68°
forecast

New Va. coalition pushing offshore wind power

Posted to: Environment News Virginia

By Steve Szkotak

RICHMOND

A new group promoting wind power off Virginia's coast challenged the state's largest utility on Tuesday to step up its investment in harnessing Atlantic winds, including development of a wind farm.

VA4Wind, a coalition of environmentalists and "green" jobs advocates, is nudging Dominion Virginia Power to take a lead in offshore winds to promote a clean energy source that could create thousands of jobs and power hundreds of thousands of homes in the commonwealth.

The coalition said it's seeking Dominion's commitment to include plans for offshore winds in its 2011 annual filing with state regulators; and, by the end of 2013, have in place plans to build a utility-scale wind farm off Virginia's coast.

"Today, we are calling on Dominion to join our team and work together with us to bring offshore wind energy to Virginia," said Glen Besa, director of the Sierra Club's Virginia chapter.

While Dominion officials said they are committed to tapping offshore winds, they must be mindful of the ultimate costs to ratepayers.

"The costs must become competitive with other conventional or renewable forms of generation for the technology to be chosen," Jim Norvelle, a spokesman for Dominion, wrote in an e-mail. "Dominion continues to pursue cost reduction options and would put plans in place to build when it is cost effective to do so."

Norvelle also said many factors are beyond Dominion's control, such as leasing and environmental reviews.

The utility has made steps to tap offshore winds, including studying the possibility of an offshore electric transmission line to support wind farm development.

The study is the first step in designing, building and operating a transmission line needed to make offshore wind resources available to its customers. The study should be finished this year and will help the utility evaluate the best options to support multiple offshore wind projects in Virginia.

While offshore winds have been used widely and for many years in Northern Europe, the U.S. is lagging in technology and manufacturing facilities.

Offshore proponents have said Virginia could be a leader in developing wind farms off its coast because of optimal conditions 20 miles offshore, a deep-water port system and the potential to create a manufacturing base in the Hampton Roads area. The nation's nuclear-powered aircraft carriers are built in Newport News.

The coalition released a letter to Thomas F. Farrell II, CEO of the utility's parent Dominion Resources Inc., in which it stressed that the state's offshore wind industry "will only flourish with your company leading the way."

"We would like to see your team continue to lead the way in innovation by adding utility-scale offshore wind energy to your generation mix," the letter, dated May 6, states.

Renewable energy now accounts for 4 percent of Dominion's electricity. It is aiming for 15 percent by 2025.

Mary Doswell, a Dominion senior vice president who is on the board of the Virginia Offshore Wind Development Authority, agreed with the coalition that the potential for wind generation is great, but costs remain the biggest stumbling block.

"That's the dilemma," she said in an interview. "We need to get the costs down. Dominion is looking at how we can track that."

Doswell compared the estimated 23-cents per kilowatt hour for electricity generated by Cape Winds, the Massachusetts wind farm that was the first approved in the U.S., and the 10-cent per kilowatt hour rate charged Dominion residential customers. "As you can see, that's quite a premium."

The Cape Winds wind farm cost about $2.6 billion to develop. Most of Dominion's electricity is now produced by coal-fired generating stations.

Besides the Sierra Club, coalition members include Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Green Jobs Alliance and Virginia Interfaith Power and Light.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

VA4Wind

Got to love these groups that seem to form overnight for any cause that comes along...Was not the Sierra Club "against" offshore wind some years ago?

Wind

We had a Department of Energy created under the Carter Administration for the sole purpose of Building a comprehensive energy policy to transition from dependence of fossil fuel/imported fuel to include Nuclear,Wind,Solar,Hydro,Coal,oil,etc. and what did we get?Nothing.Trillions have been spent in tax dollars and no comprehensive policy.Any Freshman university class could have done this in one semester.Of course they wouldn't have had the Oil lobbyists running their show.It's time for a comprehensive energy plan that is implemented as a matter of national security without outside profit driven influence.Oh well as long as we only have repubs and dems running congress this will never happen.Once we have a third party this will change.

It's about time, although it

It's about time, although it remains to be seen whether more talk will translate to action this time. Also curious if they've decided how far offshore. The tourist industry wants the wind turbines out of sight, which puts them in deep water where construction is much more expensive, transimission costs are greater, and ultimately the return on investement is much lower.

cut to the chase

DRILL BABY! DRILL! so now we're gonna have these navigational hazards scattered about or wahsed up on shore after a hurricane or nor'easter rips them form their anchorage. By the time their built and doing anything, they will be antiquated. We need to be patient and stay the natural course of oil for now and let technology slowly develop itself.

How slow do you want to go?

Even Nixon was talking about getting off oil.
And why would hurricanes and nor’easter be more likely to damage wind towers and not drilling platforms?

I am thinking the response would be NEVER

still no "wind" spills reported anywhere

Your comment makes no sense

Your comment makes no sense as it suggests that windmills will replace our need for oil. We could cover the US landscape with windmills and our oceans with them too and we would still need just as much oil as we need today. Duh.

Ahoy Dominion

Don't forget the ships that drag anchor. zzzzt!

If each of you would put a

If each of you would put a giant windmill in your front yard, we would not need to clutter up the coastal waters with green enegy sources.

I'd install solar panels if

I'd install solar panels if I lived in a house.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners