The Virginian-Pilot
©
WASHINGTON
U.S. Sens. Jim Webb and Mark Warner introduced legislation Wednesday that would speed up the timetable for natural gas and oil exploration off Virginia's coast and expand the state's share of offshore territory.
The bill also would require that half of future government revenues from offshore drilling be allocated directly to the state government or spent by federal officials on conservation efforts, transportation improvements and alternative energy projects in Virginia.
The two Democrats' proposal goes further in seeking a larger share for Virginia from offshore resources than a House measure co-sponsored by two Hampton Roads congressmen. However, the plan will face strong opposition from other federal lawmakers who oppose sharing federal oil and gas revenues with select states and from environmental activists who say offshore drilling is too risky.
If approved, the Webb-Warner bill would require that the sale of oil and gas leases for areas off Virginia's coast be included in a 2012-2017 federal plan. The Virginia sales were expected to begin this year but were put on hold by President Barack Obama's administration until at least 2017 in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill last year in the Gulf of Mexico.
"Opening up and expanding Virginia's offshore resources to responsible natural gas and oil exploration holds significant promise for boosting needed domestic energy production, while bolstering the commonwealth's economy," Webb said in announcingthe bill, called the Virginia Outer Continental Shelf Energy Production Act of 2011.
Warner said, "This legislation jump-starts a multiyear process that will include responsible environmental reviews, close consultations with NASA and our military partners in Hampton Roads, and this process will include multiple public hearings."
Their bill appears to more than double the size of the area off the coast that would be Virginia's share of the planning area. Under the current federal map, Virginia has a relatively small triangular area that extends about 50 miles off the Eastern Shore.
Ken Salazar, secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, said during a visit to Norfolk last week that North Carolina's offshore planning area "seems to be a little bit big" compared with Virginia's but declined to comment on whether it was fair division.
"I don't know what it would take to change it," Salazar said.
If Congress were to approve speeding up offshore exploration and give Virginia a larger planning area, supporters could have a much tougher fight persuading lawmakers to give the state a big cut of revenues from future oil and gas.
The billions of dollars in annual federal royalties from offshore drilling are a major source of Washington's revenues. Opponents, including legislators from inland states, say the offshore resources belong to the entire country, not coastal states.
Warner acknowledged the royalty sharing will be a tough sell but said it's critical for Virginia to get a share, noting that the precedent has already been set with the Gulf states. "What's good for the goose is good for the gander," he said.
The Virginia senators' plan, if adopted, would be similar to successful 2006 legislation that approved sharing federal royalties from lucrative oil wells far out into the Gulf of Mexico. Four states - Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi and Texas - began collecting 37.5 percent of royalties from Gulf wells in federal waters.
Webb and Warner's bill would allocate the same percentage to Virginia and direct the president to spend an additional 12.5 percent of revenues on federal projects in the commonwealth.
The proposal was praised by Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican, who successfully pushed for a state law last year that requires that most revenues from offshore drilling be used to fix the state's transportation system.
If approved, offshore drilling "will help move our nation closer to energy independence, while bringing much-needed jobs and revenue to the commonwealth," McDonnell said.
But Glen Besa, director of Virginia's Sierra Club chapter, contended the drilling could irreparably harm the region's environment.
"We really need Sens. Warner, Webb, and Gov. McDonnell to provide leadership in supporting an energy policy that invests in efficiency, renewable energy and clean energy jobs," Besa said. "Drilling off our coast will not reduce the price of gas and will only prolongour dependency on foreign oil."
Warner said there will be ample protection and safeguards put in place during the seven-year process before oil and gas production could begin.
The senator said offshore drilling is part of a broader approach to developing new sources of energy.
"Our economy and national security will be strengthened by an 'all-of-the-above' approach to energy, including the expanded production of our own domestic energy resources," Warner said.
Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com


Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
37.5% of revenues
I wonder if each state, AL, MI, LA and TX, paid 37.5% of fed+state, combined gov't spending for the cleanup/mgmt of the Deepwater Horizon mess. If any state gets that share of revenues, it should also contribute, at least, that share of cleanup/mgmt costs when a disaster strikes.
I vote for windpower, and not for more oil company $$ in the pockets of our politicians.
Virginia Offshore Drilling
The inititive sent forward by Senator Webb is excellent for the citizens and statehood of Virginia. The initiative is long over due. The offshore oil exploration will bring revenue and employment opportunities to a state that needs both. The people in opposition to developing the the continental shelf for oil production need to weigh the benefits to state infrastructure (better roads and schools, decrease taxes, increased property value, and more small business employment opportunities). Related jobs: helicopter pilots, mechanics, boat captains, engineers, personnel support, medical support, truck drivers, and fuel handlers to name a few. Expanded small businesses could flourish to provide cheaper rail, helicopter and airplane fares.
Offshore Drilling is Wrong for Virginia
The small amounts of oil and gas estimated to be in the Mid- and South Atlantic are NOT wroth the tremendous risk to the region's coastal communities, rich fisheries, clean beaches, and other natural resources. Offshore wind and other renewable resources have a much greater potential for energy generation without the risks of offshore drilling. The U.S. Minerals Management Service estimates the ENTIRE Atlantic coast holds only about 6 months' supply of oil. Of that, the proposed Virginia lease sale holds just 6 DAYS' supply of oil and only 18 DAYS' supply of gas. Even if production started today, it wouldn't impatc the domestic oil and gas prices until the year 2030! This is hurtful to the ocean life and our lives. Go wind power! www.oceana.or
Wind Energy
Reducing our dependence on foreign oil is not nearly enough to solve our energy problem. VA has the shore line needed to obtain energy, but instead of offshore drilling we should invest money & technology into offshore wind. Investing in a non-renewable source of energy used to make sense before other technology was available. That is not the case anymore. Wind energy has untapped potential for both economic and environmental reasons. By investing in wind over drilling, we would be creating green jobs now, and would secure jobs and a reliable energy source well into the future by taking the lead in this industry. Bob McDonnell wants VA to be the Energy Capital of the East Coast, let’s take it further and become the Clean Energy Capital.
Drill in the vast reserves found in the western part of the US.
Reports have been written stating that there is more than enough oil in the western part of the country to satisfy our needs for years and years to come. It's safer to drill on land, and cheaper. Also, place large export taxes on any oil (and related products) sent out of the country, and use that money to develop alternate energy sources. Also, eliminate further development of the E-15 ethanol. Reports are that vehicles older than 2002 may not be able to use it. (I can't see how ethanol can be considered "renewable." It is developed from corn, primarily, each year. Corn isn't renewable. It's planted every year. Plus, reports show that using ethanol reduces mpg and power of the vehicles. What's the advantage?)
Main one-
"Plus, reports show that using ethanol reduces mpg and power of the vehicles. What's the advantage?"
It provides subsidies to people like a certain congresswoman's family, and that's important.
Wind Farms not Oil
Why can't we put money into wind farms off the Virginia coast? There's no reason why we shouldn't tap into this resource. Wind farms can't accidentally leak thousands of barrels of oil, endanger wildlife, and bring fishing and tourism to a screeching halt. The Gulf still hasn't fully recoved from the BP spill. How soon we forget.
Wind farms kill birds.
Wind farms kill birds.
Proper placement is key
would need to be placed outside of the Atlantic flyway. Offshore wind farms do not kill many birds and no bats.
Proper placement is key
would need to be placed outside of the Atlantic flyway. Offshore wind farms do not kill many birds and no bats.