68°
forecast

Bill by Rigell would halt spending on Libya fighting

Posted to: News Politics

U.S. Rep. Scott Rigell said Friday that he wants American forces to end their participation in United Nations military actions against Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi immediately. The Virginia Beach Republican introduced legislation this week that would prohibit spending any more federal dollars on the Libyan campaign.

"We're engaging ourselves essentially in a civil war," said Rigell, adding that very little is known about the rebels supported by U.S. firepower.

Rigell has spoken out in the past against President Barack Obama's decision to launch airstrikes beginning in mid-March against Libyan forces without approval from Congress.

Rigell said his bill is meant to force the issue by challenging the president's authority to act without first seeking the support of Congress and whether the United States should be involved in another country's internal conflict.

With the legislative branch focused on the federal budget and the recession, the Libyan military campaign "hasn't gotten the attention is deserves," he said.

"One of the ways we honor our men and women in uniform is we honor and adhere to the Constitution that they are defending," Rigell said. "I do not think our founding fathers intended that one person could commit our armed forces to military action... unless there was a threat or we had been attacked."

"It was clear that American lives were not at risk. It was clear the security of the United States was not at risk," he said.

As part of a United Nations effort, U.S. and European military forces began air assaults against Gadhafi's forces after the leader began killing Libyan civilians seeking to drive him out of power.

Obama has said U.S. involvement was justified because it was to be limited and would stop what he characterized as a looming genocide.

Although the United Nations has controlled all military operations involving Libya since March 31, American forces provide most of the equipment and manpower for intelligence-gathering, surveillance and aerial refueling, according to the Defense Department.

Sixteen countries have provided aircraft - with about one in four coming from the United States - and nine nations have provided ships.

Rigell's bill was introduced Wednesday with no co-sponsors, but he said he expects other legislators to endorse it.

Rigell, represents the Virginia's 2nd Congressional District, which has one of the highest concentrations of active-duty and retired military in the country. It includes Virginia Beach and the Eastern Shore and parts of Norfolk and Hampton.

This report contains information from The New York Times.

Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

What A Waste!

With soliders dying in the Middle East everyday and our nation in massive debt, how can we commit our precious resources to waste. It is egregious that our boys are fighting and dying in a war that merits no American involvement. In times like these, we must stand up for what is right. I am so thankful the Congressman Rigell is proposing legislation that will keep one dime or any American boots out of Libya.

An Unecessary Sacrifice

America has the best and most prepared Armed Forces on the planet. We can protect ourselves from any threat, but that does not mean that we need to be involved in unnecessary conflicts. Not only do we have no right or reason to be in Libya, our involvement there is a clear violation of the Constitution. We need more lawmakers to make a clear stand against this infrigement of the Constitutional limitations. If we don't, we risk losing the core values and principles this great nation is founded on. I am glad that my representative Congresman Rigell is doing all he can to end this travesty.

Good Job

Way to go Scott at last a politician with the gift of discernment.

no threat

There is no direct threat to US fm Libya so we shouldn't be risking American lives and treasure there. Would you want your son or daughter to die there? For what?

there was no threat

There was no proven threat by Saddam either but we lost thousands of lives.

Gertz Point: Scott Rigell had nothing to do with Iraq...

...he just took office in the U.S. House of Representatives in January 2011.

I like this

Not bad Scott, your stand takes courage. How about we cut funding for Afghanistan while we are it or at least force a vote. We should never have started war in Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya. We need to have a smaller force to tight Al Qaeda strategically placed. We took our eye off the ball in 2003 in Afghanistan and it's too late now to waste precious recources on Taliban, which is not Al Qaida.

Not going far enough.

"Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes … known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.… No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
-James Madison, 1795

Read it twice....let it sink in. It's remains true today.

We represent 43% of all military spending in the world. China and Russia, a little over 10%.

We have to stop spending money on ALL the middle east countries, and bring our troops home from the other 100 countries they're stuck in.

We can't afford to protect the world from itself anymore.

(-US Army retire

War Powers and the Constitution

The commitment of US forces to an armed conflict requires Congressional authorization. If you believe that the War Powers Act is constitutional, the President has violated its precepts. If you disregard the War Powers Act, the Constitution allows only the Congress to declare war. When forces are committed to armed conflict, unless in self defence, the Congress must act. This Congress needs to stop the executive branch from overstepping its powers over the legislative. Mr. Rigell is correct in forwarding this bill and I would expect all free-minded persons from either party to support it.

Thank you, Scott...

"In 2007, President Barack Obama gave a clear statement of his understanding of the law of war in the United States: Congress must authorize any military action that does not pose an imminent threat to the United States of America. Obama said:"

How was Libya a THREAT to the U.S....NO Rules apply to Obama! Arrogant!

I totally approve of his "Hit" on Bin Laden....but he should NOT be allowed to spend Billions on Libya without congressional approval!

The UN & Arab/Muslim League said Jump and he said "how far"?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    Politics rss feed   


Toolbox