The Virginian-Pilot
©
Environmentalists, sportsmen and some politicians have been trying in vain for years to cut the harvest of menhaden, a small but ecologically important fish, in the Chesapeake Bay and other coastal waters. Now, it seems they finally will get their way.
Curiously, the trigger for the anticipated catch reductions, which will be voted on this week at a conference in Boston, was a math error.
Scientists discovered the glitch while reviewing a new study of menhaden populations along the Atlantic coast. After correcting it, they found that overfishing had occurred in 32 out of the past 54 years, though only once in the past decade, in 2008, have commercial fishermen netted too many menhaden.
Combined with chronically low birth rates and fewer fish along the coast, the error spurred regulators with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission to conclude that new protections probably are needed.
When the commission meets Wednesday in Boston, member states from Maine to Florida will vote on proposals that could cut annual harvests between 23 percent and 45 percent. There also is a leave-it-alone option on the table, but few see that passing.
For Virginia, the stakes are especially high.
The town of Reedville, just off the Chesapeake Bay on the Northern Neck peninsula, hosts the only industrial menhaden-processing plant left on the East Coast. It is the biggest employer in the rural region, turning tons of the oily little species into pet food, livestock fodder, fish oil and omega-3 health supplements.
Reedville has been a menhaden hub for more than 120 years. The catch last year - 426.1 million pounds - made the town the second-biggest fishing port by weight in the United States, with a haul worth more than $34 million.
Omega Protein Inc., a Texas-based company that owns the Reedville plant, is fighting the proposed limits, saying they are not needed, may not do any good and will only lead to economic cutbacks and probably job losses.
"Everyone wants to think there's a great crisis out there," said Ben Landry, a company spokesman. "But let me tell you, there's no crisis. We've had overfishing just once - by 1 percentage point, mind you - since 1997. And we're going to pass these limits during a terrible recession? For what?"
Conservationists, however, say the changes are long overdue. Menhaden, they argue, are filter feeders that help purge the Bay of excessive phytoplankton that harm water quality. The fish, which humans do not eat, are devoured by many popular game fish that sportsmen covet in the Bay and along the coast, including striped bass, bluefish and weakfish.
"This is a huge deal," said Chris Moore, a scientist with the Chesapeake Bay Foundation in Norfolk. "Finally, we might soon be able to start rebuilding this vital fishery, recognizing this is not just an economic issue but an ecological one, too."
The proposals have sparked opinions along the entire coast, with the Atlantic commission reporting that it has received more than 91,000 public comments. Most support the changes.
Conservationists and sports fishermen have urged Virginia politicians for decades to impose catch limits on menhaden, saying it would help restore the Bay, re-establish a key link in the food chain and improve stocks of game fish. But each time, lawmakers have said no, in part because of Omega's political clout in Richmond.
Menhaden is the only fish species managed by state legislators; all others in coastal waters are overseen by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission. Efforts to change this unusual equation have also failed.
Jack Travelstead, state fisheries director, will represent Virginia at the commission meeting in Boston. He said the state will support an option setting a new threshold for overfishing that would lead to a 23 percent harvest reduction; it is the same option that Omega endorses.
"We can't support the proposed targets," which would lead to larger reductions, Travelstead said. "They would have too much impact on the industry, and there's no certainty of any benefits from them."
Studies indicate natural conditions - winds, tides, currents - have more influence on menhaden spawning than the number of adult fish in the water. So, Travelstead and others argue, even using catch limits to allow more adults to spawn does not necessarily mean more babies will result.
He also said the cuts will harm a growing industry in Virginia and elsewhere, in which menhaden are netted and sold as bait for blue crabs and other species, including lobsters in Massachusetts and Maine.
While the commission will vote on new thresholds and targets for the Atlantic population, how exactly those resulting reductions will occur will be decided later. Strategies such as a new quota, or closed seasons, or gear restrictions will be hashed out in the months ahead.
Then, each state legislature from Maine to Florida must endorse the rules, which means Omega's political clout may again play a role in Virginia. However, if state lawmakers refuse to adopt the limits, they can be deemed in noncompliance, a status that can lead the federal government to shut down the entire fishery.
"We doubt it could ever get that far," said Moore, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation scientist, "but weirder things have happened when it comes to menhaden."
Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
menhaden overfishing
Omega is a Texas company and made $34 million fishing menhaden in Virginia, yet denies there is any problem and that the menhaden is not overfished. Follow the money. Let's see some documentation of what legislators received donations from Omega and then we will see why this travesty is allowed.
comment
Is this like the "Menhaden Project"?, and does it have anything to do with nuclear fishin'.
Stop the slaughter
We can do without the products derived from menhaden slaughter! Let the second best filtration system in the Chesapeake bay flourish and clean up the water. Omega can go elsewhere to abuse the fish, say like China.
Mehaden limits
The article begins by saying that, "Environmentalists, sportsmen and some politicians have been trying in vain for years to cut the harvest of menhaden, a small but ecologically important fish, in the Chesapeake Bay and other coastal waters." All other states in the Atlantic Fishing Commission, execept Virginia, has been for reduction in catch for years. Virginia has not only resisted the science behind the need to reduce the catch quota, it has chosen to make Mehaden the only fish not regulated by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission. How can anyone conclude anything else but policy in Virginia has been political while ignoring environmental benefits. Come on, give the resource a chance to rebuild itself...please!
Menhaden management in context
If we manage menhaden only for sustained yield of the species, Omega's analysis would be correct, but menhaden are a key element in a complex balance of nature.
Menhaden are also forage fish for most of our other fish species, and inside the Chesapeake Bay, menhaden have another vital role as filter feeders, converting the algae which results from excess nutrients in the bay to forage. The population of menhaden INSIDE THE BAY necessary to fulfill that role is much higher than current populations, as much as five times higher.
To accomplish that, we should ban harvest inside Chesapeake Bay and then determine the catch of adult menhaden in Atlantic waters which can be permitted to maintain an adequate forage population offshore.
Yes! Even Libertarians are starting to get it!
Previous examples of overexploitation of a weaker entity by a more powerful entity are examples of why laissez faire let-the-free-markets-determine-everything do not work. If thoughtful Libertarians like Dr. Tabor get this, then there is HOPE! Yeah!
Yes! Even Libertarians are starting to get it!
Previous examples of overexploitation of a weaker entity by a more powerful entity are examples of why laissez faire let-the-free-markets-determine-everything do not work. If thoughtful Libertarians like Dr. Tabor get this, then there is HOPE! Yeah!
Starting ??
Libertarians have long conceded that regulation is necessary where the market fails to adequately protect us. The market has blind spots regarding external costs and the Tragedy of the Commons. Where to draw the line on such regulation is a difficult problem, as regulations are often turned to purposes beyond addressing those market blind spots.
In any case, its not a new revelation to me. I wrote about those issues earlier this year
http://hamptonroads.com/2011/04/thinking-libertarian-earth-day
an article which specifically used the menhaden fishery as an example of how a political failure can compound those market failures.
I'm surprised
Really Doc, I am surprised at your stand here. I remember what happened to the small, independent watermen in Delaware when menhaden fishing was banned in the Delaware Bay. Limit the harvest, but do not ban it.
The selfishness of some "species" of sport fishermen is appalling to me, and I am a recreational fisher.
i'm surprises too
I'm a Tidewater native and I never knew that
"small independent watermen" harvested menhaden.
Omega is anything but a small independent.
If the bay were healthier,
being a small independent watermen would likely be a more prosperous occupation.