68°
forecast

Truck records were trashed, SPSA says

Posted to: Local Government News Norfolk

NORFOLK

Maintenance records that might have shed light on who disabled a safety device in a truck in which a sanitation worker was killed have been destroyed, an official from the region's waste management authority said Wednesday.

City officials said last week they discovered two city trucks had been rewired to disengage a safety mechanism designed to shut down the hydraulic system when the door to a truck's hopper opens.

Jerry Holton, 51 and a Navy veteran, died in February after he tried to remove debris that had clogged his truck's compaction system. The system engaged and killed him. Holton had worked in the city's sanitation department for 21 years.

The two trucks were among nine the city purchased from the Southeastern Public Service Authority in June 2010. SPSA Executive Director Rowland "Bucky" Taylor wrote Wednesday in an email that maintenance records for the trucks were thrown away after the city purchased them.

Norfolk officials have contended that they asked for maintenance records but never received them. Taylor disputed that, saying the buyers were invited to examine the records before the trucks were purchased and he believes they visited SPSA's Chesapeake headquarters to do just that.

"Staff believes someone came, but do not have record that they did or did not," Taylor wrote.

Since then, he wrote, "no request has been made for them that anyone can remember. Once the trucks were sold, the old work orders were no longer needed by SPSA and they were disposed of."

"We had our person go back (yesterday) into the records storage area, and she was unable to find any other records pertaining to these trucks," he wrote. "She periodically goes through old files and disposes of those no longer needed."

Officials from both SPSA and the city have denied that they or anyone they hired rewired the trucks to bypass their safety systems.

An investigation by the state into Holton's Feb. 3 death concluded this week. Jennifer Wester, spokeswoman for the Virginia Department of Labor and Industry, would not comment on their findings, including whether investigators discovered who rewired the trucks.

Jane Daffron, a legal assistant with the state agency, said even if the investigation is over, it is likely officials still are working on the case. It will be several weeks before further information is released, she said.

In July, the agency flagged Norfolk for 19 safety violations said to be potentially life-threatening. Eight were related to Holton's death.

Norfolk's safety officer, Craig Watkins, said the state accepted the city's responses to the citations. No fines were given and no one will face criminal charges as a result of the investigation, Watkins said.

Norfolk has changed some of its policies. Drivers are not allowed to get into the back of their trucks for any reason, even to attempt to fix minor problems, unless a trained maintenance person is there.

At the time of Holton's death, drivers were supposed to turn off their trucks, take the keys out of the ignition, and put them into their pockets before entering the back of a truck. Holton's vehicle was still running when rescue personnel responded. Had the keys been removed, the truck would not have engaged, public works director John Keifer said.

"We were told that our policy was in line" at the time of Holton's death with all federal and state policies, City Manager Marcus Jones said.

The decision to buy the trucks was made after SPSA announced that it would no longer pick up recycled materials.

Every other city in South Hampton Roads hired private companies to haul away recycled materials. Norfolk decided to take on the work itself and spent $300,000 on the SPSA trucks. The city spent more than $200,000 in maintenance on the trucks in their first year.

City Councilman Barclay C. Winn criticized the decision at the time, saying the private sector could pick up the recycled materials more efficiently. Jones recently asked for companies to bid on collecting Norfolk's recycled materials.

Watkins said the city recently asked SPSA for complete maintenance records and received only accounting records.

"They had a six-year history before we got the trucks," he said. "We have a detailed seven-month history. We want to find out what happened in those preceding six years."

City officials visited SPSA headquarters twice before the trucks were purchased, Norfolk spokeswoman Lori Crouch said. She has been unable to determine whether city staffers were provided access to maintenance records, she said.

Taylor said Norfolk was given time to review and copy maintenance records. SPSA sent the city basic information about the trucks before a Dec. 8, 2009, meeting, he said. He emailed a copy of the material to The Virginian-Pilot. SPSA officials also offered to go over hard copies of the maintenance logs, he said.

Taylor provided an email exchange that took place in early December 2009 between SPSA's Norman Strickland and Richard Cortimilia, then fleet coordinator for the city's public works department.

Cortimilia wrote: "I trust that the maintenance information is very comprehensive and difficult to send. If you were able to, please send it and if not I may request another visit to review maintenance records."

Strickland replied: "We keep hard files on that info and will require sitting down and looking through the history folders on the nine units. This isn't a problem and we can do that anytime you would like."

Since the accident, many of the managers who worked in Norfolk's waste management department in 2009 and 2010 no longer work for the city.

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

$200,000 in maintenance on the trucks in their first year.

In the first year who went thru these trucks and checked them to see if they were fit for service, when you buy a car in the summer you still check to see if the heater works,this is very sad

Leave the garbage truck. Take the cannoli.

Why does this feel like a missing episode of the Sopranos? First some "homeless guy" got ran over by a random garbage truck driving along the beach, now this guy is "accidentally crushed" by a garbage truck. Did the compacting mechanism accidentally start often? Either it did or it didn'tbut the astronomically low probability that he happened to be in the truck with the missing safety, aaaaand the switch just happened to turn on the compactor aaaand it was at the same time he was in harms way aaaand the records which show who is responsible magically disappear after 7 months is suspect. Here is what really happened: this guy had a job that someone else wanted or he owed someone money, now he "sleeps wit' da' fishez".

Buyer Beware!

If I sue an auto dealer two years after I purchase an auto over defects, I don't think any court would find in my favor. This is what you call Buyer Beware! Same result if I bought an used auto from the city through an auction. This is just simple logic!

spsa and the mafia. . .

...when it comes to record keeping, they both appear to have the same policy.

No telling....

….how many jack-legged repairs/modifications were made to these trucks in the seven months Norfolk had possession of them. Documentation of the same could have been recorded as general maintenance.

The bottom line is Norfolk had the things last.

It sounds like " operation

It sounds like " operation C.Y.A." is in full effect.

Presumably, SPSA Is A Public Agency....

If so, it is responsible, under the Virginia State code, to maintain, retain, and dispose of public documents - which these maintenance records quite possibly are (and admittedly, I'm no expert on the subject) - under strict guidelines established by the Library of Virginia.

I wonder if the reporter checked to see - or consulted with competent authority - as to whether or not the destruction of these records were in compliance with the schedule provided by the Virginia Public Records Management Manual?

http://www.lva.virginia.gov/agencies/records/

RATS!

I'm a bit off on my subject-verb agreement - that should have read "...destruction of these records WAS in compliance..."

Executive house cleaning.

"Since the accident, many of the managers who worked in Norfolk's waste management department in 2009 and 2010 no longer work for the city."

Sounds like Norfolk already cleaned house to avoid incrimination.

"many of the managers" "no longer work for the city"

How "many" is many?

And what were their positions?

And why did they leave?

Norfolk has NEVER cleaned house.

You want a glaring example of that just look at the Norfolk Police Department.

Wise up SamD.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Local Government rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


FIND US ON FACEBOOK