70°
forecast

Virginia Beach: For City Council

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

Virginia Beach needs City Council members who think big, who advocate for the kinds of decisions that have made Virginia Beach so successful: establishment of the Green Line limiting development in the southern part of the city; investment in parks and open space; restoration of the Boardwalk and seawall - decisions that have prompted families to move here, businesses to invest and the Navy to stay.

Of the three candidates seeking on Election Day to fill the at-large seat vacated when Rita Sweet Bellitto moved to Seattle, Dennis Free offers a collaborative, independent voice and a command of the issues the city faces.

He rose through the ranks of the Virginia Beach Police Department and now is second in command at the Sheriff's Office. He has never run for public office but has the support of Sheriff Ken Stolle, Clerk of Court Tina Sinnen, Commonwealth's Attorney Harvey Bryant, City Treasurer John Atkinson and four state delegates.

Free is proud of the redevelopment at the Oceanfront, noting that the resort area was dying in the 1980s and that the city's improvements, including at 31st Street, spurred significant private property investment. He says the same about Town Center.

He is reluctant to support a light rail extension until he sees ridership and cost estimates but notes, correctly, that "we have to have mass transit."

He has irresponsibly hemmed himself in with a "no tax" pledge, a stand that speaks of allegiance to a vocal minority rather than a desire to respond to the needs of the time.

Free, who has taken a leave of absence to campaign, advocates a regional approach to some services, suggesting room for common ground on bigger problems as well.

His opponent, Prescott Sherrod, was appointed this summer to fill Bellitto's empty chair until the election. He offers a collaborative spirit and brings much-needed diversity to the all-white council.

Sherrod, a defense contractor and former member of the Virginia Beach Development Authority and the Minority Business Council, echoes many of the themes current council leaders have pushed: offshore wind farms; light rail, though "not at any cost"; redevelopment of eight strategic growth areas to attract more businesses and to offer pedestrian-friendly places where people can live, work, shop and eat.

Sherrod says he will work to mend a three-year rift between the council and the School Board. He supports public-private partnerships and opposes oil and gas exploration off the coast because of the risk it would pose to both tourism and the Navy - a common-sense position that puts him at odds with the council's majority.

He is seen as a vote for Mayor Will Sessoms' vision, and in fact, Sessoms pushed to get Sherrod appointed and contributed $10,000 to his campaign.

But Sherrod, despite his experience with development issues, has not shown the deep understanding of city issues that his opponents share. And he has a tax problem that detracts from his credibility as a money manager for the city.

Sherrod, who owns an engineering technology consulting firm, owed the state and federal governments nearly $400,000 and twice in the past decade has had IRS liens against him. Sherrod says he learned of the underpayments through a government audit and has worked to reduce the debt. But it's hard to make a strong case for a candidate to help decide what taxes Virginia Beach's residents will pay when he hasn't paid his own.

Even so, Sherrod would be a far better choice than the third man in the race.

In 1994, after dozens of Sandbridge homes had fallen in the ocean because of beach erosion, residents asked the city for help. They proposed establishing a tax district, increasing their own taxes to replenish the sand and save their property. At the time, Sandbridge property was assessed at $195.5 million.

Virginia Beach residents and the Army Corps of Engineers decided Sandbridge was worth protecting.

Then-City Councilman John Moss campaigned against the plan. "There's no justification to spending money to fill up the ocean with sand," he said at the time.

Sandbridge's beaches have been replenished every four years, starting in 1998. No more homes have been lost to the sea. This year, Sandbridge property was assessed at $1 billion.

Moss' hard line against such decisions was consistent across his seven years on the council between 1986 and 1995. He opposed the city's purchase of the Lake Ridge property in 1994 - a steal at $9.5 million. The 1,200 acres along Princess Anne Road are now part of Princess Anne Commons, which holds a medical complex, college campus and sports fields that fill with kids every weekend. Sentara's purchase of 71 acres alone brought the city more than it paid for the entire parcel.

Moss said the money should've been used to reduce taxes or diverted to the schools, the kind of complaint that shows just how short-sighted a councilman Moss was then and would be now.

Moss declined to be interviewed by The Virginian-Pilot Editorial Board, but his positions on Beach issues are clear.

If Moss had his way, Virginia Beach would not have helped Sandbridge. The city would not have guided development of the educational, medical and recreational complex on Princess Anne Road. It would not have spurred the mix of shops, restaurants, offices and homes at Town Center. And Virginia Beach would not be considering extending light rail past Newtown Road.

Someone with such a small vision of the future would be a relentlessly destructive force on the City Council, and for the Beach's future.

Dennis Free, on the other hand, sees what's possible. He will bring a thoughtful voice and perspective to the council, as well as an ability and willingness to forge compromise. He deserves election.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

There is a fourth candidate

Heny Ryto who refuses to tell the truth about light rail recommends Dennis Free.

Doc Tabor whose economics understanding consists of propaganda and theory but little practical application recommends John Moss.

Mike Barrett who got a favorable retroactive tax break from city council recommends Sessoms' hand-picked yes man who does not pay his own taxes reliably.

http://www.vbgov.com/government/departments/voter-registrar/Documents/Sample%20Ballots%20pdf%20files%20only/8th%2082nd.pdf

Makela is out

thanks

His name is still on the ballot.

I hope they put a notice on the ballots sent out and the machines if they still have his name.

Adjustment Time Again

About a decade ago, Vice Mayor Sessoms and Councilman Harrison were pursuing an unsustainable line. The Class of 2002, five freshman Councilmen (Wood, Maddox, Schmidt, Villaneuva, and Reeve), made a number of low-key policy shifts to put us on a much wiser course.

In his first three years in office, Mayor Sessoms has been correct a majority of the time, but Council has been dead wrong on some key issues. Time for another set of policy adjustments.

A vote for Dennis Free on November 8 is a shot across Council's bow. A win by Free would send a clear message that we want mainstream resident-friendly reforms now, benefiting all sectors of Virginia Beach (not just a few). It would force City Council into a rethink over the holidays, and hopefully provide positive change by time of the Council Retreat (probably in February). With 5 seats up in November, 2012, Council couldn't delay.

Vote Dennis Free on November 8, as it's the smart, forward-thinking thing to do.

Pilot's Editorial Board Accuracy

Based upon the forums I have attended and previous discussions held with the accessible candidates, I concede that the VP Ed Staff has accurately stated and defended its position and endorsement of Dennis Free.
Further, I believe Mr. Ryto has been erroneously stated without even commenting. Irrespective of Free's position on Light Rail, Ryto inferred his preference of Free as would have I. When the choice comes down to a rubber stamp, an obstructionist, or an open-mined analytical problem solver, a reasonably informed voter will make the same choice.

Thanks, Wally

I've made clear in a few forums my support for Dennis Free. Of course, Reid Greenmun and the VBTA hate facts.

A vote for John Moss is a vote looking backwards to the 70s.

Prescott Sherrod is a nice guy, and I've had the pleasure to serve with him in the community. However, my fear is that Council would perceive a Sherrod win as an endorsement of the status quo, and shelve needed policy shifts.

A lesson from the Vatican

When a person is being considered for Sainthood by the Catholic Church, one respected witness is chosen to vigorously oppose the candidate no matter how worthy the candidate seems to be. Even Mother Teresa's beatification had to face a 'Devil's Advocate' in the person of Christopher Hitchens.

The Virginia City Council suffers from a case of orthodoxy that would put the Vatican to shame. It desperately needs a Devil's Advocate even if you are pleased with its work in general.

There are many who could oppose the VB Council's orthodoxy on principle, but there is only one I know of who has the depth on knowledge of the City's finances to base that opposition on substance, and that is John Moss.

Moss is needed more than ever as a small voice of conscience whispering in our ears to prevent the council from running totally out of control.

Ideology rules

Frankly Tabor, what a croc. Moss vetoed the improvement of the Princess Anne/Witchduck/Kempsville intersection when he was first on Council, and the $7 M was distributed to other projects. Now, the work is being done for $35 M. His opposition cost the city, the taxpayers, and the motorists who have had to endure this terrible intersection for three more decades. Frankly, he believes he is always right about everything, and his disdain of professional input or expertise, or frankly, experience makes him unqualified for public office. For Moss, ideology rules, no matter the consequences for taxpayers. No thanks.

Prescott is the best choice

Certainly the Pilot picks up on the fact that if John Moss held power, local taxpayers would suffer greatly. He has opposed every major initiative that keeps our taxes low. His opposition to saving Sandbridge, to TIFs, to Town Center, to Lake Ridge, to the Park project at 31st Street, are just constant reminders of the effects of his opposition to projects that keep our real estate tax rates low.

Further, his Presidency of the moribund VBTA that advocates for leaving all regional service providers, firing all city and school board blue collar workers and replacing them with contractors, closing schools, recreation centers, libraries, museums, economic development, and visitor marketing, reveal a deep disdain for the interaction of the public and private sectors which depend upon each other for our prosperity. His band of zealots have lowered civility and community discourse by using derision, snickering, and laughter to oppose human service programs and those who benefit from them. His hatred of those in business associations is legion while he lectures us at every opportunity, despite the fact that he has been a bureaucrat all his life.

Prescott Sharrod will be part of the coalition on Council that will keep our finances strong, our property values high, our schools and programs viable, and our resort a cash cow. He should stay on Council.

Best choice? Please, get a clue.

Mike, Prescott Sherrod is in the Mayor's pocket-plain and simple. Elect him and you may as well give Sessoms two votes because that's the vote he will follow. Even if he attempted to stand up to the Mayor, he would either not be believed as standing on principal or, face the Mayor's wrath. Sherrod is bought and paid for by Will Sessoms to the tune of $10,000.00 and I'm sure that Will will cast a critical eye to his left every time Prescott reaches for that vote button.

Having seen Sherrod in several public forums, his responses to the questions put to him remind me of that Academic Decathlon scene for the movie Billy Madison because rarely is Prescott able to connect the dots. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9kpTvm6CYA

Then there's the tax issue. I'm sorry, but a $4000.00 mistake on one tax return, okay, I can allow for that with the complexity of the tax code. However, a $400,000.00 tax bill isn't a mistake, it's a pattern of either ignoring the books entirely or, playing fast and loose with the tax code-neither is in my estimation is an advisable position to be in when seeking public office. The Pilot got this right-why should I pay my taxes when one of those voting to spend or collect my tax dollars doesn't pay his own until he's forced to do so?

It makes me wonder why YOU would support a candidate who didn't pay his taxes because after all, those taxes have been the bread and butter for developers like you for years.

He's holding out on you, Mike.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox