74°
forecast

Va. inmate's win in suit against government a rarity

Posted to: News

NORFOLK

Rashid Qawi Al-Amin succeeded where thousands of Virginia prison inmates before him have failed: He prevailed in a lawsuit against the government.

Al-Amin won a settlement with the state that forces the prison system to supply him, and the Greensville Correctional Center library, with Muslim reading materials, CDs and DVDs. He'll also receive $2,000.

Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's office decided to settle the seven-year legal battle after a series of court rulings in Al-Amin's favor. The state admitted no wrongdoing in the settlement but did agree to perform eight different acts to satisfy Al-Amin's claims.

The case highlights a trend among state and federal prisoners, many of them converted Muslims, fighting for their rights to practice their faith.

In 1989, Al-Amin, then known as Donald Tracey Jones, was convicted in Norfolk Circuit Court of murder and use of a firearm, and sentenced to 52 years in prison. Police said the shooting was drug-related. Jones, a New York native, was in his early 20s at the time. He's scheduled to be released in 2016.

Not long after entering prison, he changed his name to Rashid Qawi Al-Amin, which in Arabic means "wise, strong and trustworthy." He says the prison system refused to acknowledge his new name.

Al-Amin became part of a swell of converts to Islam within America's prisons. Some joined the Nation of Islam while others chose the Sunni or Shia sects. Al-Amin became a Sunni. Corrections officials sometimes refer to the religion as Prislam.

Through the years, Al-Amin has filed no fewer than 10 state and federal lawsuits challenging his conviction and sentence and fighting for his religious rights; he lost them all except this one. He was part of a lawsuit filed by Muslim inmates challenging the Department of Corrections' grooming policy that prohibits beards. The inmates lost.

Thousands of state and federal prisoners file lawsuits each year, and most are thrown out as frivolous.

Al-Amin filed this religious rights suit in 2004. U.S. District Judge Raymond A. Jackson in Norfolk dismissed it in 2005 on procedural grounds, but the federal appeals court reinstated it. That process alone took three years.

In 2008, Jackson threw the case out again, citing a lack of merit, but the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sent it back to Jackson to hear arguments. The judge offered to appoint a lawyer for Al-Amin, but Al-Amin refused counsel.

Over the next two years, motions were filed back and forth, and another appeal ensued on a minor issue over who exactly should be sued. Late last year, Jackson finally set the case for trial. It was supposed to have begun May 10, but Jackson ordered both sides to try to settle the matter.

The day before trial, he dismissed the suit after receiving the settlement notice.

The settlement calls for the Department of Corrections to spend up to $2,500 on Islamic library materials for the Greensville Correctional Center, where Al-Amin is housed. The department will also hire a Muslim inmate to work in the library. And inmates at Greensville will be allowed to donate religious materials to the library, subject to security review.

Al-Amin was even allowed to submit his own list of Islamic reading materials, movies and CDs.

The department also agreed to allow Al-Amin to use his religious name and to allow inmates to assist in the preparation of religious meals. Finally, the department agreed to pay Al-Amin $2,000 to cover the costs he expended fighting the suit, mostly for filing fees and postage.

Rebecca Kim Glenberg, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia who has represented state prisoners in other legal actions, said it is rare for a prisoner to win a lawsuit or even receive a settlement from the state. She represented Al-Amin and other inmates in the failed suit over the department's grooming policy.

Prisons must follow the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Passed by Congress in 2000, it prohibits government from placing excessively restrictive burdens on inmates to practice their religion.

"Prisons may not substantially burden an inmate's free exercise of religion unless the restriction is necessary to achieve a compelling government interest," Glenberg said.

A compelling government interest, she said, is defined as the highest standard of justification that the government can be required to prove. Typically, that has to do with security or health and safety.

"Courts tend to be very deferential to the prison officials when they say they have a compelling government interest," she said.

A number of religious organizations around the country have been trying to break the stereotypes and fears of Islam, particularly in prison settings - some officials in Washington and TV pundits have railed against the "radicalization" of prison Muslims.

Gary Friedman, communications director for the American Correctional Chaplains Association, called that notion "overblown" and said officials should be more worried about white supremacists in prison.

"It's just been getting more attention because of the attitudes toward Muslims in this nation since 9/11," he said.

Still, Friedman said he was surprised by the outcome of the Al-Amin case.

"That's a terrible settlement. It sets a very bad precedent."

While prisons should allow access to any mainstream religion, he said, officials need to be aware of the separation of church and state.

"Public funds should not be used to purchase sectarian materials," he said.

Larry Traylor, director of communications for the Department of Corrections, declined to discuss the specifics of the Al-Amin case, but he supplied The Virginian-Pilot with the department's rules concerning the practice of religion by inmates.

The department has a Faith Review Committee to review the validity of various religions that are recommended by the institutions to be recognized, he said.

The state Attorney General Office, which defended Greensville and its food service contractor in the case, declined to comment but did provide the newspaper with a copy of the settlement.

Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343, tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Isn't it sweet ...

That even the prison system has entitlement programs set in place to take care of the hobbies and needs of our criminals?

It's adorable. No really, I think it's adorable. I'm thinking of quitting my job, go on SSI because I'm depressed and in severe pain, but not too depressed or hurt to pop out ten kids, and go on welfare.

When the kids get older and I lose some of my disability income, I'll commit a crime so that I can go to jail and enjoy some of my hobbies on the tax payers dime.

Better than winning the lottery!

My Math..Is Fuzzy..

Convicted in 1989 and sentenced to 52 years!

1989 + 52 = 2041

Ohhhh..I get it! He's a Muslim now and he's peaceful!

Ok..yea..I get it now..
...I think!

Islam Reading Material

Well now, this guy to me is only a Muslim as long as he is in jail. When time comes for him to be released,my guess is he will no longer be a Muslim. All of these "lawsuits" filed by convicts,is a waste of the taxpayers money and the Courts time. Next time this thug kills someone, make sure he has his Koran on him, and what it says about the killing of innocents. He gives every good Muslim a bad name by using their faith to hide behind. He only thing he should get is what it says in our Book: An Eye for an eye,tooth for a tooth". However, God said:" Vengeance is mine saith the Lord". Something is wrong with the system when convicts can file lawsuits over and over to tie up our Court system and delay honest citizens form getting justice

I'm sorry you find the rule

I'm sorry you find the rule of law so inconvenient. Perhaps you'd like it better if the police could just try, convict and punish people at the time of their arrest. Heck, we could just throw out all of the laws and let the police sort of make it up as they go along. We could make sure only good christians of the appropriate deonomination, i.e. whichever one YOU practice, could be police. That'd be your nirvana.

As for me, messy as it is, I prefer the rule of law and a system based on indidual rights. But that's just me. I'm an American.

He should get...............

He should be allowed to read the exact same thing his victim gets to read. Which is nothing.

So his new name means "wise,

So his new name means "wise, strong, and trustworthy." Sure. I wonder what the Arabic word for "murdering thug" is?

WHY IS THIS NEWS?

A convicted KILLER makes a point & the VP makes in news?

Where are the CENSORS now?

the real tragedy is that he was sentenced to 52 years in 1989

He was sentenced to 52 years in 1989 and gets out in 2016? I may have a Norfolk education but that math doesn't add up to me. That is the real issue of this story.

lawsuit

a drug dealer gets convicted of murder and changes faith. what is the muslim punishment for dealing drugs and murder? i'm not sure what it is but it probably does not come with $2000 for postage. the true crime is that someone is defending this.

Guilty of...

Murder... he should have been executed. All else is moot.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox