©
By Tom Breen
Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson told his "700 Club" viewers that divorcing a spouse with Alzheimer's disease is justifiable because the disease is "a kind of death."
During the portion of the show where the one-time Republican presidential candidate takes questions from viewers, Robertson was asked what advice a man should give to a friend who began seeing another woman after his wife started suffering from the incurable neurological disorder. The question was posed with 10 minutes left in the broadcast.
"I know it sounds cruel, but if he's going to do something, he should divorce her and start all over again, but make sure she has custodial care and somebody looking after her," Robertson said.
The chairman of the Christian Broadcasting Network, which airs the "700 Club," said he wouldn't "put a guilt trip" on anyone who divorces a spouse who suffers from the illness, but added, "Get some ethicist besides me to give you the answer."
Most Christian denominations at least discourage divorce, citing Jesus' words in the Gospel of Mark that equate divorce and remarriage with adultery.
Terry Meeuwsen, Robertson's co-host, asked him about couples' marriage vows to take care of each other "for better or for worse" and "in sickness and in health."
"If you respect that vow, you say 'til death do us part,'" Robertson said during the Tuesday broadcast. "This is a kind of death."
A network spokesman said Wednesday that Robertson had no further statement.
Divorce is uncommon among couples where one partner is suffering from Alzheimer's, said Beth Kallmyer, director of constituent services for the Alzheimer's Association, which provides resources to sufferers and their families.
"We don't hear a lot of people saying 'I'm going to get divorced,'" she told The Associated Press. "Families typically respond the way they do to any other fatal disease."
The stress can be significant in marriages though, Kallmyer said, because it results in the gradual loss of a person's mental faculties.
"The caregiving can be really stressful on a couple of levels," she said. "There's the physical level. There's also the emotional level of feeling like you're losing that person you love."
As a result, she said, it's important for couples to make decisions about care together in the early stages of the illness, when its effects aren't as prominent.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
A very real perspective for the surviving, struggling spouse...
http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/16/was-pat-robertson-right/
HMMMM
Tinky Winky disagrees!
It is my belief-------------
Pat Robertson has lost his mind! What next --- it's ok to divorce your wife because she has cancer, or a headache? Hey Pat --- did you forget "in sickness and in health -----"? Sounds like to me you did. There isn't ANY way you can justify what you said, and NO it's not taken out of context.
Virginia Crusader is wrong
I guess you do not know about the blood diamonds and Mr. Robertson, do you? You don’t like judgments when the good book is full of them? There is plenty of material that is Written, that is, the Word of God that defines this tare and false prophet named Pat Robertson.
He contradicts the Word of God. Should those who read and know the Word of God be PC and not speak up? God forbid they hold back, we are to stand and to speak the Word of God.
Robertson makes judgments all the time that are not backed by the Word of God concerning His goodness. Did you know the Master called the spiritual leaders of his day born of their father the devil? That is bad seed, another lordship and the unforgiveable sin; it is enmity to God. Robertson was ‘born agai
My
goodness.... so much judgmentalism and hate directed against Pat. I do not agree with what he said, but it's just an opinion. Folk are calling him evil and the like. He is not evil. He is just wrong on this matter. Calm down.
wrong on THAT matter?
he's been wrong on a lot of things lately, praying away hurricaines, etc...the list would be nearly endless...he's had his time in the shade...he should just let his handlers give out the opinions and press releases and vette them before they hit the press....
No hate on my part.
These are just our opinions too. And, in my opinion I would rather spend eternity in the pits of hell then have to listen to the "Pat's" of the world conveniently decide what to use and not use out of the bible. Yes, I am willing to take that chance on my soul.
No evidence whatsoever there
No evidence whatsoever there is such a thing as a soul, or a physical place called hell. Not one iota, not one observation, not a thing.
There is certainly evidence that the source for those teachings--the Bible--is a deeply flawed book filled with mistake after mistake written by ignorant and bigoted savages who justified slavery, rape, genocide, murder, among other abhorrent acts.
Pat Robertson is certainly a poor 21st century example of a decent, moral human being, but compared to the repulsive people of God in the Bible, he is a saint.
Like everyone else -------
You are entitled to your beliefs and opinions no matter what they are. You better hope your right, because you won't get a second chance to get it right!
True
We both have a 50/50 chance of being right and wrong. Like I said I will take my chances.