The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
When city officials arrived last month at a private dormitory that houses more than 900 Old Dominion University students, and which has been the site of several armed robberies and drug deals, they found unauthorized people entering the building, malfunctioning fire alarms and no security at the front door.
It took 20 minutes for inspectors to locate two unarmed security guards, according to the report written by Deputy City Attorney Cynthia Hall.
Derek Anderson, a partner in the Houston-based firm Residential Housing Development, which owns The District at ODU, disputes the veracity of the report.
"Much of what is in the report is factually inaccurate," he said. The fire alarm was working and security was adequate, he said, adding that he has implemented all of the suggestions made by the city and ODU to improve safety at the dorm.
The city's inspection, conducted Aug. 20, came a week after The District's owner changed management companies and as crime and student safety have become high-profile issues. As ODU has shed its status as primarily a commuter school, more students are moving into nearby neighborhoods that have relatively high crime rates. Robberies and assaults on students have increased, according to crime statistics.
In June, ODU junior Christopher Cummings was shot and killed in a house he rented. The armed robberies and break-ins - in some cases committed by students - prompted ODU to beef up its security and neighbors to hold community meetings on the issue.
City officials inspected The District because of complaints from students' parents about fire alarms routinely being pulled, criminal incidents and students holding parties in which admission was charged, Hall wrote in her report.
The District, which opened between 38th and 39th streets in the fall of 2010, is a two-building complex surrounded largely by industrial businesses on the southern end of ODU's campus. Although The District is intended only for ODU students, the university does not manage the property.
The city report indicates that the night the officials visited, the two security guards had company cellphones that were programmed in a way that "in the event of an emergency they would have difficulty contacting help." Security was also "supposed to be sitting at a security desk at the front door."
Hall wrote that she and others watched as a student who lives at the dorm allowed about 10 other people unauthorized entry through the front door.
The resident manager responsible for the dorm the night of the officials' visit was not on-site, the report indicates. When he showed up, the report says, he told Hall that "we ruined his buzz and his night out on Granby Street."
He could not reset the fire alarm, which was in "test mode" and not operating, the report says.
Hall said she planned to raise with the dorm's management "the serious public safety issues observed and the perceived nonchalance in addressing fire and security issues in a complex housing so many students and guests."
A copy of the report, written Aug. 22, was obtained by The Virginian-Pilot from two city staffers. Last month, Assistant City Attorney Tasha Scott denied a Freedom of Information request from The Virginian-Pilot asking for a copy of the report, citing two portions of the state code allowing the city to withhold documents that relate to an ongoing criminal investigation.
Anderson said he is "completely unaware of any criminal investigation. I've heard nothing about that and would be shocked if that were the case."
He said he flew to Norfolk to meet with city and ODU officials last week.
Hall did not respond to several phone calls and emails to her office this week.
Mayor Paul Fraim said the city and ODU officials are working with The District's managers.
"I understand the ownership disputes some of the findings, but I think we'll be able to work all of this out," he said.
The city attorney's office provided copies of four fire code citations issued to the manager on duty that mandated a fire watch, that an emergency call box be repaired and that a professional create a fire safety plan.
The report indicates the alarm company could not reset the alarm remotely. Security guards arrived while inspectors were talking with the alarm company.
"They indicated they are the only two guards for this complex which has 330 units, 900 students, and at any given time, thousands of guests," Hall wrote.
However, Anderson said, city inspectors misinterpreted an error code, which indicated that just one sprinkler head, and not the entire system, may have been down.
The fire watch required The District to bring in additional security personnel to maintain a watch for potential fires on each floor.
"It cost us thousands of dollars," Anderson said. "But I understand erring on the side of caution."
Ellen Neufeldt, ODU's vice president for student engagement and enrollment services, said The District's owners fired the company that managed the dormitory earlier this summer.
Campus Apartments, a national firm that specializes in running private dormitories, had been in charge of The District a week before the city inspection, Anderson said.
Neufeldt said the new management group has rectified all of the issues outlined in the city report.
City Councilman Barclay C. Winn said he was shocked when he read the report.
"For their own investment, and for the quality of life for the students, I'm surprised they weren't better prepared," he said. "I'm glad to hear they've made changes. It sounds like they needed to."
Bobby Benson, a senior from Chester, said he was concerned about the dorm's safety last school year. His concerns included false fire alarms, robberies and assaults in the complex. So far, the only issues that have occurred this year have been a handful of false fire alarms, he said.
Josh Peek, a sophomore from Springfield, called The District "one of the nicest places I've ever lived."
"I love it here," he said.
However, he and other ODU students said they were unaware of the issues found during the city's inspection
Kristi Everetts, a sophomore from Stafford, said she feels safe at The District, but only because she is cautious.
"I'm not from around here, but I'm not dumb enough to walk around this neighborhood at 3 a.m.," she said. "You're just asking for trouble if you do that."
Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com
____
DOCUMENT | DORM INSPECTION REPORT
Click on the yellow highlighted areas for more information.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Cheap=Inadequate
The problem that exists is that costs associated with having proper, adequate security are often seen as "prohibitive". In many cases, a business will hire a security company that offers the lowest bid because it saves them money. Unarmed security is usually the cheapest way to go. But, by regulation, an unarmed security officer can't do anything beyond call the police. Just because there have not been any major incidents this year does not mean the security is adequate, as the report by the city shows. A crime report shows 12 crimes in the past week alone within a 1 mi radius of The District. How long will it be before the issues come back? I would say as soon as the criminals realize the security is unarmed.
Maintance Problems = Security Headaches
Having several friends that live at The District currently, I have somewhat of an inside view on this matter. From what I have seen and what my friends have told me, the security personnel at The District seem consistently overtaxed. According to this report there are as few as 2 guards on shift?...in a building that is 4 stories and occupies an entire block. The main problem I have noticed is the seeming utter lack of maintenance and/or repair to the building. With the fire panel regularly having a "Trouble Alarm" light lit, exterior doors that can simply be pulled open without a key, burnt out lights, exit signs and thermostats broken or missing...many of which have been that way for a month or longer. Where's the real problem here?
Why were the other inspections "blanked out"
Is this another "hit job" like Have a Nice Day and Bar were? The media needs to put this in perspective and FOI inspection reports from all the other large apt. complexes in the city and compare what their violations were, if they have been inspected at all. If an apt. building does not have a fire suppression or alarm system, or does not have a complaint filed on it, you will find the city probably hasn't inspected it. I am unaware of any code that requires an apt. complex to have security on site, or requires fire exit doors to be secure to stop entry from the outside. THEY MUST open from the inside and the hardware must operate but there is no code that requires them to lock people out. Andy Fox's report was much adieu about nothing.
safety? what safety?
My daughter...who has a brown belt and a CCW eventually transferred out of ODU because of the several...several close calls she had as a young female student there...yes she could have shot someone, or broken a nose, or a leg...but she said she wanted to attend school...not attend combat training. She is a self aware, very self assured intelligent young woman, but rather small in stature and usually had at least a disturbing incident once every couple of weeks..The campus may be deemed safe...but the areas around the campus are definitely not...except for the daytime hours....
Danger?
I've been going to ODU for 4 years now, and I can safely say that the only time students are at risk, at least more risk than is to be expected anywhere, is when they choose to put themselves at risk. The majority of these incidents occur after midnight, off campus. Even then, ODU provides escort services and shuttle buses to get around campus when it's late.
Good job, Harry
The only fact I question is about the 900 folks who live there being ODU students. I have been told that the property is open to any student, I have been told some are fron NSU, I would guess some from other schools in the area. Don't see that as a problem, but would like to know the truth.
I don't understand the Bar Task Force being involved. I question the veracity of someone who writes that 900 residents would have "and at any given time thousands of guests". It doesn't ring true
Are there rules and regs surrounding the number of security guards? If so, how many guards should there have been? The folks not being at the desk, no big deal. Lots of times guards have to be away from desk to make rounds. Can't protect sitting at a desk.
Finally,
a big issue in my mind. Why does the city take property by emininent domain, turn it over to the University, for them to sell to private developers for student housing. Just like they are continuing to do with Central Radio and Norva Plastics. Based on the location, is the same developer going to build more student housing.
Has anyone read Orwell's works?
Dumb enough.....
"I'm not dumb enough to walk around this neighborhood at 3 a.m.".....there you go, reality! Reality, its not allowed to carry concealed, there was an article not 2 weeks or less ago about this very issue..security on campus, must have been related to CCW? Not! Reality, the place has always been crime central. It is what it is, I doubt anyone is so naive to think that they are safe at night in Norfolk, so why all the hub bub? College campus is no barrier for crime, no more than it is anywhere these day. Let the people protect themselves and hire a security group capable of enforcement and protection, not just radios on their hips. What good is security on this level?
Not True
"...city inspectors misinterpreted an error code, which indicated that just one sprinkler head, and not the entire system, may have been down."
There is no way to valve off one sprinkler head. Systems are not allowed to have valves except for the main valve which must be chained open and/or monitored remotely. Article states that the alarm system was "in test" which precludes alarms from sounding and the alarm from dialing out. If a system is placed "in test" an impairment should be phoned in to the NFD & the insurance company. Fire watches must be posted if the system is impaired. There is a difference between the fire sprinkler system and the alarm system. Both must be maintained and tested both by law and insurance regulations.
Bothering the students, ignoring the crime
The police working the ODU neighborghoods are legendary for spending all their time with nonsense alcohol "crimes" and ignoring the real crimes a few blocks away. They see an adult sitting quietly on his stoop sipping a beer, and here come three squad cars to arrest him, his roommates, and everyone who happens to walk by and ask what's going on.
Why? It's safer. The cop can spend three hours of his shift "thoroughly" dealing with the "crime" and all its paperwork. Then on to the next one. Beats going into a drug deal, gang turf, heavily armed hoodlums, etc. a few blocks away. Can't blame 'em.
Now the real crimes are crossing into the student housing areas. I guess the cops will move on to busting up the Larchmont yard parties. Even safer.