68°
forecast

Va. Beach Planned Parenthood request gets preliminary denial

Posted to: Health News Virginia Beach

VIRGINIA BEACH

The staff of the Virginia Department of Health has recommended denial of a controversial application submitted by Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia to add two operating rooms to its Newtown Road clinic, according to a report released Thursday.

Among the reasons given for the recommendation: The region already has too many operating rooms; the nonprofit didn't show that its project filled a unique need; and there are "reasonable alternatives" to the proposal.

"We're obviously very disappointed," said Erin Zabel, a Planned Parenthood spokeswoman. "We know that they're needed services because our patients tell us, the people in the community tell us."

The nonprofit's Virginia Beach Health Center was seeking the operating rooms so it could surgically treat conditions such as incontinence, suspicious breast lumps and chronic pelvic pain - particularly for low-income, uninsured women, according to its application.

Anti-abortion activists have expressed concern that the operating rooms would allow the clinic to perform second-trimester abortions. Zabel has said there are no plans to expand services to include the late-term procedures.

The mayors of Newport News and Portsmouth and three state legislators were among those supporting the application. In opposition was the CEO of Bon Secours Hampton Roads Health System, who wrote a letter saying the new operating rooms weren't needed.

In its report, the state health staff agreed that the proposed project would "significantly increase patient financial accessibility to gynecological surgical services for residents... who are low income and medically uninsured or under-insured."

However, the staff wrote that the South Hampton Roads health district already has too many general-purpose operating rooms with 127, including some at facilities required to provide indigent care.

If the Planned Parenthood proposal was approved, the staff estimated an excess of 11 operating rooms by 2016. That number is computed through a mathematical formula dictated by Virginia administrative code.

"Improving access to existing operating rooms is a more economical and efficient alternative to adding capacity," according to the state report.

Planned Parenthood argued that some of those were for specialty surgeries and none were dedicated to gynecologic procedures.

The staff also wrote that the nonprofit didn't demonstrate the need for the operating rooms. It expressed skepticism about Planned Parenthood's estimate of 1,700 to 1,900 surgical cases in each of its first two years, and objected to a prediction that about one-fourth of its surgical patients would come from a neighboring health district.

The nonprofit contended that the district's demand for surgical services was underestimated and that it might see more patients if a new state law more strictly regulating abortion clinics results in the closure of other Planned Parenthood locations.

Rather than equipping new operating rooms, Planned Parenthood could maintain a list of providers who would take new low-income and uninsured patients, the report said.

Zabel said Planned Parenthood hadn't yet decided whether to pursue the application further.

A final decision from the state health commissioner is likely later this year.

Amy Jeter, (757) 446-2730, amy.jeter@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Comment deleted

Comment removed for rules violation. Reason: Racial, ethnic, group attack

Most of these comments are

Most of these comments are dripping with sexism and garbage. I am saddened and disgusted that people in this community are so willing to make these snide comments about women they do not know and will likely never know. To base this discussion on abortion is just dumb. Please go spend a day with a financially struggling woman who suffers from severe pelvic pain but has been turned away from other places for treatment because it is not life threatening. Until she comes in hemorrhaging she’s not considered for treatment. Tell HER that she will just have to suffer with this until she has reached a level of financial security to take care of it via insurance, even then she likely can’t get treatment since it’s a pre-existing condition.

Right-wing social

Right-wing social engineering is no better than Left-wing social engineering...in fact it's much worse.

i just luv these abortion troll stories

the flamewars they generate are hysterical. since you pro choicers are so in favor of genocide calling it choice. want free health care benefits, rights, ad nausea um. why dont we just means test all pregnant women and kill the babies of those the state doesn't deem qualified? just project down the road where this argument goes. ill bet when they decide crawl up your uterus and dispose of your fetus you'd scream they are killing your baby. this is a despicable subject, any argument that winds up with potential human beings in trash bins is barbarous. is it legal? yes. should we outlaw it? no Is this is a good thing? should the government be involved in it? yeah yeah PP is a non profit yada yada. where does there money come from?

What in the world does this

What in the world does this ridiculous comment have to do with this article?

Comment deleted

Comment removed for rules violation. Reason: Personal attack, name calling

I know exactly what this is

I know exactly what this is all about. A woman's uterus is too controversial to have unimpeded access to operating rooms.

Thiss is an obvious attack

Thiss is an obvious attack on PP, but more importantly the reasoning is nonsensical. The fact is the hospitals charge for use of their operating room to any physician. The rates are inflated far beyond the rooms actual value. PP could for far less funding aim for procedure specific OR's which they can own rather than pay the hospital. This is an attack on women and consumers. The cost makes it's way to everyone of us.

Hard to beleive we are talking about this in 2011. It's shameful.

Blaming any one party for this is ignorant.

I

absolutely support this decision. Good for the Department of Health. I'm glad they didn't cave in to political pressure.

The way I see it, that's

The way I see it, that's exactly what they did.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Health rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


Find a HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Doctor or facility name, keyword: i.e., optometrist, dental, home health care
City, State or Zip: i.e., Norfolk, VA or 23510