68°
forecast

Planned Parenthood expansion bid draws opposition

Posted to: Health News Virginia Beach

VIRGINIA BEACH

Most of the people who spoke at a public hearing Monday opposed Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia's proposal to add two operating rooms to its Newtown Road clinic.

The nonprofit's Virginia Beach Health Center is seeking permission from the state health commissioner for the operating rooms, a project that would cost the Planned Parenthood affiliate about $225,000. About 30 people spoke at the emotional, nearly three-hour hearing held by the Virginia Department of Health on the application.

The staff recommendation is scheduled to be released May 19 and a final decision will come later.

Dr. Robert Rashti, the affiliate's CEO, told the crowd of about 80 people that the additional capability would allow the center to surgically treat conditions such as incontinence, suspicious breast lumps and chronic pelvic pain. Patients benefiting most would be low-income women without insurance, he said.

"The project will expand the scope of services we are able to offer and improve access to gynecologic surgical services for all low-income and uninsured women in our community, women with the greatest need but the fewest resources," he said.

However, several speakers worried that the operating rooms would equip the clinic to perform second-trimester abortions.

"Abortions are what they do," said Louantha Kerr, who is with 40 Days for Life Virginia Beach.

Noting that thousands signed a petition against the clinic before it opened last year, she added, "Those same 10,615 citizens are saying again today that they don't want Planned Parenthood to be granted two operating rooms to do more abortions - later-term abortions."

According to Virginia law, second-trimester abortions must be performed by a physician licensed by the state Board of Medicine in a hospital licensed by the Virginia Department of Health. A new state law classifies clinics that perform at least five first-trimester abortions a month as hospitals that must meet certain standards. The state Board of Health has been tasked with developing the regulations this year.

Rashti didn't mention second-trimester abortions during his public presentation. Asked after the hearing whether the clinic would perform such procedures if the operating rooms were approved, he said, "As long as I'm CEO, certainly not."

During the public comment, Lew Cabral, who identified himself as a pharmacist, took issue with the application. He said hospital charity programs and government insurance, such as Medicaid, provide for the gynecological surgical health care of low-income women in Hampton Roads.

"Planned Parenthood's request does not address a need in the marketplace," he said.

Many of the speakers voiced opposition to abortion and to Planned Parenthood as a national organization that performs the procedures. Several announced their affiliations with churches or anti-abortion groups.

"Hampton Roads is a Christian, family-based community where people care about each other and the sanctity of human life, which begins at conception," said Cheri Britt, who is with Life Ministries.

A handful of speakers expressed their support for the application.

Margie Rashti, who is married to Dr. Rashti and volunteers for Planned Parenthood, addressed the abortion question head-on.

"We absolutely do early, safe abortion procedures that women themselves choose and ask us to do," she said. "That's not why we're here."

Janine Latus said Planned Parenthood has helped her charity find health care for domestic violence victims with conditions such as breast lumps and sexually transmitted diseases. Local physicians struggle to treat poor, uninsured patients, she said.

"I am 100 percent for their request to expand," she said. "We need Planned Parenthood to take care of the people we're not taking care of."

Amy Jeter, (757) 446-2730, amy.jeter@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

deleted?

It appears my comment that men be held accountable for unplanned children has been deleted. I'm trying to figure out why. Staff member help?
Janine

Well

I don't know why they would delete it, but men should certainly be accountable for their part in any unplanned pregnancy. I believe that child support is firmly in place in most states at least to hold them financially responsible. But are you justifying abortion because some men do not take responsibility? That seems like strange logic.

Men held accountable

I'm saying that you shouldn't be able to require a woman to carry an unplanned pregnancy if the man who also participated in the unprotected sex is not required to give up at least half of his life to raise the child. It's absurd that a pregnancy pushes a woman into poverty while the man walks free. Even if he pays child support it's never enough, and as long as she has to be solely responsible for the child she will struggle terribly to improve her life while his is barely changed.

A few salient points, no matter your view on abortion

1) Anywhere from 15-33% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage, are stillborn, or the infant doesn't survive birth or shortly post partum.
Nature is the most prolific abortionist.

2)Viability of a fetus is considered about 24 weeks, or the beginning of the 3rd trimester. About 1% of all abortions take place then, mostly for medical reasons.

3)About 95% of abortions take place before 15 weeks, long before viability.

The question is: at what point does the state take control of the uterus and who is responsible for a miscarriage or stillborn, particularly if it can be traced to external issues such as chemical pollutants or lifestyle?

Lifestyle, BTW, is not just drugs, but lack of medical care or poverty.

chemical

pollutants? Are you serious? You are justifying induced abortions because of pollution? Wow that is at least original.

You missed the point

and I ran out of character allotment.

There are a lot of reasons for non-induced miscarriage or problems going to term with a pregnancy.

Diet, drugs, environmental issues, radiation, disease, and, of course, nature saying that this fetus is not going to term.

I wasn't justifying abortion because of chemical pollutants.

I was questioning that if the state takes control of the uterus upon fertilization of an egg, how will miscarriage be handled, particularly if there is suspicion of an outside agent being the cause.

It now becomes a "death" that must be investigated.

I think that is a very unintended consequence for those who would outlaw abortion.

No 2nd trimester abortions says Dr. Rashti

Quoting from this article, "Rashti didn't mention second-trimester abortions during his public presentation. Asked after the hearing whether the clinic would perform such procedures if the operating rooms were approved, he said, "As long as I'm CEO, certainly not."

One other little tidbit Dr. Rashti did not mention is this job announcement:

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia is seeking a new President/Chief Executive Officer, based in Virginia Beach.

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia (PPSEV),VABCH

As a Planned Parenthood affiliate,PPSEV must adhere to policies of the national corporate head, Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Planned Parenthood Federation of America has NOT developed and set in place standards of care or protocols for medical conditions such as urinary incontinence surgery or surgical treatments for heavy bleeding. PP affiliates can not just start offering new services on their own. Since they can't offer what they say they will, they'll continue to offer what they already do - abortions AND with outpatient surgical hospital status they will be able to do later term abortions. Google 2nd trimester abortion and see if you support this new service.

Comment deleted

Comment removed for rules violation. Reason: Personal attack, name calling

Funding

Planned Parenthood has received federal funding since 1970, when President Richard Nixon signed into law the Family Planning Services and Population Research Act, amending the Public Health Service Act. Title X of that law provides funding for family planning services, including contraception and family planning information.
Planned Parenthood is also funded by private donors, with a membership base of over 700,000 active donors whose contributions account for approximately one quarter of the organization's revenue. Large donors also contribute a substantial portion of the organization's budget; donors have included the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Buffett Foundation, Ford Foundation, Ted Turner Foundation, the Cullmans and others.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Health rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


Find a HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Doctor or facility name, keyword: i.e., optometrist, dental, home health care
City, State or Zip: i.e., Norfolk, VA or 23510