The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
Veteran Republican pollster Frank Luntz thinks GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain is the most affable, engaging candidate for president in 2012.
Luntz found it "amazing" that Cain came out on top Friday when his Regent University luncheon audience of more than 400 signaled with their applause whom they most wanted to be president.
Then Luntz lowered the boom.
Cain, an Atlanta-based business executive who recently joined Mitt Romney at the top of GOP presidential polls, won't be the party's nominee, Luntz declared.
"I think the electoral system is set up against him. He doesn't have the money that the other candidates have. He doesn't have the infrastructure because he's not a professional politician."
"I'm a Cain fan. I spent a fair amount of time with him," said Luntz, a GOP consultant, book author and frequent television commentator.
Cain is going to have to provide very specific details on foreign policy - a topic that, so far, he hasn't handled well, Luntz said.
By contrast, he said, Romney is an "absolutely professional" campaigner.
"He's been running since he was 12," he quipped. "But Cain's got the one advantage, which is that everybody likes him."
In the end, Luntz said, "my guess is, at this point, it's probably Romney. But I've been so surprised by what's happened." He noted the once popular, now lagging campaigns of Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Minnesota congresswoman Michelle Bachmann.
"That's what a debate does," he said.
GOP candidates are also hurting themselves, he said.
Luntz said his research shows that Romney is losing support among independent voters because of negative ads aimed at him by other presidential candidates.
"I don't understand why candidates think they can get elected president by attacking other Republicans. The enemy isn't other Republicans - the opponent is the person in the White House."
Luntz said President Barack Obama's chances of winning a second term are 50-50.
"This class warfare stuff is working," he said. "It is frightening to me that people are now resentful of those who have done well, believing that they did well on the backs of other people."
Luntz said he doesn't see much compromise between the conservative and liberal or progressive camps in the upcoming federal elections.
"They are not reconcilable," he said. "The world view on the right prioritizes freedom, and the world view on the left prioritizes equality."
Wearing a dark sports coat, white shirt and tie but also sporting bright green running shoes, Luntz acted more like a talk show host than a lecturer during his 40-minute address, roaming the large ballroom with a wireless microphone.
Mixed in with his serious political comments were humorous jabs at Democrats and Republicans.
Mentioning New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's recent dabbling in presidential politics, Luntz opined that the most dangerous place in the Garden State was anywhere between the portly governor and a buffet.
"Did you hear about the new McDonald's Obama happy meal?" he asked the crowd. "Order anything you want, and the guy behind has to pay for it."
Even his host, religious broadcaster and Regent founder Pat Robertson, who was sitting at a front table, didn't escape his barbs.
"Every time I look at him, all I can see is Al Franken in 'Saturday Night Live' playing him in 1988," Luntz said.
Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
luntz said
"I don't understand why candidates think they can get elected president by attacking other Republicans. The enemy isn't other Republicans - the opponent is the person in the White House."
Luntz seem to forget that the gop constantly attacts anyone who deosn't agree with them. They run dirty campaigns and they always will.
He's right
Romney stands the best chance because he has the capability to bring in moderates and independent voters. Cain is too conservative and won't get the independent vote. Both conservatives and liberals need to understand that by going too far to the left or the right will alienate the middle and independents. No candidate can win without the independent and moderate vote. If Cain gets the nod at the convention, he'll guarantee another term for Obama.
luntz is a really good pollster but ....
A pollster looks at the past data and weights it accordingly. To make a trend, Luntz has to look at probability which the establishment says will be Romney.
When liberals are essentially panting for Romney, it is a clear sign that the GOP establishment is wrong. The people protesting the uncontrolled spending NOW are the same ones who protested Bush's spending by STAYING HOME - and that ain't gonna happen again.
Cain's not being an experienced politicians is what the country wants (and needs).
Vote for Cain: conservative; an experienced business leader; and willing and able to say something other than what we want to hear for the sake of pacifying us.
Try this port . . .
Name a single successful experienced business leader that has been successful in Washington politics. Running a private business is extremely different from running a government office, too different in fact. This has been proven time and again, but yet some people still believe that success in business will equal success in public office.
Who were the last two most successful Republican Presidents? Try Eisenhower and Reagan, neither one of them were businessmen. That says a lot about the position.
polls and frank clutz. . .
. . .have the same thing in common, a biased spin. Wait till after the the GOP Convention and don't be so prone to drive wedges into your own party.
Not voting for Romney
I don't care what the pollsters say. Mitt Romney has Massachusetts (taxachusetts) failure written all over him. I will not vote for him. Herman Cain for President!
Just what we need: More "experienced" politicians
Just what we need, more politicians that spend their lives campaigning and self-promoting. Look at all the great things our experienced politicians are doing for us in DC! As long as Americans keep voting along partisan lines (in a post-partisan era), we'll keep getting what we've always gotten. Romney is just another politician groomed to be just that: a politician that knows how to campaign.
I think Luntz is wrong
There are 2 camps in the GOP, the establishment and the Tea Party. Romney has maybe 27% support nationwide and Huntsman has 3%, that is the extent of the establishment support. The remainder is Tea Party.
As candidates begin to fall by the wayside, Romney will peak at 30%.
Ron Paul will take 15% with him to the end, then probably support the Constitution Party candidate again. But 15% is his upper limit because most Republicans can't accept his foreign policy positions.
When Bachman and Santorum drop out, their Tea Party supporters will not go to Romney,they will divide up between Perry, Gingrich and Cain.
As soon as one of those three gives up, Romney is in third place and is effectively out.
Disagree
I guess you don't have any hope for your Libertarian candidate. I don't blame you.
I think Luntz is right. He has a better handle on politics than most quite obviously. Again, which one of the Republican candidates stands the best chance of winning the independent vote? Certainly not Perry; definitely not Cain. Of the three you stated, Gingrich stands the best chance of getting independent votes, but Romney stands an even better chance. As much as conservatives and liberals like to think they can win without the middle and the independent vote, history has proven time and again they can't.
Snake Oil at $9.99 a Bottle & Go Cain!
TPublicans are dividing the GOP. In the end they may swallow Cain’s castor oil but it’s not a panacea for financial ills. It won’t pay the debt, put more cash in fist, and allow the “job creators” to hire more people. If that were true was does the biggest job creator GE pay no U.S. corp taxes yet hire more people off-shore than here on American soil? Because that’s where the profit is! Who wants’ to pay Union thug rates right? We’d rather have dirt poor making iPods and dying on the assembly line. What happened to the original TPers going after the too-big-to-fail TARP? That agenda was hijacked by Koch Bros and transnational Corporatists waving the flag and citing the Constitution. Now the OWSs have the agenda and they are more in nu