©
President Barack Obama's approach to drilling off Virginia has been one inconsistency and reversed commitment after another.
Last spring, the administration began clearing the way for drilling off Virginia. Late last summer, after the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, the White House reversed course.
Now, in the face of brutal gasoline prices and a concerted campaign from the House of Representatives and Richmond, the president reversed course again. It's a move that serves the administration's political ambitions more than it does the nation's energy needs.
That the White House stops just short of encouraging actual oil and natural gas production - as the administration seems intent on doing in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico - should come as precious small comfort for Virginians.
The arguments against drilling haven't changed since the first time a politician tried to win points by arguing that the solution to America's current energy crisis was just a well away.
1. The current federal scheme promises Virginia no royalties.
2. The allocation map gives most of Virginia's offshore territory to Maryland and North Carolina.
3. Even after tightening, regulation remains insufficient to protect the environment or current industries.
4. Offshore facilities would complicate Navy training.
Domestic oil and gas are critical to American economic security and even our national well-being. As are domestic alternatives to petroleum. As is energy efficiency. An economy as huge and energy-dependent as America's will need to tap every source it can.
There are proven major oil reserves in Alaska, where the risks of drilling are relatively minor. That's also true for all but the deepest wells in the Gulf, despite last summer's spill. Suspected reserves exist all over America, but the industry has decided that many aren't worth either the trouble or the expense.
If past data turn out to be at all accurate, there's not much oil or natural gas off Virginia. There's another treasure, the real lure of Virginia's outer continental shelf: the prospect of prying open the ocean floor off America's populous and prosperous East Coast.
There's no other plausible explanation for this eagerness to drill off Virginia. Unless there is a major surprise discovery, drilling will do nothing for the punishing price of a gallon of gasoline. And because oil goes to international markets, it would do nothing to lower the specific price Virginians pay at the pump.
Even if crews managed to pump as much oil as was leaking out of the Macondo well in the Gulf, it wouldn't make a dent in gas prices. (Nearly 5 million barrels leaked into the Gulf over four months. The United States imports twice as much - every single day.) Not enough to change gas prices, but certainly enough to endanger the region's tourism and fishing and water-recreation industries. Not to mention the environment.
There is a reasonable argument to be had about the wisdom of continuing to explore Virginia's offshore territory. But until the federal government changes the rules, it makes no more sense now than it did five years ago.
"Philosophically, this page simply can't advocate proceeding in ignorance," we wrote, as the Bush administration made a similar move. "If there is significant [natural] gas and oil off Virginia's shores, Virginia should know it....
"The biggest risks to our environment, our culture and our economy come from producing whatever might be out there. Gas production is about as benign as any fossil fuel extraction. It's clearly less worrisome than oil production, at least at the wellhead.
"Unfortunately, under the current federal scheme, there's really no practical difference between producing oil and gas, which are often found together. If exploration finds oil, the same rules that allow companies to extract gas will let them extract oil."
Nothing has changed in the past five years to make drilling off Virginia a better idea. A year after a disaster in the Gulf, nothing has changed in Washington to make the prospect of drilling more attractive. Nothing, that is, but the calculus of political advantage.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Drilling off shore
To drill or not to drill will always be a political football. No one knows for sure what is under the waters off Virginia. Why not drill some test holes and than decide if it is worth the trouble to proceed with the drilling. One reason not to drill really bugs me. It is the statement that Navy training would be effected. It is OK to put hundreds of wind mills up of shore that would be a bigger threat to Navy training. Also what about all the wells in the Persian Gulf the Navy has to operate around. Seems to me training around them hear would be a bonus.
The navy
Offshore oil and gas drilling would be in deep water, right in the middle of their training area. Offshore wind power wouild be in shallow water. That's why the Navy officially opposes offshore drilling and supports offshore wind.
The Navy is capable of operating in a variety of hostile environments. That is not an arguement in favor of mining the Hampton Roads harbor.
So, jobs don't matter
Having worked in the offshore petroleum industry many years ago, and living much of my life in the South Louisiana Oil Patch, I am amazed that any rational area with the opportunity to bring in those quality jobs would hesitate to do so.
Many of the people I worked with (I was on a tugboat) were commercial fishermen. We worked a schedule of 7 days on and 7 off, and they shared a commercial operation with others on the opposite shift. The oil industry support jobs they held provided their families with a steady income and insurance they never had as commercial fishermen.
Considering the chronic low wages and lack of benefits we are plagued with here with seasonal tourism and retail jobs, it is unfathomable to me that anyone would turn away jobs of the quality offshore drilling brings.
Jobs do matter
Jobs could just as easily be created developing offshore wind (or other initiatives) that would not threaten other jobs in our tourist and fishing industries.
Really?
Where is the example of offshore wind creating an economy sustaining job base comparable to what existed in Southern Louisiana. (at least until President Obama shut it down)
Spain went big for wind power with subsidies, and found 2 jobs lost for every 'green' job created.
So, show me the green job success story comparable to offshore oil recovery.
Jobs lost
Since Dr. Tabor brought up the issue of jobs in Southern Louisiana, how many jobs were lost due to the Deepwater Horizon disaster?
Even Virginia,
more than 1,000 miles away, lost $11.6 million in revenues due to the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
Really
My memory is that the offshore oil industry in the gulf was “shut down” as a result of the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster.
According to a study by the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium, the development of 3,200 megawatts of offshore wind would create 9,700 - 11,600 jobs within two decades without threatening other local jobs in the tourism and fishing industries. (http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9FFGV600.htm)
Including those indirectly employed in supplying components and services, the total number of jobs supported by Spain’s wind industry reached more than 30,000 in 2005 and doubled to 60,000 by 2010.
Mr. Campbell
I appreciate the link for the study, but the Pilot itself has linked to studies that have estimated as much as 15,000 jobs being created from offshore drilling. The link specified the number varies a lot based on where the oil would then go after being drilled, and if we are to assume a goal of expanding the economy I would prefer to go for the one that would expand it the best - in which case I see it as offshore drilling that does it.
Jobs are not the only factor
Maybe offshore drilling would produce marginally more jobs than offshore wind.
Despite the claims of the oil corporations and their political allies, offshore drilling will not produce revenue for Virginia, won’t significantly reduce our dependence on foreign oil, won't reduce the price at the pump, would interfere with Navy operations, and would risk environmental damage, and may threaten jobs in tourism and fishing industries. Maybe none of those individual factors are important by themselves, but look at the number of them.