68°
forecast

Study stresses threat Norfolk faces from flooding

Posted to: Environment Local Government News Norfolk

NORFOLK

When Deborah Miller bought her Colonial Place home almost 30 years ago, she had no idea that nor’easters and hurricanes would leave her with property damages totaling $100,000.

She raised her furniture on blocks, moved her car to higher ground and watched as water inched up through her floor vents.

Hurricane Isabel sent 21 inches of water into the yard in 2003. The last nor’easter was even worse, she said.

A recent study by an environmental group has highlighted a reality Miller – and city officials – know all too well:

Without an extensive levee system, Norfolk could be mostly underwater in less than 90 years.

The report by the Natural Resources Defense Council is just another example of why the city needs to start taking serious action now, said Skip Stiles, executive director of Wetlands Watch, a Norfolk-based environmental group.

“You can see the impacts now,” he said. “It’s going to keep getting worse and worse.”

City officials acknowledge the need for a long-term solution to flooding but say it will be at least a year before they can apply for the necessary federal funding and even longer before major improvements could begin.

Alice Kelly, assistant director of Norfolk Public Works, said the delay isn’t due to a lack of concern.

“These things take time, and we need good data and studies,” she said. “In the meantime, we’re doing what we can to fix drainage and help folks.”

The city’s annual budget for fixing neighborhood flooding problems is about $3 million, Kelly said.

To manage temporary flooding from rain, the city tries to maintain its extensive drainage systems. But when precipitation flooding and tidal flooding coincide, as in a nor’easter, the same pipes that should carry rainwater out bring tidewater in.

In May, public works officials told the City Council that serious improvements in flood management would cost $130 million to $260 million.

Fugro Consultants Inc., a Netherlands-based firm hired by the city in 2007 to come up with a plan for flooding, suggested the city invest in development requirements – like minimum heights for garages – public education and costly infrastructure improvements such as flood walls and pump stations.

Over the years, several neighborhoods – the Hague, Pretty Lake, Mason Creek, Spartan Village and Ohio Creek – have been hit hard by flooding.

In East Ocean View, Fugro’s study estimated that 7,737 homes and businesses are affected by flooding. In the Mason Creek area, the number is 6,293.

Flooding at the Hague, which could cost $50 million to $100 million to fix, affects 1,512 properties. In Ohio Creek and Spartan Village, the study estimates that 584 properties have felt the effects of flooding. Residents there have lost their cars, furniture and possessions, and have endured rotting drywall and electrical short-circuiting.

In the past, Kelly said, Norfolk was able to secure $3.5 million in federal funds to help raise homes over the course of 10 years. Homeowners share some of the cost, she said. So far, the city has raised about 25 properties, including Miller’s.

Miller had to move out of her house while it was raised about 4 feet, but the peace of mind was worth it, she said. It was high enough to stop about 24 inches of water from coming into her home in the 2009 nor’easter.

“It was just such a relief,” she said.

Norfolk has secured hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal funding through Federal Emergency Management Agency grants in the past, but the money is available only after the state declares an emergency.

The previous money spent by the city and secured through grants for flooding pales in comparison to the amount needed now. However, applying for hundreds of millions of dollars takes time, Kelly said.

The city is conducting a study to better determine how much Fugro’s proposals would cost. Kelly said her department is trying to get the Army Corps of Engineers to fund some of the study, which could take a year to complete and is the first step in applying for federal funds.

Stiles said he knows preventive measures to handle flooding and sea level rise will be “whoppingly expensive,” but “the cost of doing nothing is astronomical.”

He points to insurance companies refusing to write new policies in the region and an upcoming Department of Defense study looking into the vulnerability of the Navy to sea-level rise.

“There’s a whole lot at stake for Hampton Roads,” he said.

Sarah Hutchins, (757) 446-2326, sarah.hutchins@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Norfolk's Flood Plans

Thank you Norfolk Planning Dept. They approved many of these money projects in these flood-prone areas and now taxpayers are having to pay to save these private owners. Whoever approved Willoughby Spit should have their heads examined. It's a land mass made by a massive hurricane and one day it will be returned to the river, taking the high rise condos on it with it. History has proven it before and it will prove it again. The Norfolk Planning Dept. approved the project and many of the other apartment projects in Downtown Norfolk without looking at any of the flood plane maps of the past 200 years thinking that our antiquated systems can handle what Mother Nature can dish out. Oh well, taxpayers can always cover the tab, can't they?

anyone hear of j-traps?

Since part of the problem is the storm water pipes flood backwards during flooding conditions, it seems that if Public Works puts huge J-traps in the pipes going to the bay. The pumps would pump over the J-trap and out but not back.

Missed something in the translation

Since part of the problem is the storm water pipes flood backwards during flooding conditions, it seems that if Public Works puts huge J-traps (obviously upside down) in the pipes going to the bay the tidewater would not flood the city through the storm water pipes during extra high tide. The pumps would pump over the J-trap and out but not back.

Big News Flooding in Norfolk

This "News" is nothing new; and it still didn't stop the Light Rail developers from building a system to run at ground level. Can't wait to see the damage this will cause to the train to no where.

who comissioned this study?

The article does not say who paid for this study and why. Did someone just decide lets do a study in Norfolk or was this organized and paid for by the city or some other organization? This article makes it sound like this study was city sponsered but the NRDC is pretty much an agenda driven enviromental organization so I am confused.
" (NRDC), one of the nation's leading environmental organizations, which uses law and science and the support of more than 1.2 million members and activists nationwide to protect the planet's wildlife and wild places and to ensure a safe and healthy environment for all living things. NRDC's priorities include curbing global warming" (from their website)

Date with Irene Saturday Night

Get ready for Hurricane Irene to stop by this weekend. Very good chance we may see our first hurricane of 2011 after it left Puerto Rico today and will be due east of Miami on Thursday.

Storm Damage

Just see how much damage the "Tide" does to your pocketbook.....

I'll explain it for you

Because the Tide is at ground level and the whole article is about making things high so they are not damaged by floods. A comment about two above even comes out and says this. So it is relevant because the commentator is saying flood damage will cost the city money because the Tide is at ground level (he or she even affirms this with the title of her comment).

Once Again....

Valuable funds spent on a study that a sixth grader could have constructed. This is along the same lines as the expert, multi-million dollar study to tell us that the HRBT traffic really is bad. Did we really need to spend money on a flippin' study to tell us, yes, Norfolk actually does flood?!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    Local Government rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


FIND US ON FACEBOOK