit agency proposed eliminating the Holland Road/Paul D. Camp route between downtown and Paul D. Camp Community College. It also suggested cutting the Kingsboro/Wilroy Road route northeast of downtown.

Daily ridership on those routes are the lowest in the city, averaging just 73 and 82 respectively.

HRT also recommended cutting three other routes – one each in Virginia Beach, Portsmouth and Hampton. Doing so, it said, would save $4.2 million a year – $2.2 million of which would be reinvested in the most popular routes and $2 million to be returned to the agency and its member cities.

The HRT board is expected to vote on the proposal in May.

Suffolk’s buses are among the worst performers in the HRT system. The average subsidy per ride throughout the system is $2.23. Suffolk’s subsidy ranges from $6 to $13.50 per passenger. At 9.2 percent, Suffolk also has the lowest farebox recovery rate in the HRT system. The other cities cover 20 to 25 percent of costs from fares.

State and federal aid pays for 41.3 percent of the costs and the city contributes 49.5 percent.

This fiscal year, the city’s contribution to HRT is $755,000. Nearly $275,000 of that goes toward administrative costs, which is shared equally among the seven cities that make up HRT.

After reviewing the study, HRT president and CEO Philip Shucet recommended that Suffolk consider other options and suggested I-Ride as a possible alternative.

“We felt it was our responsibility to make them aware of this demand service that in our judgment could be substituted for our service and provide a service at a lower cost to the city and potentially to the rider as well,” Shucet said.

Although I-Ride service in Isle of Wight County and Franklin is aimed mainly at the elderly, it accepts riders of all ages. It runs regularly scheduled routes and charges a $1 fare. HRT bus fares are $1.50.

If Suffolk drops out of HRT, the other cities would have to absorb Suffolk’s share of the agency’s overhead. But they also will share the state and federal funds that are now applied to Suffolk’s service.

An early estimate of the overall financial impact to the other cities shows they would have to pay an additional $340,000, Shucet said, which would be divided among them based on how much bus service each city has.

“If we were a private company, we wouldn’t be giving away business, but we’re not a private company,” Shucet said. “If there’s something better that serves the purpose of public transportation more efficiently, I think that’s good.”

Jeff Sheler, (757) 222-5563, jeff.sheler@pilotonline.com

Debbie Messina, (757) 446-2588, debbie.messina@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

HRT : Financial Black Hole

To report financial waste, fraud, or abuse of tax dollars; call 1- 800-HRT-Tide. If line is busy www. fraim train or www. train to nowhere

TRT/HRT & SUFFOLK

As of 1980, Tidewater Regional Transit [now HRT] operated six bus routes within the Suffolk area. Headways, on average, were sixty-minutely, with one line offering service every thirty-five minutes. Obviously, ridership and service has declined over the past three decades or so, leading to action to privatize the bus service.

Suffolk might be better served by a MAXI-RIDE type-of-service once provided by TRT [but not in Suffolk]. This was a non-fixed route on-call/demand operation.

A somewhat similar change-of-carrier occurred in Portsmouth many years ago when buses of Community Motor Bus Co. replaced those of Virginia Transit. In turn, TRT/HRT assumed the Portsmouth lines, although not without subsequent service changes.

Dominoes?

Could the dominoes begin falling for HRT? No, all the other Hampton Roads cities won't rush to pull out of the regional transit agancy, but those cities will be watching to see what happens in Suffolk very carefully. HRT has demonstrated time and again that it is poorly managed. When I read that HRT President and CEO Philip Shucet "recommended that Suffolk consider other options", that tells me even Mr. Shucet acknowledges HRT's inefficient practices. HRT quietly re-organized its top management staff in February, but still has a ways to go in rooting out the dead-weights who still populate the Chief and Director positions throughout the agency. HRT still has not purged all those responsible for the light rail fiasco.

Additionally

Here! Hear!

I didn't see any comments on the efficiency in moving to a privitized service or the fact that people will pay less using I-Ride.

Ref. "It runs regularly scheduled routes and charges a $1 fare.,/strong> HRT bus fares are $1.50."

SOS

if the Pilot wasnt so in the tank for HRT this would be the lead story

a small measure of sanity

and the house of cards starts to crumble....get the rest of your house in order Suffolk, your star could start to brighten..

No wonder HRT is in trouble.

Only at HRT: Remove service from Suffolk and increase costs to the remaining participating cities. Removing a service should remove all associated costs. No wonder HRT is in trouble.

Costs

There are no Suffolk-specific administrative personnel, only the Operations people on the ground there.

In turn, you now have to divide the administrative cost six ways rather than 7 ways.

Excellent!!!

HRT is a money pit.

Good job Suffolk! I hope you are able to continue on the Common Sense Budget train

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Local Government rss feed    News rss feed    Traffic - Transportation rss feed   



Toolbox


FIND US ON FACEBOOK