The Virginian-Pilot
©
As you've heard, starting Sunday we'll make some changes in The Pilot. To save money, we'll eliminate and combine sections and cut a few other pages. In the Opinion section, we will cut one page on both Sunday and Monday.
We'll do some rearranging and adjusting in Forum on Sunday. On Monday, we'll do entirely without an op-ed page. We'll do our best to keep what's most important and to make these changes in the smartest way we can.
We will remain the source of the best commentary in Hampton Roads. Over the coming weeks, we'll add online features, including an editorial blog at PilotOnline.com.
But there's no hiding the fact that we will lose a few features from the newspaper. And I suspect you won't like it any more than I do. These aren't happy changes. But they are necessary in these unhappy times.
You've already heard from Publisher Maurice Jones and Editor Denis Finley. Let me add a few things, by way of explanation.
Newspapers are coping with two intertwined issues:
One is this awful recession. As long as I've been in this business, economic downturns have always hit hard in the newsroom. Never this hard, though. I've never seen a recession like this one.
And as long as I've been in this business, too, newspapers have emerged slowly from economic troubles. The Pilot has been doing that for 150 years. We'll do it again.
Second, the business itself is changing. Technology has transformed every job in America. Gathering the news and writing opinions aren't that much different. In fact, we have new tools that can make us better, faster, more accurate.
But technology has radically altered how we deliver news and opinion. Thirty years ago, you could read The Pilot any way you wanted, so long as it was on paper. You can now get us on your phone or pad or computer. In fact, across all media, we have more readers today than we've ever had.
But the enterprise of news - the dollars and cents - is mutating, and that makes the business much more challenging.
Newspapers have always made money selling advertisements and the newspaper. Companies made so much money that way, in fact, that they could afford to build things like weather channels.
As some news and information has migrated to the Internet, so has part of our business, disrupting the usual flow of dollars and cents. Advertisements are not nearly as lucrative online, and the news itself is free. You see the problem.
This isn't about newspapers, especially. With a few notable exceptions, it's hard right now to make money providing information online. Or enough to support an enterprise as big as The Pilot.
The Internet has been ubiquitous for only a decade and a half. I suspect the advertising and subscription models online will change, as they already have.
In the meantime, The Pilot has to cut costs to make ends properly meet. Over the next few months, people at The Pilot will lose their jobs. The newsroom will be smaller in January than it was the January before. Pages will be cut all through the newspaper. We'll watch every penny even more carefully.
I hope, with all my heart, that this recession ends soon. I hope, too, that the economy of the Internet will begin to adequately respect and reward the creators of content critical to our lives.
As a matter of course, I hope that both of those things happen sooner rather than later. In the meantime, I'll make sure you know how we're doing and what we're doing to adapt and compete.
If I can answer any questions or concerns, you can reach me at the email address at the top of the editorial page; by mail at 150 W. Brambleton Ave., Norfolk 23510; or by phone at (757) 446-2251.
Donald Luzzatto is The Pilot's editorial page editor.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Decline in Education and the Media
I see intellectual decline in media and education. PC is killing both. Truth would be a better business model. Here's something I published last week, some of it inspired by the Pilot:
“Thomas Jefferson said we can be free or ignorant, not both. So we are plainly in a perilous state. I think it’s easy to see that our Education Establishment has been very ingenious at coming up with techniques for watering-down and dumbing-down. The part I can’t figure out is why do Americans put up with this malfeasance? Why doesn’t the Republican Party make education a BIG issue? Why doesn’t every local election turn on who will improve the schools? Why don’t military and business leaders put loud and relentless pressure on the schools to do a better job? Why doesn’t every newspaper in the country raise a ruckus about dumb schools? (Newspapers need readers. Where is it written that newspapers have to conspire in their own destruction?) Why aren’t people yelling: we’re mad as hell and we won’t take it anymore? Meanwhile, the Education Establishment goes blandly on, playing undertaker to American civilization. If these people were as good at teaching as they are at non-teaching, we would have a new Golden Age.”
The Pilot never explains why kids can't read, can't count, and don't know anything. That's dumb from a business POV.
Bruce Deitrick Price
Improve-Education.org
HORRORS
No editorial page on Monday to exhort Congress to raise taxes.
Jim is on target, however,
I thought the editor wrote a very candid assessment and deserves praise for laying out the bleak economic issues impacting this industry, which is consistent with other newspapers around the country as readership, circulation and advertising revenue continue to erode. James did an admirable job disclosing the fact that the Pilot's news staff has often rendered opinions that were more attentive to being politically correct than investigating political malfeasance & exposing wrong doing. Its important to note that the Pilot clearly has its share of gifted writers within their editorial board, and news team. It use to be that reputable newspapers would expose wrongdoing even if it meant targeting a valued local, regional, or national advertiser. Now a days, a Pilot advertiser may no longer runs the risk of being singled out for wrong doing. Perhaps there is no way to pick up the slack in this important industry, but looking out for taxpayers and serving as the true watchdog for a ?tax burdened" community might peak the interest of many locals who may not be intrigued with a news source that fails to look out for the very people they serve.
Kinda' saw that one coming...
I was wondering when this recession was finally going to catch up with the Pilot and it looks as though this day has arrived. A few things I have noticed: Readers are not simply the unwashed simpletons many newspaper editorial boards seem to think we are-first and foremost, we're customers and as such, we don't appreciate how we're spoken down to by our local paper. We also don't appreciate the fact that our local newspaper can under-report or even ignore stories of local significance. It seems to me that our local newspaper has avoided stories of local importance, critical facts entirely ignored, nearly given up on investigative journalism and backed away from stories because of political correctness. I've seen it happen and sometimes, I was even at the event being written about and wondered how the reporter could have not reported accurately on the events that transpired.
I have also noticed that the editorial page seems to reflect the opinions of a few who consider themselves to be some kind of intellectual elite and are usually quick to point out or print the letters of those with more liberal leanings, but conservative viewpoints are ridiculed, ignored or disparaged. One thing I'll say is, these practices have not endeared the Pilot Editorial Board to a lot of folks who once bought your paper but now prefer to keep their money in their pocket.
If you want our money, it's a good idea not to insult us with your opinions, but instead more accurately reflect ours.
Newspapers have always had a POV
And nearly all of them have been more liberal than their audience. Its the nature of journalism. Those who choose that profession are a self-selecting sample.
That's why they have Op-Ed pages and guest editorials, to bring in other points of view.
But newspapers have value, biased or not, and we should support them. At the same time, while we should not get upset about a bias on the editorial page, we should hold them to a standard of neutrality on the news itself by writing LTE's and alternatively, blog postings, if an article does not reflect reality at an event we witnessed.
I would be surprised if they did not print your observations.
OOPS!
"On Monday, we'll do entirely without an op-ed page."
This has to be an attempt to have thinking readers say "No thanks!" Their fate has been sealed.
While I agree with you Dr. Tabor...
I must say that in recent years, the Pilot has been pretty overt with the left-leaning positions and letters and only grudgingly given an opportunity for a conservative voice.
That's not being neutral at all. I think most people would be happy with a neutral newspaper or editorial page, but I don't think ours really is-I also find the reporting on local political issues/events to be not wanting, but downright absent.