72°
forecast

No criminal charges to be filed in Norfolk no-show case

Posted to: Local Government News Norfolk

NORFOLK

No one will be charged with criminal wrongdoing in the case of a Community Services Board employee who collected $320,000 in pay and benefits over 12 years but did not show up for work.

"This office will not initiate criminal charges in the matter," Commonwealth's Attorney Greg Underwood wrote in a short letter hand-delivered to acting Police Chief Sharon Chamberlin on Wednesday evening.

"While the detailed and in-depth criminal investigation by the Norfolk Police Department does raise questions about prior management operations of the NCSB," he wrote, "the evidence obtained does not support pursuing a criminal prosecution against Jill McGlone or any NCSB employee."

McGlone was suspended from the Community Services Board in 1998 but continued to be paid until May 2010, when her status was discovered by Maureen Womack, the agency's executive director, city officials have said.

Womack fired or forced out five employees because of the scandal, which she said she discovered during a routine review of the agency's personnel roster. At the time, Womack had been in her position for about 18 months.

CSB and city officials have said they have no idea why McGlone was paid. Underwood did not address the subject in his letter. When asked whether investigators discovered why McGlone was paid, Amanda Howie, a spokeswoman for Underwood, said "the letter speaks for itself."

Mayor Paul Fraim also declined to comment, saying to do so about a criminal investigation would be "inappropriate."

Others expressed frustration that more than a year after the no-show worker was discovered, the question of why she was paid remains unanswered.

City Councilman Tommy Smigiel said he is certain that Underwood would have prosecuted if there was enough evidence.

"But I find it hard to believe there was no fraud involved, that there was no criminal wrongdoing," he said.

"People just aren't talking. It's very frustrating."

City Manager Marcus Jones did not return a phone call made to his office Wednesday evening.

With an annual budget of $24 million, the CSB provides thousands of the city's poorest residents with psychiatric and drug abuse services.

Womack said that after discovering McGlone's status, she informed the agency's board of directors and City Attorney Bernard Pishko, whose office provides legal advice to the CSB. Pishko conducted a four-month investigation that resulted in a handful of employees being forced out.

CSB officials contend that McGlone was suspended in April 1998 because she was accused of bringing a weapon onto agency property. While on suspension, a woman named Toni Rae Harris sued McGlone and the CSB, saying McGlone had disclosed confidential medical information about her.

Harris, who has died, dropped the lawsuit in 2000. The attorney for Brenda Wise, the agency's former director of administration, has said that McGlone's suspension was a systemic failure "that got lost in the administrative shuffle."

Howie said Underwood was unaware of Pishko's investigation into the no-show worker until he read about it Aug. 26 in The Virginian-Pilot. A police investigation was requested by the city on Sept. 8, Howie said.

According to two sources familiar with the investigation, Womack told the police that information appeared to have been removed from a CSB file kept on McGlone. The sources asked not to be identified because they are unauthorized to speak.

Womack declined to comment when contacted by email. McGlone could not be reached.

Councilman Andy Protogyrou, a defense attorney, said civil lawsuits may eventually reveal why McGlone was paid.

"Depositions are being taken," he said. "Hopefully, we will learn why this happened."

Three of the employees fired or forced to resign - Anthony Crisp, Linda Berardi and Laurie Paquin - have filed defamation lawsuits against Womack and the CSB. They say they repeatedly asked about McGlone's status.

Fraim's law firm has been hired by Scottsdale Insurance, which provides liability insurance to the agency, to defend the agency in the three lawsuits.

Pishko's office has sued Crisp, Berardi, Wise, former CSB director George Pratt and McGlone on behalf of the CSB, seeking repayment of the money McGlone received.

In a response to the CSB's lawsuit against her, McGlone said in a court document that she was not allowed to return to work, even after Wise told her she would be reinstated.

"It was Wise who assured McGlone that everything... was in order and Wise told McGlone to fill out the necessary paperwork to receive her benefits and wages," McGlone's response says. "McGlone then took it upon herself to try and return to the job."

The Norfolk office of the FBI has investigated but would not say whether its work is complete.

"We would decline to comment, just following standard Department of Justice policy," Peter Carr of the U.S. attorney's office said.

Although the CSB is appointed by the City Council and the city handles its payroll and Pishko's office provides legal advice, technically it is not a part of city government. City Manager Jones has established a committee to determine whether it should be brought under city control.

Fraim believes it should.

"The issue here is that the city needs to gain greater control," he said.

Smigiel said regardless of the agency's current status, "Ultimately, this is our responsibility, because we appoint the CSB board.

"We need to be held accountable."

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

Patrick Wilson, (757) 222-3893, patrick.wilson@pilotonline.com

 

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Try again

I'll see if I can remember what I put in the "vindicated" article that went suddenly from open status to registered commenters only.
Anyway. My comment was I would like to think I would have put the money into a separate bank account, knowing there would eventually be an accounting. However, it is possible that this was her only source of income. With that status, she could not draw unemployment. At least she was honest enough not to try that. A second job would have made for a very complicated tax situation. All the info I have read has led me to believe she did everything she was told to do, wanted to go back to work and was told not to. I think I would have been frustrated enough to say If that's the way they want it, sobeit!

Addemdum:

Anybody remember thay oldElvis Presley movie "Follow That Dream", where he (Elvis) was classified 100% disabled by the Army, and his older relative (I forget the relationship) insisted he keep it that way? "The government says you're disabled, who are you to argue?"
This is a similar situation. "Authority is always right"

WHY DONT PEOPLE GET IT????????

How can people not understand what went on.....The people in the KNOW know this was a settlement that they tried to keep quiet from the public. It just went on to long and they didnt know how to end it..Anybody guess why no charges and the city wants to quietly move pass this now.......

RE: people were forced from their jobs...now, this?!

What happened to the several people who were forced out of their jobs over this debacle? What about their reputations? What about the jobs they held and lost? These people are the ones who have been truly damaged by this mess. They are the ones who deserve some sort of apology. The sense of entitlement in Norfolk runs in so many directions, it's hard to sort out all the "deserving" parties here. And that is the biggest problem of all, folks. And, even worse, it appears just about everywhere in this particular community.

Sorry yet I Told ya so

I knew this woman would never be charged because she did nothing wrong. She didn't rob and she didn't embezzle. She was gainfully employed and it's not her fault that her employer did not follow up with culling the payroll and benefits. The organization was quasi-governmental and all their funding comes from arguing for their budget.

It's perfect

I love this kind of stuff. A worker gets paid for 12 yrs without showing up for work. Sounds good so far. The employer is stoking a paycheck twice a month for someone who must be doing a pretty important job. The people responsible are given a pass. Whatever investigations are being hopelessly blocked because someone won't talk to them? Is that right?

I'm telling you, this is how The Mafia operates. This Godfather 4. Don's control the captains, wiseguys. The cops jump on The Tide looking for scofflaws. And nobody knows anything.

It don't get no better than this.

More inept civic management

12 years of pay, no show at work?
And no one is held accountable.
Typical bureaucratic, non-responsible, pass the buck situation.
Why aren't heads rolling? Because these people are accountable to no one in a meaningful way.
Until/unless that changes, stand by for more.

Into Perspective

Does this rise to the level of what's gone on at HRT? $300 thousand versus $100 million?

awol with benefits

It appears , the employee was suspended for alledgedly bringing a weapon to work.While on suspension,with pay and benefits, she was sued for disclosing personal information - a charge that was later dropped.Someone ,after the weapon investigation was completed, failed to tell her to return to work.She was probably told - we'll call you when the investigation is finished and you can return to work -- NO CALL -- That's just my humble opinion.

McGlone - no criminal charges FOR FRAUD?

Perhaps we should instead be wondering what "dirt" McGlone has on city officials? That is the only reason I can think of for the STAND-DOWN of everybody responsible for this fiasco. From my own personal observations of Tidewater law enforcement, murders are laughed at - but if you MISS YOUR COURT DATE (FOR EVEN MINOR INFRACTIONS) NOW THIS IS TAKEN VERY SERIOUSLY! So... city officials who are dropping the ball here on proceedings, ah - what DO YOU have to hide that might come out if we scrutinize long enough?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Local Government rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


FIND US ON FACEBOOK