74°
forecast

Petraeus: Blackwater shootings undermined mission

Posted to: Academi - Blackwater Afghanistan Military Norfolk

NORFOLK

Gen. David Petraeus, head of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, told a federal judge here that the shooting deaths of two Afghan civilians by Blackwater contractors undermined the military's mission and weakened the "bond of trust" with Afghans.

Patraeus' statement was included in a letter sent to U.S. District Judge Robert G. Doumar in advance of next week's sentencings of Justin Cannon and Christopher Drotleff.

The former Blackwater arms instructors were convicted in federal court earlier this year of involuntary manslaughter. A jury acquitted them of murder charges.

Drotleff, of Virginia Beach, and Cannon, of Louisiana, shot and killed two Afghans and wounded a third following a traffic accident at an intersection in Kabul in May 2009. They claimed that they fired their weapons in self-defense after a car came at them.

The sentencings on Tuesday are expected to be contentious. The government wants prison time for both men, but their lawyers will argue for probation.

Each side filed typical pre-sentencing position papers. The defense lawyers asked for leniency, citing time already served and acceptance of responsibility for the shootings. Prosecutors said there was no acceptance, and that the two deserve prison time, in part, because of their prior histories of bad behavior. Cannon was caught using cocaine in the Army and was discharged. Drotleff was discharged from the Marines after going AWOL, and has a slew of misdemeanor convictions.

But the letter from Petraeus has thrust the case into a new light. And both sides are wondering how Doumar, who is prone to speaking his mind, will react.

"I think that it's rather unusual that he submitted a letter. I certainly did not expect it, and was surprised that it came," said Norfolk lawyer James Broccoletti, one of Cannon's two attorneys.

While the full letter was not made public, both sides referred to it in their position papers.

Prosecutors quoted from, and paraphrased, the general's letter: "The military mission in Afghanistan was and remains not only to combat insurgents but also to 'enable Afghanistan to secure and govern itself, thereby assuring that Afghanistan is never again a sanctuary for al-Qaida and its affiliates.' "

The letter called the shootings a "setback" that forced military and civilian personnel in Kabul to "overcome adverse U.S. sentiment," and, as a result, our "personnel faced a heightened level of danger as they went about their missions."

Petraeus went on to say that the shootings "put the success of our mission in jeopardy and put the lives of our service members and civilian personnel serving in Afghanistan at risk."

In their pre-sentencing filing, defense attorneys wrote:

"General Petraeus certainly has the right to express his opinion and to submit his views to the court. Mr. Drotleff respectfully disagrees with his conclusion."

Drotleff's "act of self-defense" was about the 100th incident of civilian casualties in the Afghan war, the attorneys said, citing media reports.

"Most recently, in March, nine boys collecting firewood to heat their homes in the eastern Afghanistan mountains were killed by NATO helicopter gunners who mistook them for insurgents," the attorneys told the judge, citing a New York Times article.

Petraeus apologized to the Afghan government, but Afghan President Hamid Karzai rejected the apology, stating that the "people of Afghanistan are tired of these incidents and excuses," the attorneys said, citing another Times story.

Less than two weeks later, forces under Petraeus' command mistakenly killed two more Afghan boys who were watering farm fields, believing that they might be planting a roadside bomb, the lawyers told the judge, citing a Voice of America report.

"To our knowledge, none of these tragic incidents involved malice or ill will by American or NATO troops. Instead, they were unfortunate, and tragic, consequences of war," the attorneys told the judge.

The same should apply to the actions of Drotleff and Cannon, they said.

"I think that it's a tragedy when any civilians are killed in a war zone," Broccoletti said Thursday. "That's the problem with this circumstance. It's a war zone."

Efforts to reach Petraeus or his spokesperson were unsuccessful.

Prosecutors for the U.S. attorney's office declined to comment beyond what's in the filings. Other defense attorneys for Cannon and Drotleff also declined to comment.

Prosecutors have asked the judge to sentence Cannon to 2-1/2 years in prison and to give Drotleff almost 3-1/2 years in prison. The maximum penalty is eight years.

Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343, tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Petraeus is wrong

Patreus,Funny you talk bad about Blackwater now,when They protected you on several occasions. The Afghan WAR is hurting, because YOU hide safely within a secured compound,enjoying your green bean latte~ without the risk of getting killed.Thanks for the Poor decisions on ROE's(rules of engagement) for our soldiers. You should be charged with treason,and accessory to murder for Every soldier that died because he had to follow YOUR rules, instead of fighting the way they are trained to fight,to engage and destroy the enemy.
Thats whats hurting the War, not Blackwater, SHEEP-PEOPLE like you.

Sure is weird

Does anyone else find it weird that a General as high up as him took the time out of his day on his own to write the court a letter? He is a very busy man and the last thing he would like to do is write a letter to the courts. Now isn't it ironic that they have made multiple attempts to reach him and they cant? He is not that hard to find over there and im sure if he was concerned enough to write the letter then he would return the call. Something is fishy

Questions that need answered

Did someone ask the general to comment and if so, who asked him? Was there manipulation behind the scenes to get him to comment on this case? Could it be that the general doesn't like private security forces like Blackwater/Xe?

What happened was a tragedy. That is one point few people disagree on. The question in this case is whether or not it was intentional. I do not doubt this shooting and others did have a negative effect on peace efforts in the area. Any time civilians are killed in operations like this, it is bound to have a negative effect. The battle for the 'hearts and minds' becomes critical to the success of the mission.

It will be interesting to see how Judge Doumar treats this . . .

THESE GUYS ARE NOTHING SHORT OF THUGS

Anytime the criminal element of gung-ho folks like the ones attracted to blackwater-type employment operate under a set of rules that gives them the feeling of being untouchable, they do dumb stuff and then lie about it. They murdered people and need to go to prison. They also put the real heroes, our military, at a disadvantage. I don't know why our govt let them run free in a sovereign jurisdiction with a blank check to do as they pleased. The Afghans could have rightfully labeled them unlawful enemy combatants and taken them into custody.

you obviously have never

you obviously have never been into a "WAR ZONE".

THESE GUYS ARE NOTHING SHORT OF THUGS

Anytime the criminal element of gung-ho folks like the ones attracted to blackwater-type employment operate under a set of rules that gives them the feeling of being untouchable, they do dumb stuff and then lie about it. They murdered people and need to go to prison. They also put the real heroes, our military, at a disadvantage. I don't know why our govt let them run free in a sovereign jurisdiction with a blank check to do as they pleased. The Afghans could have rightfully labeled them unlawful enemy combatants and taken them into custody.

perhaps the general just doesn't like dirtbags

soldiers who were kicked out for using cocaine or going AWOL then hired by mercenary companies like Xe (Blackwater) don't rate very high in my book either. Not only have you shamed your service and your family but you then go on to put GOOD soldiers lives and risk and compromise overall mission success.

all you are hearing is what

all you are hearing is what the news is telling you. Do you really know the truth behind the story? No, neither does the media. It is there job to hype up every story so people will actually read and follow in on them. I have known Mr. Drotleff for some time now and what the media is making him look out to be is rediculous because that is not how he is

History of such cases

It is rare, very rare for officers outside of a court case to directly comment on them and have those comments sent to the courts. That is what makes this so odd and newsworthy. That is why it would be interesting to know who asked for his comment, emotions running wild aside.

Hiring Criteria

Cannon was caught using cocaine in the Army and was discharged. Drotleff was discharged from the Marines after going AWOL, and has a slew of misdemeanor convictions.
You can get paid high six figures with a background like this? I wouldn't let these guys flip burgers!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Afghanistan rss feed    Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features