68°
forecast

Spills into Nottoway River net $1 million in penalties

Posted to: Environment News Western Tidewater

Three companies that run a chemical plant in Franklin have agreed to pay more than $1 million in penalties for a series of toxic spills into the Nottoway River, which supplies drinking water for Norfolk and Virginia Beach.

The federal government sued the three companies and has already received $365,000 from Eastman Chemical Resins, according to settlement papers. The other two, Hercules and GEO Specialty Chemicals, have agreed to pay $700,000, officials said.

Officials said there should be no concern over the quality of tap water. The discharges, which took place between 2005 and 2007, occurred downstream from the water intake pipe.

The Department of Justice filed a 40-page civil action on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency against Hercules and GEO on Sept. 29, and a settlement agreement is expected to be filed any day. A spokesman for Hercules confirmed the matter had been settled.

In an email, EPA spokeswoman Donna Heron said: "The EPA has been in extensive settlement discussions with these companies. And by filing both the complaint and settlement at the same time, it saves the government and ultimately the taxpayer the expense of litigation."

In an unrelated action, Hercules paid a $14,000 state fine in August for an unauthorized discharge, in September 2010, of ammonia-contaminated water into a canal that leads to the Nottoway. GEO paid the state a $12,800 fine in 2008 for a 1,800-gallon chemical spill into the river. Both spills, like some of the others listed by the EPA, caused fish kills in the Nottoway.

The chemical plant, which has been around since 1955, is on about 120 acres three miles west of Franklin where Va. 650 and 671 meet. The Nottoway River is a quarter-mile away and linked by a canal.

Hercules operated the entire facility until 2001, when it sold off two units on-site to Eastman and GEO. The plant produces rosin, fatty acids and organic peroxides. The primary raw material is tall oil, a byproduct of the wood pulping industry.

The federal lawsuit lists five spills that occurred between 2005 and 2007.

In 2005, at least 100 pounds of crude tall oil and fatty acids were discharged into the canal and later found downstream in the river. Later that year, 20 gallons of a combustible chemical were discharged through the canal and into the river, A similar spill occurred in 2006 and two more in 2007, according to the lawsuit.

Other allegations in the suit:

-- A dam-and-containment system at the canal failed to prevent discharges into the river.

-- Hercules failed to implement an emergency response training program and failed to conduct annual training drills as required by federal law.

-- An inventory of storage tanks failed to identify four above-ground tanks containing chemical mixtures, two 300-gallon fatty acid reclamation vats and several 55-gallon drums of oil.

-- Hercules failed to report storage of sulfuric acid, a hazardous chemical.

Officials involved said the case has taken years to reach the point of settlement.

Jim Vitak, a spokesman for Columbus, Ohio-based Ashland, the parent company of Hercules, maintains that the company did nothing wrong. Hercules merely owns the land underneath the equipment operated by Eastman and GEO, he said.

"The important points are while we're pleased to have this matter brought to a resolution, from our standpoint we denied that we violated any regulations or that we were responsible for those of GEO or Eastman," he said.

Eastman's corporate communications office in Kingsport, Tenn., issued a statement saying that the spills were minor and did not result in significant environmental damage. According to the statement:

"Eastman made substantial capital improvements to spill preparedness at the site even before receiving EPA's inspection report. The company also has made improvements to its waste water treatment system and procedures to characterize wastes.

"Eastman takes great care in our day-to-day operations to protect the river. We have a strong environmental management system in place and continually work at improving it."

GEO did not respond to messages seeking comment.

Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343, tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

$1,000,000 fine for 100 gallons of waste

Wow! This fine really begs the question,"Is our government over-reaching?" I just hope that the 100 pounds and 20 gallons are mis-prints...hopefully more like 100,000 pounds and 20,000 gallons for a $1,000,000 fine. If the printed facts are correct, then we all should go for a swim in the Nottoway as farm and residential runoff are a much bigger problem for that river. It is possible that Eastman and GEO have as systemic problem and deserve a fine. It is also possible that they should have been more diligent. Hopefully they have made some changes, but anyone paying close attention to the facts should really question the size of the fine. No wonder so many of us question whether we can trust our government.

hmmm Really?

It’s a shame that the story is not factual and thus gives these companies a bad reputation in the eye of the public. Keep in mind that your neighbors and friends are employed by these companies (and they drink the water too) that some of you would rather levy such big fines that they close (like International Paper). The government is not perfect either (sewage in the Elizabeth River). If the commenter’s are so worried about polluters, in addition to closing all the chemical plants, we should move the all naval bases back to Jacksonville. I mean with all the oil runoff from all the cars, boats (excuse me ships), etc and the jet noise. Hampton Roads would then look a lot more like Detroit.

No good excuse for this

I've been an industry environmenal engineer and manager for several decades, and prevention of these releases and implementation of the applicable environmental programs is really not that difficult. It's sad that this far into the 21st century, and over 40 years since the EPA was created, that we still have large industries either this clueless on proper environmental management, or willing to operate this far out of compliance. It's not rocket science; it just takes commitment, the right philosophy, and sound management.

And you wonder why people

And you wonder why people are opposed to uranium mining. Never mind how much of a fine we would net if our drinking waters were polluted with uranium tailings, it wouldn't even come close to covering the cost of the health problems it could cause.

From another viewpoint

So let me get this straight.. they had an accident, made the necessary repairs to fix the problem and now, they're paying a "fine" - check.

Here's another way to look at the fine. Do you not think those company's will raise their prices to cover it? Now, the customers of those products are paying more becuase of this fine. What if the EPA assessed a fine but waived it if the company's put it into creating new jobs?

As bad as the spill was and it was a bad one, giving the fine money over to bureaucrats to spend is equally as bad.

Where does this money now

Where does this money now go? I saw no mention of any of those funds being used to clean up or improve water quality in the river. And if these companies have such fantastic environmental controls in place and are so concerned about the river, why not take this opportunity to educate the public about what they're doing to protect the environment instead of dropping a vague PR spin? Because they're full of it! These companies got off easy. This is not the last time we'll be hearing this story. The penalties aren't severe enough to be a major deterrent.

Question

VA congressmane Morgan Griffith wants to relax the rules...what a joke!

no fines should be levied.....

as long as they create jobs. The 1.5 million is available however becaused they used the last five years to increase prices and lay-off workers to compensate for the lost; so the company is not hurting at all; they probably even made a profit off spill by cutting jobs and raising prices in order to support the upcoming fines. We (businesses) will not loose! The consumers and employees payed for this fine, not us.

here's an idea

Make those that pollute the water drink the water they soil, and bathe in it unfiltered.

Then put 'em out of business. Yep. Shut 'em down, permanently.

That will be deter polluters more than a fine will.

Willful and wanton is the legal term for this type destruction.

I support !

I support maximum fines for discharges from Fatty Acids......

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox