The Virginian-Pilot
©
In the spring of 2009, Jeff Musselman found himself in Washington, D.C., at one of the earliest tea party rallies. He and thousands of others were protesting the nation's busted political system.
This morning, you can probably find the rangy Old Dominion University student in Commercial Park, occupying Norfolk and doing the same.
The Chesapeake native is the kind of guy who would freak out Washington, if Washington bothered to pay attention to him.
His message is simple and descriptive: American democracy is broken. Money broke it.
The only people who argue with that premise are the corporations, unions and the wealthiest individual contributors. Oh, and the politicians who get rich and powerful in the process.
Whether a tea partier or occupy whatever-er, the folks who have taken to the street in the past few years have done so because American politics in 2011 doesn't routinely care one whit what most of us think. Instead of listening to the message from the streets, Washington finds some excuse to marginalize anyone who points that out.
And so the tea party becomes an angry tricorn caricature right up until the moment it is absorbed into the Republican Party. The occupy movement becomes a festival of incoherent and unemployed hippies trashing America's cities.
Neither, of course, is anywhere close to the truth. But the opprobrium is predictable from a political class desperate to maintain the status quo. After all, imagine the damage those folks could do to a sweet scam.
At that scam's heart, a few donors are able to buy politicians, parties, PACs, pundits. The resulting political horror show is defined by bribes masquerading as contributions resulting in an institutional system of double-dealing that makes the most corrupt banana republic look like a paragon of rectitude.
This corruption is where you'll find the birth pangs of crony capitalism, of an overcomplicated tax code that gives its advantages to those who least need it, of a regulatory structure that is an array of impossible standards, of a monumental federal bureaucracy built to support it all.
Through the years, I've thought that public financing was the solution to fundamentally immoral politics. Auctions. Pooled contributions. Completely opening the system. Completely closing it.
In the end, I still have no idea.
At this point, all I can tell you is that there's a problem, that it was exacerbated by an overly ideological Supreme Court, and that if it isn't soon arrested, American democracy will be well and truly sold to the highest bidder.
All of which apparently makes me a member of both Occupy Norfolk and the tea party, though I haven't spent an evening in the park and I think listening to Glenn Beck is punishment.
A quartet of occupiers - occupants - came in to talk with the Editorial Board this week, and they were as unclear about how to fix the problem as I have been for the past several paragraphs.
"We feel like we're drowning," said Dariel Clark, a student at Old Dominion. "We get our head above water for like 30 seconds, and then we get dragged back down."
And if that is an apt description of the current economy, the lack of help is no surprise.
"There's so much lobbying that politicians end up representing corporations rather than people who elected them," said Anita Cafiero, who runs Path Norfolk, a vegan restaurant.
It's no wonder people are angry in America, that it has become our existential stance in a punishing economy. Even if we're not waking up in Commercial Park, we still wake up frustrated with the system, frustrated with the lack of change, frustrated with the pats on the head from the political class, frustrated as real grievances become talking points.
And through it all, the symbiosis between elected officials and their sponsors grows worse with every day. As my 15-year-old put it: The only people who can fix the problem are the ones benefiting from it. So why would they?
The answer, of course, is they won't. Instead, they'll wait out the anger. Wait for the tea party to be softened and absorbed by the system, wait for the occupants to get cold. Wait for everyone to go back to families, jobs, lives.
A few minutes before the meeting was due to end, Musselman stood up from the table. He had to go to work.
Donald Luzzatto is The Pilot's editorial page editor. Email: donald.luzzatto@pilotonline.com.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Amen -- but what about Big Money and Fort Monroe?
(SaveFortMonroe@gmail.com) I agree with Mr. Luzzatto, but I don’t understand something here. On the one hand, if I read him right, he reveals a sharp awareness of the ill effects of Big Money in politics. On the other, he and his editorial-board colleagues cling to a faith that once a national park is established at Fort Monroe with a huge gap on the sense-of-place-conferring bayfront shoreline -- a gap that’s envisioned solely because Fort Monroe is Big Money real estate -- the development interests will do what they have grimly refused for six years to do: relent on their own small, short-term, narrow private profit for the sake of larger, longer-term public cultural and financial enrichment. I believe that VPAP affirms that real estate developers are the biggest bankrollers of Virginia politics. And so I hope the Pilot editorial board will explain its faith about the footprint of the future national park at Fort Monroe. In my view, the editors have led well on almost everything about Fort Monroe except this one crucial question. It's not too late to stop the financially and culturally counterproductive overdevelopers -- the very people whom Mr. Luzzatto's op-ed condemns. Thanks.
Everybody Wants A Piece Of The Pie
Their is an old saying that goes somehing like this "When the Pain and Fear of remaining where you are, becomes more than the Pain and Fear of moving on to something new a person will begin the process of moving on to something new"...this proxy is about CHANGE, and it applies to many things and can also apply Groups of people as well. As described in the Article those that have a "Bigger" piece of the pie, will resist changing things that will anyway amount to their piece of the pie becoming smaller....I don't think this a new concept. Within this unstable economy those that have MONEY, GOOD JOB BENIFITS, POWER AND OTHER PERKS related to supporting their lifestyles and the Money that their families have to use, will Resist any change that causes their piece of the pie to become smaller..On the other side, those that feel their piece of the pie is less than it should be, or needs to be, will attempt to change things to allow their piece of the pie to become bigger....BOTH CAMPS ARE MOTIVATED BY THE FEAR AND PAIN THAT IS RELATED TO CHANGE...Their are other things to consider, related to Higher Ideals and Social Moral Duty to lend a hand to effect change if they feel something is wrong, but the bottom line, is the bottom line, meaning it is somewhat rare for People/Politicians to effect change just because of some Ideal related to Moral Duty...So in this the Regular Americian and the Politician are exactly the same and effected by the same Motivations, at least in my opinion.
