79°
forecast

GOP expected to press advantage in redistricting

Posted to: Elections News State Government

Efforts to create a second Virginia congressional district with a black majority are fading after voters on Tuesday put Republicans in control of both chambers of the General Assembly.

Republicans are expected to push in January for adoption of legislation similar to a GOP-backed House bill that would adjust some boundaries for the 11 congressional districts but would leave only the 3rd District, home of U.S. Rep. Bobby Scott, with a black majority.

Some Democrats dissatisfied with the House GOP's plan are considering asking state or federal courts to intervene and draw the district lines, according to a Democratic source familiar with litigation discussions. They think the GOP approach is unfair and would violate the state constitution by failing to approve the reapportionment this year, the source said.

The law requires that boundaries for federal and state elected bodies be adjusted this year and every decade after, taking into account population changes from the U.S. census.

Mary Spain, a senior attorney for the state's Division of Legislative Services, said the constitution doesn't specify a penalty if the reapportionment is delayed. It's unclear how a court might respond to a legal challenge, she said.

Supporters of a challenge have argued that blacks make up 20 percent of the commonwealth's population and that the district lines should be drawn to increase the potential for the state's U.S. House delegation to include two African Americans rather than one.

Without the legal challenge, Democrats - particularly the state senators in the Black Legislative Caucus - would lose crucial leverage they've employed this year to push for stronger minority representation. Tuesday's election led to the Senate shifting from a Democratic majority to a 20-20 split with Republicans, and all ties will be decided by Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, a Republican.

The statehouse debate has involved two competing redistricting proposals.

The Republican-controlled House approved a plan last spring that makes some adjustments for population changes but keeps the current districts largely intact. Scott's district would be almost 60 percent black.

The Democratic-controlled Senate rejected it, proposing instead a plan that would give the 4th Congressional District, represented by Republican U.S. Rep. Randy Forbes, a 53 percent black majority. The proposal would significantly reduce Forbes' political strength by dividing Chesapeake, where he enjoys strong voter support, among three districts. It would shift the district from a GOP majority to a Democratic one, while reducing the minority population of Scott's district to 45 percent.

A six-person legislative conference committee set up to work out a compromise between the two bills has not met since it was appointed in June.

House Speaker William Howell, R-Stafford County, said Republicans tried to bring Democrats back to the bargaining table before the election, but "they didn't seem to want to do it."

State Sen. Mamie Locke, D-Hampton, who led the Senate delegation of the conference committee, said no one ever had such a conversation with her. She noted that the Republicans' chief negotiator, Henrico County Del. Bill Janis, stepped away to run for another office and has yet to be replaced.

Locke said she hopes the panel can reach a compromise that the General Assembly can consider before Dec. 31. But she said she won't accept any plan that doesn't set up a second district with a black population of at least 40 percent. After Scott's district, the closest under the GOP bill would be Forbes' district, with 32 percent.

Howell said now that the GOP will have a working majority in the Senate next year, he prefers to wait until January, when, he predicted, legislators can quickly approve new boundaries. The new lines would need to be in place in time for next year's congressional elections.

The General Assembly already has approved new district lines for its own state House and Senate districts.

Locke said that if Republicans are able to shift the redistricting decision to next year, any plan still would require the approval of the U.S. Department of Justice because of Virginia's past problems with voting rights violations. If members of the black caucus object to the plan, federal authorities will notice, she said.

State Sen. John Watkins, R-Powhatan County, acknowledged any plan adopted next year likely will be challenged.

"I suspect that certain members will probably file suit or they will have individuals file suit in federal court over a new plan," he said. "This is not going to be one of our better hours, either way."

Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

why redraw the districts?

Leave them permanent like state lines or cities. Just because a district has a minority is no reason to redraw lines. They can move or get their kind to move in their district. The fact that they are in the minority should not be reason to redraw lines. If I were to own a million dollar home in a nice part of town I would not want to have my area redrawn to include ghetto's (subsidized housing). It is all a big game.

TOO LATE

If this were so important why didn't the committee meet to compromise a solution since June? Now it is one day after the election and this is news? The Senate and Democrat Black Caucus held the cards with this constitutional item and because the voters retired your majority you cry foul? Why not let Minorities decide for themselves? In 2008 Barack Obama won in the 4th district as did Randy Forbes when he had a black democrat opponent - why do you have to force this? I think it is the job you do and Randy Forbes seems to do it well. Here is something else to consider, I don't see NOW marching in Richmond demanding equal representation for women... where is a WOMAN CONGRESSPERSON for VA? That may be an issue I would support!

The law vs a goal

The law requires each district to have the same number of voters in it not that there be an equal racial mix. While "nice to have" and certainly a goal for all of us to achieve, the real problem rests with our previously elected Senate/House's inability to do their job. Now, the job falls on the backs of those we just elected.

Hmmm.. kinda like the way those clowns in DC do it huh?

Majority overreaching

I guess if you look at what is happening from the 30,000 foot level, this is simply grand politics. Majorities usually beget their own demise a decade later by overreaching and losing voter support. In a sense, if the republicans use their majority to pass their social engineering agenda, which is generally not approved of by most citizens, they will sow the seeds of their own future losses. Frankly, another advantage will be that their decade old war on our transportation infrastructure will now be totally owned by them, and as the outrageous tolls are imposed on Hampton Roads, and soon on other districts in the Commonwealth, it will be them that will have to answer to the voters. Clarity may finally come forth as to responsibility.

Wow, the first thing on the docket for the....

... GOPT is district gerrymandering. Let the chicanery begin!

reverse chicanery

to undo the sneaky tactics used by liberals to achieve what they can not achieve under normal circumstances.

Go ahead and give me a link to some obscure fact like you always do.

RIGHT THERE W/YA KEVIN108

I feel totally locked out of the decision making process in P-Town. I feel like I have no representation & am stuck here. Noone is moving to P-Town & houses just aren't selling. When everyone sees the mess P-Town is, noone in their right mind will come here. That is w/out incentives, IE subsidized houseing. You know what whom that attracts, more dems voter base. No hope for us stuck here. Very depressing indeed.

Voter suppression bills, union busting, anti women, etc...

Get ready Virginia for a tide of voter suppression, pro uranium mining, pro oil company, pro coal company, anti women, anti union, anti gay, and anti working poor legislation. The Republicans are in town.

Unclear

I wonder what part of Anonymous' comment caused anyone to give it a down thumb. It is all true, isn't it?

Comment deleted

Comment removed for rules violation. Reason: Post in ALL CAPS or bold

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Elections rss feed    News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox