68°
forecast

Norfolk missed chance to toast city's historic graveyards

Posted to: Kerry Dougherty Opinion

An attitude adjustment. That's what Norfolk's stodgy leaders need. Beginning with their attitudes about alcohol and ending with their attitudes about death.

Last time I checked, Prohibition was repealed in 1933. Yet antiquated state laws and odd notions about liquor linger, telegraphing the curious message that while alcohol may be lawful, it's still a sin.

Sorry, not in my church. Probably not in yours, either.

Yet temperance-tainted prohibitions against drinking in public (drinking in private is preferable?) remain on the books - in Norfolk and elsewhere - giving politicians the power to tell the rest of us where we can legally enjoy a beer or a glass of wine.

Case in point: Last week, city officials refused to allow a Halloween party to raise money for Hope House and Friends of Norfolk's Historic Cemeteries in a vacant part of a graveyard. The reason? Booze isn't allowed in city parks - except for Town Point and Ocean View.

That needs to change.

While we're talking attitude adjustments, it would be refreshing if Norfolk - and everywhere else - adopted some enlightened ideas about death, too. It wasn't that long ago that the deceased were laid out at home, where the family and neighbors kept vigil until the burial. Not a particularly sanitary practice, but one that demystified death.

Today, the dead are rolled out the back doors of hospitals and surreptitiously sent to funeral homes, where they are primped for a quick viewing before they are laid to rest in some soulless cemetery, in grave sites topped by flat, cookie-cutter markers.

There was a time - the Victorian era, according to Norfolk's Bureau of Cemeteries website - when graveyards doubled as parks. They were designed to be bucolic places with trees, meandering pathways and benches, where families would "have a picnic, take a stroll, spend a Sunday afternoon."

Norfolk is home to several of these stunning cemeteries. What a pity more people don't enjoy their ambiance. On a sunny morning this week, I wandered - alone - for several hours through Cedar Grove and Elmwood cemeteries, which span the 200 block of Princess Anne Road.

Elmwood's picnic area, beside the cemetery office, is the would-be site of the Halloween party, which organizers had promised would be "respectful and restrained." The presence of sawbuck tables suggest that the proposed soiree would not be the first time folks gathered there for recreation. I'm guessing it wouldn't have been the first time liquor was consumed inside those iron gates, either.

The city's cemeteries boast both majestic monuments and modest markers and are populated by surnames familiar to anyone who has lived in Hampton Roads for a while: Willcox, Malbon, Roper, Whitehurst, Selden, Sessoms, Stant, Venable, Grandy and Dabney, among them.

Like all old cemeteries, these are also the final resting places for a shocking number of children. It's impossible to read the neat, chiseled lettering on the headstone of the unnamed "Infant son of Beulah and Smith Wilson, Born and Died on May 21, 1909" without thinking of the tears that must have soaked the ground as this baby was laid to rest 102 years ago.

Over in Cedar Grove, I paused by the odd, bolster-shaped headstone of "Mrs. Mary Winnifred Wise" who died in 1873 at the age of 23. Nestled beside her well-preserved headstone is a tiny white granite marker with writing that has weathered away. Her infant, perhaps?

Yet, when it came to luring the public inside these city treasures, it was Councilman Paul Riddick's point of view that prevailed.

"It would not be respectful to the people buried in these cemeteries" to stage a gala so near the graves, he declared.

Once again, Riddick is wrong.

In fact, the best way to disrespect the dead is to leave their grave sites unvisited.

Kerry Dougherty, (757) 446-2306, kerry.dougherty@cox.net

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Defining disrespect is kind

Defining disrespect is kind of like defining obscenity...you know it when you see it. Partying in the grave yard just seems to be too short a leap across the line into what most of us would consider disrespectful. I personally find cemeteries very peaceful places however they do nothing for the dearly departed; it's really only the living that receives benefit. I can understand those that remain taking offense to the thought of someone in a drunken stupor potentially barfing on their loved one’s grave or falling on an already fragile headstone and furthering the problem of disrepair...not to mention suing the city for their injuries. There are plenty of other places to party...

I support the city on this

I support the city on this one. People should be going to Cemeteries to pay resepect to the dead. I can't support this kind of trendsetting though certainly the idea is intriguing. Would most definating increase vandelism don't you think. Kerry have you ever lost anyone??

have some respect

There are plenty of places to get drunk in Norfolk without doing it where families buried their dead relatives. Have some respect. Sure, youth probably do go there with alcohol late night on weekends and not get caught but that does not mean the city should condone and approve it to be done with a permit. Very poor taste. Good job city counsel.

Hey! Dias de los Muertos

Actually, there's a precedent for this. There must be a religious component (Pre- the hard drinking) and a picnic with the family at the grave. Then the gifts of flowers/food for the dead. I understand Dias de los Muertos much more than I understand a crowd of people (not related to those interred) paying to tramp around a cemetery, where grieving families have gathered and invested treasure to observe religious rituals, while drinking in the dark (and for someone's profit!!). Too strange. Very recently two people were sent to jail for stealing vases from a cemetery causing a great deal of angst for the families of those buried there. There are expectations of solemnity and decorum about death/burials; just ask any Pharoah.

The full quotation BadKitty is...

For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten, Ecclesiastes 9:5. Which implys to me, the dead would not know or care if you sat by their graves or danced on them. But that the memory of them is forgotten is telling and works both ways. It seems we have forgotten to respect our forebearers graves. And that is what Paul Riddick is afraid folks will see. Once passed from the body, the spirit is no longer there. Just a vault, a casket and decaying. I totally agree with Ms. Kerry. Norfolk, and especially Caretaker Riddick are uptight and superstitious and are afraid of things that go bump in the night.

Thanks for the comment.

I think their is a simular Statement regarding the dead in the New Testament, that relates more directlt toward the meaning I tried to put forth...But I may be wrong, I'm not an expert on the Bible It's a Big Complex Book.....Considering the Theological Debate regarding a Christian being able to "Communicate" with the Dead in any way the general vibe regarding getting into doing these types of things, comes out as being rather Unwise..and it is suggested, by Scripture in a number of places that the "Results" of "Hiring" a person to do this for you is in fact a "Sin"....but I'm not going to get into Sin because I'm not some type of Overlord that would point fingers at people...Some people have a Job doing this...Above My Pay Grade..Thanks.

The Dead Know Not Anything

Above is an Quote out of the Christian Bible. In response to Mystics and"Others"with an ability to Communicate with the Dead, leading to"Speculation"that anyone in contact with the dead or"Spirits"is not in contact with dead Human Spirits but is in contact with Demons or other agents of Evil. I'm posting this regarding some of my fellow Christians ability to Visit the Graves of their Dearly Departed and Communicate with them in some way, so a"Party within a graveyard has nothing to do with harming your"Relationship"with the Dead. The fact is once a person is Dead any contact with them is Impossible. The core argument against a"Party"within a Graveyard is it Harms their relationship, I say the Dead have no relationship with the living.

Try again....how about taking a class on etiquette

Try this, look it up in the dictionary. Miriam Websters would be a good place to start. It is a burial ground. It has nothing about party events or fund raising events. Try again, most people realize that a burial ground is not the proper place for alcohol consumption or hosting a party, but about paying respect to those that have passed. How about taking a class in etiquette and it may shed a little more insight before you make judgment call on doing the right thing.

No.

You're usually right on the money Kerry, but this time I disagree with you. Party somewhere else.

Respect for the dead

I wonder how many people that agree with the Council decision have actually visited the two graveyards in question. I have. Even with the City's Bureau of Cemeteries caring for them with limited resources, there are broken headstones and the beautiful cemeteries are in disrepair. I don't see council funneling funds for cemetery repair. How much longer will these parks last without some funding? Some people came up with a way to help repair damage and Council nixed it. I thought Prohibition was lifted in the 30's. (I'm not a drinker.) I bet if we could poll the residents of these cemeteries, most would appreciate a little party to benefit their permanent domicile. Respect for the dead includes upkeep of their resting place.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Kerry Dougherty rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox