Rep. Walter Jones, 9 others sue Obama over Libya strikes

By Reid J. Epstein

The fight over presidential authority in the military conflict in Libya reached a tipping point Wednesday, morphing from an academic discussion over the War Powers Resolution to a serious challenge to President Barack Obama’s authority to keep U.S. forces involved in the NATO-led air bombings of the North African dictatorship.

A day after House Speaker John Boehner declared Obama would soon be in violation of the 1973 War Powers Resolution, a bipartisan coalition of 10 members of Congress sued the president and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, arguing they are violating the law. The turn of events sent the White House scrambling to respond; the administration released a report justifying its actions in legal and military terms.

The rift marks the first major foreign policy dispute between the Republican-controlled House and the Democratic White House. Formerly hawkish Republicans, now focused on the burgeoning national debt, are demanding Obama explain his actions abroad in a way Democrats once asked of his predecessor.

In the White House report released Wednesday evening, Obama told Congress that American forces have a supporting role, with responsibility for air attacks left to European and Canadian forces.

Of the report’s 32 pages, only one is dedicated to the administration’s legal argument behind Obama’s decision to intervene in Libya. The report says U.S. forces are not the type of “hostilities” covered in the War Powers Resolution.

The report states the Defense Department “does not plan” to seek more funds for the Libya effort. The report says military action has cost U.S. taxpayers $715 million through June 3 and estimated it will cost $1.1 billion through the end of September.

The report also lists instances when the administration provided information to Congress about the conflict, cost, motivation for committing troops to Libya, progress since March by NATO-led forces and a description of the 45-member council representing the opposition to dictator Muammar Qadhafi.

Earlier in the day, two senior administration officials asserted that Obama has legal authority under the War Powers Resolution to conduct American military operations in Libya, despite the lack of congressional authorization.

“We’re not engaged in any of the activities that typically, over the years in war powers analysis, is considered to constitute ‘hostilities’ within the meaning of the statute,” one of the officials said. “We’re not engaged in sustained fighting. There’s been no exchange of fire with hostile forces. We don’t have troops on the ground. We don’t risk casualties to those troops. None of the factors, frankly, speaking more broadly, has risked the sort of escalation that Congress was concerned would impinge on its war-making power.”

The White House did not directly respond to a lawsuit filed by 10 House members. The suit, led by anti-war Reps. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) and Walter Jones (R-N.C.), argued that Obama illegally circumvented Congress.

“There is a body of law here developed over time that we’ve obviously looked at very closely,” one official said. “On any distinction between the spirit and the letter of the resolution, we’re comfortable we’re complying with both.”

Reaction on Capitol Hill was muted.

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), a close Obama ally, called congressional approval “essential” for the Libya mission.

“There are others among us who have — for more than 25 years — held the position that the War Powers Act is the law of the land. When we are engaged in military activity that is not defensive in nature, … congressional approval is essential.”

Boehner spokesman Brendan Buck said the speaker will review the report and said he hopes it augurs more communication from the White House about the Libya effort.

“The commander in chief has a responsibility to articulate how U.S. military action is vital to our national security and consistent with American policy goals,” Buck said. “With Libya, the president has fallen short on this obligation.”

A spokesman for Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.) declined to comment.

While Qadhafi remains in power, the officials said the air offensive on Libya has made progress in the past two months. Before the U.S. and NATO launched the no-fly zone, Qadhafi’s forces were threatening to go “house to house” in major cities to fight the rebels, the officials said.

“Civilian lives have been saved,” one official said. “Qadhafi’s advancement has been stopped. The opposition has been given time and space to organize.”

White House spokesman Jay Carney reiterated Wednesday during a press briefing that Obama will not send ground troops to Libya.

“He will send no ground troops to Libya,” Carney said. “After an initial phase — days, not weeks, as he said, as he promised — the United States stepped back from its lead role in the Libya mission, turned over lead responsibility to NATO and has been in a support mission ever since.”

The senior administration officials also responded to the contention from Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann during the Monday GOP presidential candidates’ debate that some members of the Libyan opposition are associated with Al Qaeda. The Transitional National Council, which the officials said is poised to lead a transition to self-rule once Qadhafi loses power, is a “legitimate interlocutor” and “represents a far better future for the Libyan people than the Qadhafi regime.”

Earlier, Kucinich iterated his contention that Obama and Gates broke the law by committing U.S. troops to the conflict.

“With regard to the war in Libya, we believe that the law was violated. We have asked the courts to move to protect the American people from the results of these illegal policies,” Kucinich said.

But the lawsuit is not likely to get far in federal court, said former Rep. David Skaggs (D-Colo.), co-chairman of the Constitution Project’s War Powers Committee. Skaggs called the Kucinich suit “right on the merits” but certain to be dismissed on procedural grounds because courts have determined members of Congress do not have standing to file such suits.

Manu Raju contributed to this report.

Posted to: Nation - World News Politico North Carolina

How to be civil in comments:

 No name-calling, personal insults or threats. No attacks based on race, gender, ethnicity, etc. No writing with your Caps Lock on – it's screaming. Keep on topic and under 1500 characters. No profanity or vulgarity. Stay G- or PG-rated. Read the full rules here.

Thank Ron Paul

Truly amazing how much the presence of Ron Paul in the last two presidential elections has influenced the debate and discussion of constitutional issues in the United States. This suit doesn't happen, or get traction, if not for the Republican from the 14th district in Texas.

Our mission in Libya

The mission is Libya is in support of a NATO operation to save a country from a nutcase dictator. Who cares what Kucinich thinks?

war for oil

President Obama is conducting this kinetic action to steal the oil from the people of Libya.
Everyone knows that Ghadaffi was not involved in 9/11 and was no longer trying to develop WMDs.

Let's hope that no NATO forces or Americans are killed. Let's also pray that those "rebels" are not the worser guys (Ghadaffi was a bad guy, a really bad guy).

Do you even know anything

Do you even know anything about Libya and their "nutcase dictator?"

In 2003, Qadafi and the Libyan government stopped supporting terrorism and dismantled their WMD programs.

They are highly educated people who enjoy a high standard of living. They have a history of sending students abroad. In the early 80's, there was a few thousand studying in America, but that number dropped due to sanctions imposed by the United States. The sanctions were being lifted because of Qadafi's stance against terrorism in 2003.

This failing military action against Libya is about one thing, OIL!

If there ever is a civil uprising in the United States of this magnitude, you think our government is not going to send in the National Guard? You honestly think i

Oil is right

It is not even our oil. It is oil for Europe. US imports very little oil from Libya but Europe imports a lot which the political unrest has disrupted the flow. There is a ripple affect on all. European demand spreads to our sources, etc. This is not an action to defend American interest. It is an action to defend European interest. My question if this is about being humaritarian what about other countries:

- Egypt
- Syria
- Saudia Arabia
- Iran
- North Korea
- Sudan
- Other countries in Africa

It is really about money....

Understand that it is support Freedom

Got it, the US is here to save the world. It is not up to the President to decide to wage war. He has violated the War Powers Act and the US Constitution.

I do not have a problem with a President acting in the best interest of the US but Congress holds the checks and balance to make sure that is true.

President Obama has been smug and clearly has not come to Congress for a vote to continue military operations.

Even though I disagree with the War Powers Act (war should have been declared, you cannot use President Bush on this one. He came to Congress in the appropriate time limits and requested authorization to continue war in Afghanistan and Iraq. The resolutions were pass by Congress.

President Obama has not done the same!

and what is the punishment?

What is the punishment for violating the Constitution? Bush and Cheney were found guilty of it and are still out and about enjoying life and collecting big bucks. Unless there is jail time for someone the document is meaningless.

Funny thing is

For someone who "claims" to be a Constitutional Lawyer.He sure know little about it.This sunday will mark the third month of out involvement in Libya.And yet he still has not asked Congress for a Declaration.Worse yet the Lame GOP and whats left of the Incompetent Dems. Have'nt even raised a flag over this.Except!For people like Ron Paul. SERIOUS QUESTION.Do any of you folks get sick and tired the Two parties that do nothing but Blame each other and spend this Nation into a near fatal Coma,and feel content to think that Government is the Solution to your lifes issues.think again. They like Americans fighting and arguing over who's Party serves us Better.The Welfare Party,or the Warefare Party.

Libya is not a Hostile Enemy

Libya is not a threat to the United States so why are we dropping bombs on these people. North Korea is a threat. Iran is a threat. Yet, we ignore the real threats and go after the ones with no military. President Obama needs to know he is not a dictator and the Constitution does not permit him to go around destroying countries that pose no threat. Our Congress needs to take action and they need to take immediate action. This senseless invasion on this country needs to stop. Also, Bin Laden in dead. Bring our troops home from Afghanistan and Iraq. Maybe they would like to play a little golf and a have a few cold drinks afterwards.

Waste of resources

When did the suit against the Bush administration finally get adjudicated? Like last year, and who went to jail, paid fines or saw their careers fall? NO ONE!!! It will be 3 years before this winds through the courts and Libya will be a distant memory. I also seem to remember that it was these same Republicans that were complaining that Obama wasn't moving fast enough to support the revolutionaries in Libya just a couple of months back. Is there no consistency or truth in DC?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

Daily Deal |  | Promote your business