The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
The skipper of the Navy’s problem-plagued amphibious warship San Antonio pronounced it fit for deployment Thursday after 10 days of sea trials.
The ship still faces a second phase of trials next month to test its combat systems, but the first phase was arguably the more crucial because it focused on the San Antonio’s propulsion system.
The first-in-its-class, 700-foot-long amphibious transport dock has been hobbled by a string of major engine defects. In its six-year life, it has deployed only once – a 2008-09 cruise that was interrupted by a weeks-long stop in Bahrain for emergency engine repairs.
Two years later, after a complete overhaul, the four diesel engines were “purring like kittens” during the tests 80 miles off the Atlantic coast, Cmdr. Thomas Kait told reporters aboard the San Antonio after it tied up pierside at Norfolk Naval Station.
“We’re getting back to where we ought to be,” Kait said. “We’ve got a checkered past, but I think we’ve overcome that.”
Kait said the sea trials included 70 hours of tests on each engine, including full-speed operations in excess of 22 knots, all of them successful.
It appears all of the ship’s major defects have been identified and fixed, he said: “We have a clean bill of health.”
In addition to the engines, the first phase of sea trials included successful tests of the San Antonio’s steering, electrical, navigation and damage-control systems, Kait said.
The ship’s problems have had widespread ramifications.
In April, the Navy suspended the oversight authority of Norfolk Ship Support Activity, the local command responsible for supervising ship repairs done by private contractors – essentially saying it no longer trusts the command to make sure work by contractors is being done properly. The command’s civilian executive director also was replaced.
Earlier this month, the Navy terminated a five-year maintenance contract with Earl Industries LLC, the local shipyard that overhauled the San Antonio’s engines, for work on the San Antonio class of amphibious ships.
There was no indication the latest repairs weren’t done properly, the Navy said, but recent audits had uncovered problems with documents related to the ship’s overhaul.
The San Antonio was built at Northrop Grumman Corp.’s shipyard in Avondale, La.
The primary function of an amphibious transport dock is to deliver Marines for beachfront assaults.
“I think we are ready to do that,” Kait said. “We look forward to going out again and driving this ship like it was meant to be.”
Bill Sizemore, (757) 446-2276, bill.sizemore@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


The New American Work Ethic
The Pilot presents a San Antonio historical account of how Americans don't care about the quality of their work any more; it's all about getting the paycheck and the benefits.
No personal accountability, no personal pride in a job well done.
san antonio
There is enough blame to go around. The ships are built to Navy specs, the repairs are done to Navy specs and last time I looked SUPSHIP had to "bless" everything in the end before the Navy signed off on it. Like I said, there is enough blame to go around.
Cancel all the Avondale ship building contracts
The Navy needs to cancel all the Northrop Grumman ship building contracts in Avondale, La. Transfer all the ship building back up to Bath Iron Works in Maine. They build better ships and boats.
do i understand this correctly
northrop built a faulty ship, earl fixed it and the navy fired earl? if that is the case wow, another glaring example of absolute government idiocy.
Stuck with the bill
American taxpayers are still stuck with the bill to fix things that weren't done right in the first place. This article is nothing more than an attempt to put lipstick on one huge pig . . .
24 years to go
til it's mothballed.
Congratulations!
Now if they would just bring back the dungarees. These look stupid and out of place.
so did earl industries do the work
that has led to the successful INSURV trials?
Curious, Isn't it?
Wasn't it just 20 days ago that the Navy cancelled Earl's contract, yet the ship goes out on sea trial and "It appears all of the ship’s major defects have been identified and fixed, he said: “We have a clean bill of health.” Sounds to me like Earl did a good job resurrecting this derelict. More evidence to support my theory that the Navy is using Earl as their scape-goat to cover up some bad decisions on their part.