Speak for yourself
I am not motivated by fear, but by my anger over our governement breaking face with the people. I won't stand by quietly while some seek to balance the budget on the back of the 99%.
I am truly disgusted by the idea of breaking faith with our military vets after they have risked all for our democracy. I am motivated by my love for this country & humanity.
Carl Jung said there is no movement without emotion. This is the expression of our joint frustration & it is growing into a true movement of the people.
Emotions
If you are a Study or fan of Carl Jung...some of this Theories relate to your comments, But all humans follow Emotional pathways, related to how the process Emotions...It follows this process, almost without exception....First a person experiences, some situation that causes FEAR....their FEAR grows into RESENTMENTS, RESENTMENTS turn into ANGER, ANGER becomes HATE their HATE becomes RAGE..turns into fights, Jail or worse, Just so you know....Humans also have the ability to not feed into this emotional vortex and break the Emotional chain reaction....That is if understand something about their emotional process and desire to stop feeding into it...I have always found that Anger produces bitter fruit, not to say I don't get angry on occasion, as most other people do also... .Thanks for the comment..Best Wishes
You made some good points
and I would ask you to consider this. I am not visiting Occupy Norfolk to vent my anger nor to antagonize those who might hold a different viewpoint, but rather to open a civil dialogue. Believed me, I have received anger. trucks rolling by calling us names. it hurts we are so far apart in our beliefs. By my presence I am admitting publicly that I have held anger towards the elite who have systematically corrupted our democracy, not my fellow citizens.
I acknowledge my duty to reach out to my fellow Americans & stand up for what I believe. Last weekend an elderly conservative man entered into a dialogue with me & things got a little heated. We stayed civil & worked through it. After 20 minutes or so we came to the conclusion that we agreed the granting of corporate personhood was not logical. How can a human grant civil right to a legal entity? He added the fact that corps are not mentioned in the Bill of Rights or the Constitution. We laughed & shook hands. It was an amazing moment. Who among us has not felt fear or anger? We have all come up short. I think we have a collective wisdom we can tap into to solve some of our challenges. I don't believe our country would better off without the conservative voice as well. We need to evolve together. Replace our anger with understanding. It will take everyone listening to each other. Read the First Collective statement from Occupy Wall St before you dismiss us or label us. This is the type of thinking that got us here.
The real problem is the money
Sadly, your 15 year old has nailed the problem. "The only people who can fix the problem are the ones benefiting from it. So why would they?" The public has lost the ability to counter the bribes large corporations make to politicians. The public now have no choice but to sit back and take what whatever those with big bucks dictate, and the politicians dance to their tune. Money is the root of this evil, and now that the Supreme Court decided that corporations are people, it will get worse.
You are a part of the 99%
& you do have a choice if you have the courage to embrace it. I agree with yuou that greed is th eroot of all evil. Read the First Collective statement from Occupy Wall St. If you agree, go to an Occupy site near you & engage with others.
Predictable condescension
It's sad to see such a condescending article expressing such cynical hopelessness but it isn't surprising given the stark difference between Tea Party boosterism and lack of occupation coverage by the corporate press including the Pilot. Those protesting the theft of our Republic from coast to coast are not "a festival of incoherent and unemployed hippies trashing America's cities." They are a cross cut of America; old, young, middle-class and poor from many backgrounds, and have over 50% public support. At the heart of the message is the taking back of our representative Republic from the corruption of big money influence through electoral reform and re-regulation of finance. Issues ranging from public accountability to job creation, debt relief, and ecological sustainability all derive from basic message. We can not afford cynicism and hopelessness. The 99% aren't going away.
Spot on Al
I hope the irony that Mr. Luzzato has never visited Occupy Norfolk or any occupy encampment in person is not lost here. He formed his opinion on a world wide movement by speaking with four people who deserve all respect for establishing an occupy encampment in our city, but their thoughts are just that, their own, this movement is bigger than any idividual person. We are a leaderless group. The movement is not about personalities or egos.
One of my personal reasons for being onsite is to discuss, face to face with others, the history & impact of Citizen's United SCOTUS decision and what that means for our future. I like the fact that Occupy is a movement & strives to be non partisan but the fact of the matter is voting can change things. Getting money out of politics can change things. Our next leader will appoint SC justices, a fact too big to ignore.
I love humanity, & I have faith we can figure this out together people. I believe that but we need to do it face to face, respectfully & lovingly. We are the ones we have been waiting for, don't miss the meta argument of the movement. You can't occupy behind a screen. Occupy your own mind & the site. This might be our last good chance for a peaceful movement to stop the kleptocracy from consolidating power. Don't stay away & think you can get the truth about something this monumental from an article. Mr. Luzzato is one voice and so is yours. Educate yourself & let your voice be heard.
"In with the new boss. Same as the old boss.
The WHO nailed it about 40 years ago. Prior to our major elections everyone gets all jacked up about voting the bums out. Of course one persons bum is another persons saviour. And then after the election,....(drum roll please)....the newly elected turn out to be at least as bad as the bums they replaced. Just take a look at the "Hope and Change" crew and the way they are just as corrupt and incompetent as the last.